【摘要】：隨著市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的深入發(fā)展,國(guó)際國(guó)內(nèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)日趨激烈,商業(yè)秘密作為競(jìng)爭(zhēng)取勝的重要手段之一,其作用也越來(lái)越大,受到了各國(guó)的廣泛關(guān)注和重視。與專(zhuān)利等傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)相比,商業(yè)秘密具有保護(hù)范圍廣,保護(hù)期限長(zhǎng)等優(yōu)點(diǎn),發(fā)展空間越來(lái)越大;但是對(duì)商業(yè)秘密的法律保護(hù)與救濟(jì)等措施卻相對(duì)落后,許多國(guó)家尤其是發(fā)展中國(guó)家并沒(méi)有認(rèn)識(shí)到商業(yè)秘密背后的經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值。近年來(lái),伴隨著《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)定》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)TRIPS協(xié)定)的生效,商業(yè)秘密的國(guó)際保護(hù)趨勢(shì)愈加明顯。TRIPS協(xié)定對(duì)各國(guó),尤其是發(fā)展中國(guó)家的商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)提供了法律指導(dǎo)。多數(shù)企業(yè)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)已經(jīng)形成了相應(yīng)的意識(shí),但企業(yè)對(duì)于自身商業(yè)秘密的保護(hù)仍處于一種不規(guī)范的狀態(tài),侵犯商業(yè)秘密的案件時(shí)有發(fā)生,權(quán)利得不到保障和救濟(jì)。因此本文欲在TRIPS協(xié)定的框架下,通過(guò)比較研究方法,希望能對(duì)企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密的保護(hù)提供現(xiàn)實(shí)幫助。 本文共有四個(gè)部分,主要內(nèi)容如下: 第一部分:商業(yè)秘密基本理論問(wèn)題概述。 從商業(yè)秘密受保護(hù)的原因入手,對(duì)各國(guó)及國(guó)際組織對(duì)商業(yè)秘密的界定進(jìn)行歸納,從而總結(jié)出商業(yè)秘密的一般特征。同時(shí),還研究了商業(yè)秘密的范圍和分類(lèi)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),尤其對(duì)客戶(hù)名單這一特殊的商業(yè)秘密分析了具體的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第二部分:TRIPS協(xié)定對(duì)商業(yè)秘密的保護(hù)與限制。 第二部分以TRIPS協(xié)定為核心,介紹了TRIPS協(xié)定對(duì)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)的規(guī)定及法律性質(zhì)的認(rèn)定;著重闡述了TRIPS協(xié)定下商業(yè)秘密的構(gòu)成要件:秘密性、價(jià)值性和合理措施。同時(shí),分析了對(duì)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)的限制,以防止權(quán)力的濫用。 第三部分:商業(yè)秘密法律救濟(jì)制度的比較研究。 該部分通過(guò)比較分析方法,以TRIPS協(xié)定為藍(lán)本,比較分析了美國(guó)、德國(guó)、日本和我國(guó)對(duì)侵犯商業(yè)秘密構(gòu)成要件的法律規(guī)定以及法律救濟(jì)制度。同時(shí)以民事救濟(jì)為核心,深入探討了商業(yè)秘密的禁令救濟(jì)制度,并對(duì)我國(guó)提出了相應(yīng)的立法建議。 第四部分:企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)的新課題——競(jìng)業(yè)禁止問(wèn)題。 概述我國(guó)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀,介紹了競(jìng)業(yè)禁止協(xié)議對(duì)防范企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密流失的重要作用;論述了競(jìng)業(yè)禁止的有效要件,從而為企業(yè)提供了一種較為有效的保護(hù)方式。
[Abstract]:With the further development of market economy, the international and domestic economic competition is becoming more and more fierce. As one of the important means to win the competition, trade secret is playing a more and more important role. Compared with traditional intellectual property rights such as patents, trade secrets have the advantages of wide scope of protection and long term of protection. However, the legal protection and relief of trade secrets are relatively backward, and many countries, especially developing countries, do not realize the economic value behind trade secrets. In recent years, with the entry into force of the Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of intellectual property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), the trend of international protection of trade secrets has become increasingly obvious. In particular, the protection of trade secrets in developing countries provides legal guidance. Most enterprises have formed the corresponding consciousness to the protection of traditional intellectual property rights, but the protection of their own trade secrets is still in an irregular state, the cases of infringing trade secrets occur from time to time, and the rights are not guaranteed and relieved. Therefore, under the framework of TRIPS agreement, this paper hopes to provide practical help for the protection of business secrets through comparative research methods. There are four parts in this paper. The main contents are as follows: the first part: an overview of the basic theory of trade secrets. Starting with the reasons why trade secrets are protected, this paper sums up the definition of trade secrets in various countries and international organizations, and sums up the general characteristics of trade secrets. At the same time, the scope and classification criteria of trade secret are studied, especially the identification standard of customer list, which is a special trade secret. Part two: the protection and restriction of trade secret under TRIPS agreement. The second part takes the TRIPS Agreement as the core, introduces the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement on the protection of trade secrets and the recognition of its legal nature, and focuses on the constitutive requirements of trade secrets under the TRIPS Agreement: secrecy, value and reasonable measures. At the same time, it analyzes the limitation of trade secret protection to prevent abuse of power. The third part: the comparative study of the legal remedy system of trade secret. Based on the TRIPS Agreement, this part compares and analyzes the legal provisions and the legal relief system of the constitutive elements of violating trade secrets in the United States, Germany, Japan and China through the method of comparative analysis. At the same time, taking civil relief as the core, this paper probes deeply into the prohibition relief system of trade secret, and puts forward corresponding legislative suggestions to our country. The fourth part: the new topic of business secret protection-non-competition. This paper summarizes the current situation of the protection of commercial secrets in China, introduces the important role of non-compete agreement in preventing the loss of business secrets, and discusses the effective elements of the prohibition of competition, thus providing an effective way for enterprises to protect themselves.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.1;D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘冬,潘晴;TRIPs協(xié)議與相關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際公約比較[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年05期

2 趙哲鋒;;中小企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)之法律探析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年10期

3 鄭成思;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的國(guó)際保護(hù)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年03期

4 左劍君;;論企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];鄂州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

5 胡開(kāi)忠;論無(wú)形財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的體系及其在民法典中的地位和歸屬[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年01期

6 謝曉堯;商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)的國(guó)際最低標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——對(duì)TRIPS第39條的解析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2002年05期

7 徐朝賢;美、德、日商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)救濟(jì)制度的發(fā)展及借鑒[J];河北法學(xué);2001年02期

8 于強(qiáng);;競(jìng)業(yè)限制與企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

9 羅立;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)背景下的商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期

10 陳海峰;;TRIPS框架下商業(yè)秘密權(quán)與勞動(dòng)權(quán)沖突問(wèn)題探討[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2337664