FOB術(shù)語下無單放貨問題研究
[Abstract]:Due to the continuous development of shipping, bill of lading has become the main basis for consignee to collect goods from the carrier. According to China's Maritime Law and other relevant international conventions, the carrier should deliver the goods on the original bill of lading. However, the phenomenon of carrier delivering goods by guarantee and copy of bill of lading is common in our country's trade practice, which will lead to a large number of cases of undocumented delivery disputes. According to the statistics, more than 70% of Southeast Asian countries, more than 90% of Japan and 90% of our domestic ports of import goods, there is no bill of delivery phenomenon. At present, China's export trade uses FOB terms (Chinese and foreign goods sales contracts) contracts have reached 60-70. Therefore, in theory and trade practice, it is very important to solve the problem of non-bill delivery under FOB terminology. First of all, this paper starts from the reason of non-bill delivery and the significance of studying non-bill delivery under FOB terminology, studies the current situation of research on non-bill delivery under FOB terminology at home and abroad, and determines the research method of this paper. Secondly, the legal nature of undocumented delivery and bill of lading under FOB terminology is clarified by using the analysis method of comparison and induction, and the concept of FOB term and the process of contract performance are explained in detail. Then the author further clarifies the liability attribution under the FOB term and the contractual relationship between the theory and the contract. Under the FOB term, the liability attribution of the unbilled goods under different circumstances and the exemption of the carrier's delivery of the goods without the bill are clarified. Finally, the legal problem of non-bill delivery under FOB terminology is analyzed in the process of handling specific cases. Put forward the concrete legal suggestion, and put forward the doctrine that the author inclines from it-the theory of concurrence of tort liability for breach of contract. Then, the author compares the difference between tort action and breach of contract action from substantive and procedural aspects, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the relevant domestic legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D922.294;D996.19
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 司玉琢;UNCITRAL運(yùn)輸法(草案)難點(diǎn)問題研究[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期
2 胡正良;海運(yùn)提單項(xiàng)下的提貨權(quán)與承運(yùn)人無單放貨責(zé)任的認(rèn)定[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年02期
3 謝振銜;FOB術(shù)語下買方的欺詐陷阱[J];國(guó)際市場(chǎng);2005年11期
4 張先立 ,趙 鐳;提單的物權(quán)性質(zhì)與無單放貨的法律責(zé)任[J];航海技術(shù);2002年04期
5 劉宇,李瑞京;論FOB條件下發(fā)貨人權(quán)利的完善[J];世界海運(yùn);2005年06期
6 楊良宜,田正大;無提單交貨[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;1994年00期
7 苗曉飛;海上貨物運(yùn)輸合同的任意解除──兼論對(duì)我國(guó)《海商法》第89條的認(rèn)識(shí)[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;1995年00期
8 初北平;再論記名提單下的無單放貨[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2003年00期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 嚴(yán)凌振;無單放貨之研究[D];上海海運(yùn)學(xué)院;2002年
2 袁斌;對(duì)無單放貨行為法律性質(zhì)的理論研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2006年
3 葉群玲;承運(yùn)人的交貨責(zé)任[D];上海海事大學(xué);2006年
,本文編號(hào):2363911
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2363911.html