【摘要】：2009年12月,國際三大評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)相繼下調(diào)希臘主權(quán)債務(wù)評(píng)級(jí),隨后,國際三大評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)之一的惠譽(yù)將該國信貸評(píng)級(jí)下調(diào)一個(gè)等級(jí),另外兩個(gè)評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)也隨即宣布下調(diào)希臘主權(quán)評(píng)級(jí)。這標(biāo)志著歐元區(qū)內(nèi)部主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的爆發(fā)。本文從外圍因素和內(nèi)部因素深入挖掘此次歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的根本原因,說明危機(jī)的爆發(fā)在法律缺失方面存在一定的必然性。 現(xiàn)代社會(huì)各國的金融體系和金融法律制度已經(jīng)日益完善,但在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化、國際金融一體化的作用下,一國的債務(wù)危機(jī)很容易成為地區(qū)性甚至全球性的現(xiàn)象,此次歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的發(fā)生再次證明了這一命題的正確性。由此可以看出一國的金融穩(wěn)定涉及到全球的金融安全與經(jīng)濟(jì)穩(wěn)定；關(guān)注全球金融危機(jī)發(fā)生的深層次原因,在研究歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)法律誘因的特點(diǎn)與趨勢(shì)的基礎(chǔ)上,特別是從擔(dān)保法的角度思索應(yīng)付歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的對(duì)策,有利于維護(hù)全球金融市場(chǎng)的穩(wěn)定,促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,從而得以使各國擺脫主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的困擾,同時(shí)為下一步發(fā)展創(chuàng)造條件。因此,國際機(jī)構(gòu)和各國政府應(yīng)該進(jìn)一步合作,歐洲各國應(yīng)對(duì)此次債務(wù)危機(jī),必須繼續(xù)完善法律制度,采取法律措施,從而做到從根本上應(yīng)對(duì)歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)。 本文分為四個(gè)部分,第一部分對(duì)主權(quán)債務(wù)和主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的基本理論進(jìn)行概述,同時(shí)以希臘為例,分析歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)發(fā)生的各種原因,特別是從法律方面概述。第二部分對(duì)政府擔(dān)保問題進(jìn)行分析,包括法律性質(zhì)和法律效力。同時(shí)對(duì)政府在債務(wù)危機(jī)中應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)的責(zé)任進(jìn)行總結(jié)。第三部分是歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的法律解決方案,本文以三個(gè)角度,即國際貨幣基金組織、歐盟和歐洲主要國家應(yīng)該采取什么法律措施來應(yīng)對(duì)此次債務(wù)危機(jī),以及在未來應(yīng)該如何防范。最后一部分將視角從國外轉(zhuǎn)移到國內(nèi),剖析中國在此次歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)中承擔(dān)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)以及應(yīng)當(dāng)采取的措施。
[Abstract]:In December 2009, Greece's sovereign debt rating was downgraded by three international rating agencies, followed by Fitch, one of the top three international rating agencies, which downgraded the country's credit rating by one grade. Two other rating agencies also announced a downgrade of Greece's sovereign rating. This marks the onset of a sovereign debt crisis within the euro zone. This paper explores the fundamental causes of the European sovereign debt crisis from the external and internal factors, and shows that the outbreak of the crisis is inevitable in the aspect of lack of law. The financial system and financial legal system of various countries in modern society have been improved day by day. However, under the influence of economic globalization and international financial integration, the debt crisis of a country can easily become a regional or even global phenomenon. The emergence of the European sovereign debt crisis once again proved the validity of this proposition. From this we can see that the financial stability of a country is related to the global financial security and economic stability; Concerned about the deep-seated causes of the global financial crisis, and on the basis of the study of the characteristics and trends of the legal causes of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, in particular the consideration of countermeasures to deal with the European sovereign debt crisis from the perspective of the guarantee law, It helps to maintain the stability of the global financial market and promote economic development, thus enabling countries to extricate themselves from sovereign debt crisis and create conditions for further development. Therefore, international institutions and governments should further cooperate. European countries must continue to improve their legal system and take legal measures to deal with the debt crisis in Europe. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part summarizes the basic theories of sovereign debt and sovereign debt crisis. At the same time, taking Greece as an example, it analyzes the causes of European sovereign debt crisis, especially from the legal aspect. The second part analyzes the issue of government guarantee, including the legal nature and legal effect. At the same time, the government should bear the responsibility in the debt crisis. The third part is the legal solution to the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. This paper uses three angles, namely, the International Monetary Fund, the European Union and major European countries to take legal measures to deal with the debt crisis. And how to prevent it in the future. The last part analyzes the risks and measures China should take in the European sovereign debt crisis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.2;F815

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 崔文芳;馬宇;;歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的特點(diǎn)與成因[J];長春金融高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

2 盧文鵬,尹晨;隱性擔(dān)保、補(bǔ)償替代與政府債務(wù)——兼論我國的財(cái)政風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問題[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年01期

3 郭玉軍;國際貸款中的擔(dān)保[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1995年05期

4 顧功耘;;金融衍生工具與法律規(guī)制的創(chuàng)新[J];法學(xué);2006年03期

5 邵沙平;蘇潔澈;;金融危機(jī)法律應(yīng)對(duì)措施的國際視野——以銀行業(yè)為例的分析[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年05期

6 郭豫;金融創(chuàng)新及其法律監(jiān)管[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

7 安宇宏;;何謂主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2010年06期

8 巴喬;;主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī),后金融危機(jī)的一個(gè)新特點(diǎn)[J];今日財(cái)富(金融發(fā)展與監(jiān)管);2010年03期

9 張龍清;;主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)下的美元與黃金[J];金融博覽(銀行客戶);2010年03期

10 陳西果;陳建宇;;新一輪歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)探析[J];青海金融;2011年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王明艷;或有債務(wù)視角下的主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)分析[D];北京交通大學(xué);2011年

2 楊軍成;歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)初探[D];中共中央黨校;2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2356363