中美輪胎特保案之法律思考
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-20 04:13
【摘要】：中美輪胎特保案是啟動世界貿(mào)易組織爭端解決程序解決的第一個針對中國產(chǎn)品的特別保障措施案件。該案也是美國對中國所發(fā)動的特保調(diào)查案件中規(guī)模最大的一個,在后金融危機時期,各國都處于經(jīng)濟重創(chuàng)后的恢復期,系統(tǒng)性的消費能力下降,正是在這樣的大背景下奧巴馬政府于2009年宣布對中國輸美輪胎產(chǎn)品實施特別保障措施,具體做法為附加高額的關(guān)稅。雙方磋商未果后經(jīng)WTO爭端解決機構(gòu)裁決,本文正是立足于特保機制的研究并對專家組的裁決進行分析。 本論文分為四個部分： 第一部分：輪胎特保案案情簡介,簡要回顧輪胎特保案的發(fā)生背景。另外還根據(jù)案件進展情況所制作了一個完整又簡單清楚的案情發(fā)展回顧,在序列的最后部分列出了上訴機構(gòu)對此案的最終核心意見。 第二部分：輪胎特保案法律問題解析,首先介紹了保障措施及特別保障措施,包括其淵源、性質(zhì)、原則。然后將“中國式特�！碧貏e作為一個方面進行解析。再次,將《保障措施協(xié)議》體系下的保障措施與《中國入世議定書》中的,“中國式特�！边M行了一個較為全面的比較,并其后闡明了兩者的關(guān)系及適用,力圖明確全案的法律問題。 第三部分對專家組裁決的分析：以中國提交至WTO爭端解決機構(gòu)的申訴報告為基礎(chǔ),穿插了WTO法律解釋之規(guī)則的分析,再就專家組案件爭議焦點的裁決進行逐一評析、總結(jié)。 第四部分敗訴的思考及對策：針對上一部分專家組的裁決,分析來自于中國自身的原因,并就未來應對“中國式特�！碧岢鲆恍⿲Σ�。
[Abstract]:The Sino-American tire protection case is the first special safeguard case against Chinese products to start the WTO dispute settlement process. This case is also the largest of the special protection investigations launched by the United States against China. In the post-financial crisis period, all countries are in the recovery period after the economic downfall, and the systemic spending power has declined. It is against this backdrop that the Obama administration announced in 2009 special safeguards for Chinese tire exports to the United States by imposing high tariffs. After the negotiation between the two sides failed, the WTO dispute settlement body ruled, this article is based on the research of the special safeguard mechanism and the analysis of the panel ruling. This thesis is divided into four parts: the first part: brief introduction of tire protection case, briefly review the background of tire protection case. In addition, a complete, simple and clear review of developments is made based on the progress of the case, and the final core opinion of the appellate body on the case is set out in the final part of the sequence. The second part: the analysis of the legal problems of tire special protection case. Firstly, it introduces the safeguard measures and special safeguard measures, including their origin, nature and principle. Then the "Chinese special safeguard" as a particular aspect of the analysis. Thirdly, the safeguard measures under the safeguards Agreement system are compared with those in the Protocol of China's accession to the WTO, and the relationship and application of the two measures are expounded. Try to clarify the legal issues of the whole case. The third part analyzes the panel decision: based on the complaint report submitted by China to the WTO dispute settlement body, the author intersperses the analysis of the rules of the WTO legal interpretation, and then evaluates the dispute focus of the panel case one by one, and summarizes the conclusion. In the fourth part, the author analyzes the reasons from China and puts forward some countermeasures to deal with the "Chinese special safeguard" in the future.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1
本文編號：2343681
[Abstract]:The Sino-American tire protection case is the first special safeguard case against Chinese products to start the WTO dispute settlement process. This case is also the largest of the special protection investigations launched by the United States against China. In the post-financial crisis period, all countries are in the recovery period after the economic downfall, and the systemic spending power has declined. It is against this backdrop that the Obama administration announced in 2009 special safeguards for Chinese tire exports to the United States by imposing high tariffs. After the negotiation between the two sides failed, the WTO dispute settlement body ruled, this article is based on the research of the special safeguard mechanism and the analysis of the panel ruling. This thesis is divided into four parts: the first part: brief introduction of tire protection case, briefly review the background of tire protection case. In addition, a complete, simple and clear review of developments is made based on the progress of the case, and the final core opinion of the appellate body on the case is set out in the final part of the sequence. The second part: the analysis of the legal problems of tire special protection case. Firstly, it introduces the safeguard measures and special safeguard measures, including their origin, nature and principle. Then the "Chinese special safeguard" as a particular aspect of the analysis. Thirdly, the safeguard measures under the safeguards Agreement system are compared with those in the Protocol of China's accession to the WTO, and the relationship and application of the two measures are expounded. Try to clarify the legal issues of the whole case. The third part analyzes the panel decision: based on the complaint report submitted by China to the WTO dispute settlement body, the author intersperses the analysis of the rules of the WTO legal interpretation, and then evaluates the dispute focus of the panel case one by one, and summarizes the conclusion. In the fourth part, the author analyzes the reasons from China and puts forward some countermeasures to deal with the "Chinese special safeguard" in the future.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 劉新宇;試析美國對華第一起特殊保障措施案[J];當代法學;2003年09期
2 李娟;;“美國對華輪胎特保案”述評——以WTO相關(guān)規(guī)則為參照系[J];法商研究;2010年01期
3 曾令良;中國特定產(chǎn)品過渡性保障機制的有效性與合理性問題[J];法學評論;2005年05期
4 楊威;;從美國對華輪胎特保案淺析貿(mào)易保護主義[J];經(jīng)濟研究導刊;2010年34期
5 武立宏;;論特別保障措施涉及的法律問題[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動態(tài)與研究;2003年08期
6 賀小勇;;論近期中美貿(mào)易摩擦的法律對策[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動態(tài)與研究;2004年04期
7 黃志瑾;;中美輪胎特保案專家組報告評析——敗訴的啟示[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動態(tài)與研究;2011年02期
8 M.希爾夫,朱益宇,黃列;權(quán)力,規(guī)則和原則——哪一個是WTO/GATT的法律導向?[J];環(huán)球法津評論;2001年02期
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條
1 楊璐;論中美輪胎特保案中專家組的裁決[D];中國政法大學;2011年
2 董磊;對華特殊保障措施法律問題研究[D];中國政法大學;2006年
，本文編號：2343681
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2343681.html
