【摘要】：擬議中的我國《國際刑事司法協(xié)助法》應(yīng)當(dāng)確立國際條約規(guī)范優(yōu)先適用原則,以解決國內(nèi)法規(guī)范與條約規(guī)范之間可能出現(xiàn)的差異和沖突問題;可以借鑒一些國家的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),將國際刑事法院與"外國"平等看待,采用相同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)處理由國際刑事法院提出的司法協(xié)助請求;對于以資產(chǎn)追繳為目的開展的刑事司法協(xié)助應(yīng)當(dāng)掌握比較嚴(yán)格的審查條件,需要對"財物"一詞作出特別解釋;在為執(zhí)行外國沒收令規(guī)定具體條件時,可以不要求以有關(guān)人員被判定有罪為前提條件,在犯罪嫌疑人或被告人死亡、在逃或者失蹤情況下,只要沒收是依照請求國法律規(guī)定的程序而決定的,同樣可以獲得承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行。
[Abstract]:The proposed Law on International Mutual legal Assistance in Criminal matters should establish the principle of priority application of international treaty norms in order to resolve the possible differences and conflicts between the norms of domestic law and the norms of treaties; Drawing on the legislative experience of some countries, the International Criminal Court could be treated on an equal footing with "foreign States", applying the same criteria to mutual legal assistance requests submitted by the International Criminal Court; With regard to judicial assistance in criminal matters for the purpose of asset recovery, the conditions for examination should be stricter and the term "property" needed to be interpreted in particular; When setting specific conditions for the execution of a foreign confiscation order, it may, without requiring that the person concerned be found guilty, in the case of the death, escape or disappearance of the criminal suspect or accused, Confiscation may also be recognized and enforced as long as it is determined in accordance with procedures established by the law of the requesting State.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)刑事法律科學(xué)研究院;
【基金】：司法部“法治建設(shè)與法學(xué)理論研究”2009年一般項目《國際刑事司法協(xié)助國內(nèi)立法問題比較研究》(項目批準(zhǔn)號:09SFB2053)成果之一
【分類號】：D997.9;D925.2
，

本文編號：2362863