天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 國際法論文 >

擔(dān)保國在“區(qū)域”勘探和開發(fā)中的義務(wù)研究

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-11-18 09:04
【摘要】:1982年《聯(lián)合國海洋法公約》規(guī)定了個(gè)人和實(shí)體進(jìn)行國際海底區(qū)域活動(dòng)時(shí)需要締約國提供擔(dān)保,盡管擔(dān)保國沒有直接從事“區(qū)域”活動(dòng),但擔(dān)保國需要履行相關(guān)的國際義務(wù)以確保“區(qū)域”活動(dòng)的順利進(jìn)行,另一方面擔(dān)保國也要盡其所能履行義務(wù)以減輕所承擔(dān)的擔(dān)保風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。擔(dān)保國在勘探階段的義務(wù)主要分為兩類,一類是“確!绷x務(wù),一類是擔(dān)保國的直接義務(wù)。擔(dān)保國的“確!绷x務(wù)指的是擔(dān)保國需要通過制定法律法規(guī)和采取行政措施來“確!背邪咴谶M(jìn)行“區(qū)域”活動(dòng)時(shí)履行相關(guān)的義務(wù),擔(dān)保國要在其法律制度內(nèi)規(guī)定:(1)進(jìn)行“區(qū)域”活動(dòng)承包者的主體;(2)頒發(fā)資格許可和擔(dān)保書的條件;(3)承包者不遵守規(guī)定的懲罰措施;(4)確保承包者履行環(huán)境保護(hù)義務(wù);(5)建立執(zhí)行機(jī)制以便有效監(jiān)督承包者在“區(qū)域”的活動(dòng);(6)執(zhí)行有關(guān)國際法庭和仲裁庭的裁決。擔(dān)保國的直接義務(wù)指的是擔(dān)保國自身在“區(qū)域”活動(dòng)中擔(dān)保國自身需要履行的義務(wù)。對(duì)于擔(dān)保國直接義務(wù)的履行方式有兩類,一類是通過制定法律法規(guī)來履行,一類是通過擔(dān)保國直接行為來履行。通過制定法律法規(guī)來履行的義務(wù)有:(1)協(xié)助管理局;(2)承包者造成損害后確保申訴可以賠償。另一類通過擔(dān)保國直接行為履行的義務(wù)有:(1)采取預(yù)先防范辦法;(2)采取最佳環(huán)境做法和最佳技術(shù);(3)進(jìn)行環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià);(4)承擔(dān)技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓義務(wù);(5)制定勘探訓(xùn)練計(jì)劃;(6)擔(dān)保國終止擔(dān)保需要告知海底管理局秘書長;(7)核正承包者所提交的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表。如果擔(dān)保國沒有履行其義務(wù)并因此造成了實(shí)際損害,包括“確!绷x務(wù)和直接義務(wù),那么擔(dān)保國需要承擔(dān)賠償責(zé)任。在上述義務(wù)中,只有在采取預(yù)先防范辦法時(shí)發(fā)展中國家擔(dān)保國的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)可以低于發(fā)達(dá)國家擔(dān)保國。對(duì)于擔(dān)保國在“區(qū)域”開發(fā)階段的義務(wù),除了在勘探階段所承擔(dān)的義務(wù)外,擔(dān)保國還承擔(dān)的義務(wù)有:(1)在國內(nèi)法中要采用嚴(yán)格責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則;(2)協(xié)助管理局和交換信息;(3)監(jiān)視承包者活動(dòng);(4)監(jiān)督區(qū)域利益分享機(jī)制。我們應(yīng)該注意到,1982年《聯(lián)合國海洋法公約》中要求在“區(qū)域”活動(dòng)中,要照顧發(fā)展中國家和地理不利國的特殊利益和需求。我國積極履行作為擔(dān)保國的義務(wù),包括制訂《中華人民共和國深海海底區(qū)域資源勘探開發(fā)法》和按照國際法和國際海底管理局的相關(guān)要求履行作為擔(dān)保國的義務(wù),我國在“區(qū)域”活動(dòng)中的實(shí)踐履行了我國作為擔(dān)保國的直接義務(wù)。隨著我國“區(qū)域”活動(dòng)主體的增多,如何切實(shí)履行擔(dān)保國義務(wù)以有效減輕我國作為擔(dān)保國的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)是我國作為擔(dān)保國在“區(qū)域”活動(dòng)中需要解決的問題。
[Abstract]:The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea provides that States parties are required to provide guarantees for the conduct of activities in the international seabed area by individuals and entities, although the sponsoring State is not directly engaged in activities in the area, The sponsoring State, however, needs to fulfil the relevant international obligations in order to ensure the smooth conduct of activities in the area and, on the other hand, the sponsoring State must do its utmost to fulfil its obligations in order to mitigate the risk of security. The obligations of the sponsoring State in the exploration stage are divided into two main categories, one is the obligation to "ensure" and the other is the direct obligation of the sponsoring State. The obligation of the sponsoring State to "ensure" the need for the sponsoring State to "ensure" the fulfilment of the relevant obligations of the contractor in carrying out its activities in the area through the adoption of laws and regulations and administrative measures, The sponsoring State shall provide in its legal system: (I) the subject of the contractor for the conduct of activities in the area; (II) conditions for the issuance of qualifications and guarantees; (III) non-compliance by the contractor with the required penalties; and (iv) ensuring compliance by the contractor with its obligations to protect the environment; (v) Establishment of enforcement mechanisms to effectively monitor the activities of contractors in the area; and (vi) enforcement of decisions of relevant international tribunals and arbitral tribunals. The direct obligation of the sponsoring State refers to the obligations to be performed by the sponsoring State itself in its own activities in the area. There are two types of performance of the direct obligation of the sponsoring State, one is by enacting laws and regulations, and the other is by the direct act of the sponsoring State. The obligations to be fulfilled by establishing laws and regulations include: (I) assisting the Authority; and (II) ensuring that the claim is compensable after the contractor has caused the damage. The other types of obligations performed through the direct conduct of the sponsoring State are: (I) a precautionary approach; (II) best environmental practices and techniques; (III) an environmental impact assessment; and (iv) an obligation to transfer technology; (v) Development of a plan for exploration training; (vi) notification by the sponsoring State to the Secretary-General of the Authority of the need to terminate the guarantee; and (VII) approval of the financial statements submitted by the contractor. If the sponsoring State fails to fulfil its obligations and thereby causes actual harm, including the obligation to "ensure" and the direct obligation, the sponsoring State is liable. Of the above obligations, the standard of sponsoring State of developing State may be lower than that of sponsoring State of developed country only when a precautionary approach is taken. With regard to the obligations of the sponsoring State in the exploitation phase of the area, in addition to its obligations during the exploration phase, the sponsoring State has the following obligations: (I) the principle of strict liability shall be applied in domestic law; (II) Assistance to the Authority and exchange of information; (III) monitoring of contractor activities; and (iv) supervision of regional benefit-sharing mechanisms. We should note that the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea calls for the special interests and needs of developing and geographically disadvantaged States to be taken into account in activities in the area. Actively fulfilling its obligations as a sponsoring State, including the enactment of the Law of the people's Republic of China on Exploration and Exploitation of the Resources of the Deep seabed area and the fulfilment of its obligations as a sponsoring State in accordance with international law and the relevant requirements of the International seabed Authority, Our practice in the area fulfils our direct obligations as a sponsoring State. With the increase of the subject of "area" activities in China, how to effectively fulfill the obligations of the sponsoring State in order to effectively reduce the risk of our country as a sponsoring State is a problem that needs to be solved in the activities of the "area" as a sponsoring State.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:國際關(guān)系學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號(hào)】:D993.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 子玉;“放!迸c“賠!盵J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);1989年S4期

2 黃新成;承包者成囚犯的啟迪[J];湖南林業(yè);1994年05期

3 ;受群眾歡迎的小評(píng)論[J];黨建;1988年11期

4 彭大貴;周正康;唐進(jìn);彭光紅;;第二輪承包者的要與不要[J];鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)論壇;1990年10期

5 彭大貴;周正康;唐進(jìn);彭光紅;;新一輪承包者13個(gè)“要”與“不要”[J];決策探索;1991年02期

6 高爾咸;;打“鐵”小議三則[J];民主與科學(xué);1992年03期

7 李金聲;;承包者能貪污自己的財(cái)產(chǎn)嗎?[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);1988年03期

8 蔡炯;;談個(gè)體承包者挪用工程預(yù)付款的刑事責(zé)任[J];政法學(xué)刊;1988年03期

9 毛永林;國營系統(tǒng)承包制企業(yè)的權(quán)利關(guān)系探討[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年S1期

10 ;中國經(jīng)濟(jì)方略之我見[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;1992年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 通訊員 張麗華;以獎(jiǎng)代投200萬元搞綠化[N];巴彥淖爾日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2007年

2 王廷樹;安全工作不能“以包代管”[N];中國冶金報(bào);2005年

3 黃海洋 吳詠梅;承包者占有上繳定額利潤后的盈利部分不構(gòu)成貪污罪[N];人民法院報(bào);2007年

4 海南省國營西培農(nóng)場場長 陸國興;在完善承包改革中彰顯執(zhí)行力[N];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)報(bào);2008年

5 黎付林;劃小承包,關(guān)鍵在培養(yǎng)CEO能力[N];人民郵電;2014年

6 趙玉雷;誰來保護(hù)管護(hù)承包者的利益?[N];中國綠色時(shí)報(bào);2004年

7 嘉璽;“保險(xiǎn)是企業(yè)承包者的護(hù)身符”[N];中國保險(xiǎn)報(bào);2014年

8 謝云挺 潘勤儉;“院中院”現(xiàn)象屢禁不止[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2004年

9 蕭山記者站 王麗芳邋方亮 通訊員 唐宇船;110輛公交承包者簽終止承包協(xié)議[N];杭州日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

10 王景元 李金池;小開河引黃干渠捆綁式承包的啟示[N];中國水利報(bào);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 謝豐澤;擔(dān)保國在“區(qū)域”勘探和開發(fā)中的義務(wù)研究[D];國際關(guān)系學(xué)院;2016年

,

本文編號(hào):2339571

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2339571.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶9fbcd***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com