TRIPS框架下企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密的國際保護
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-17 11:44
【摘要】：隨著市場經(jīng)濟的深入發(fā)展,國際國內(nèi)經(jīng)濟競爭日趨激烈,商業(yè)秘密作為競爭取勝的重要手段之一,其作用也越來越大,受到了各國的廣泛關注和重視。與專利等傳統(tǒng)知識產(chǎn)權相比,商業(yè)秘密具有保護范圍廣,保護期限長等優(yōu)點,發(fā)展空間越來越大;但是對商業(yè)秘密的法律保護與救濟等措施卻相對落后,許多國家尤其是發(fā)展中國家并沒有認識到商業(yè)秘密背后的經(jīng)濟價值。近年來,伴隨著《與貿(mào)易有關的知識產(chǎn)權協(xié)定》(以下簡稱TRIPS協(xié)定)的生效,商業(yè)秘密的國際保護趨勢愈加明顯。TRIPS協(xié)定對各國,尤其是發(fā)展中國家的商業(yè)秘密保護提供了法律指導。多數(shù)企業(yè)對傳統(tǒng)知識產(chǎn)權保護已經(jīng)形成了相應的意識,但企業(yè)對于自身商業(yè)秘密的保護仍處于一種不規(guī)范的狀態(tài),侵犯商業(yè)秘密的案件時有發(fā)生,權利得不到保障和救濟。因此本文欲在TRIPS協(xié)定的框架下,通過比較研究方法,希望能對企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密的保護提供現(xiàn)實幫助。 本文共有四個部分,主要內(nèi)容如下: 第一部分:商業(yè)秘密基本理論問題概述。 從商業(yè)秘密受保護的原因入手,對各國及國際組織對商業(yè)秘密的界定進行歸納,從而總結出商業(yè)秘密的一般特征。同時,還研究了商業(yè)秘密的范圍和分類標準,尤其對客戶名單這一特殊的商業(yè)秘密分析了具體的認定標準。 第二部分:TRIPS協(xié)定對商業(yè)秘密的保護與限制。 第二部分以TRIPS協(xié)定為核心,介紹了TRIPS協(xié)定對商業(yè)秘密保護的規(guī)定及法律性質(zhì)的認定;著重闡述了TRIPS協(xié)定下商業(yè)秘密的構成要件:秘密性、價值性和合理措施。同時,分析了對商業(yè)秘密保護的限制,以防止權力的濫用。 第三部分:商業(yè)秘密法律救濟制度的比較研究。 該部分通過比較分析方法,以TRIPS協(xié)定為藍本,比較分析了美國、德國、日本和我國對侵犯商業(yè)秘密構成要件的法律規(guī)定以及法律救濟制度。同時以民事救濟為核心,深入探討了商業(yè)秘密的禁令救濟制度,并對我國提出了相應的立法建議。 第四部分:企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密保護的新課題——競業(yè)禁止問題。 概述我國商業(yè)秘密保護的現(xiàn)狀,介紹了競業(yè)禁止協(xié)議對防范企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密流失的重要作用;論述了競業(yè)禁止的有效要件,從而為企業(yè)提供了一種較為有效的保護方式。
[Abstract]:With the further development of market economy, the international and domestic economic competition is becoming more and more fierce. As one of the important means to win the competition, trade secret is playing a more and more important role. Compared with traditional intellectual property rights such as patents, trade secrets have the advantages of wide scope of protection and long term of protection. However, the legal protection and relief of trade secrets are relatively backward, and many countries, especially developing countries, do not realize the economic value behind trade secrets. In recent years, with the entry into force of the Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of intellectual property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), the trend of international protection of trade secrets has become increasingly obvious. In particular, the protection of trade secrets in developing countries provides legal guidance. Most enterprises have formed the corresponding consciousness to the protection of traditional intellectual property rights, but the protection of their own trade secrets is still in an irregular state, the cases of infringing trade secrets occur from time to time, and the rights are not guaranteed and relieved. Therefore, under the framework of TRIPS agreement, this paper hopes to provide practical help for the protection of business secrets through comparative research methods. There are four parts in this paper. The main contents are as follows: the first part: an overview of the basic theory of trade secrets. Starting with the reasons why trade secrets are protected, this paper sums up the definition of trade secrets in various countries and international organizations, and sums up the general characteristics of trade secrets. At the same time, the scope and classification criteria of trade secret are studied, especially the identification standard of customer list, which is a special trade secret. Part two: the protection and restriction of trade secret under TRIPS agreement. The second part takes the TRIPS Agreement as the core, introduces the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement on the protection of trade secrets and the recognition of its legal nature, and focuses on the constitutive requirements of trade secrets under the TRIPS Agreement: secrecy, value and reasonable measures. At the same time, it analyzes the limitation of trade secret protection to prevent abuse of power. The third part: the comparative study of the legal remedy system of trade secret. Based on the TRIPS Agreement, this part compares and analyzes the legal provisions and the legal relief system of the constitutive elements of violating trade secrets in the United States, Germany, Japan and China through the method of comparative analysis. At the same time, taking civil relief as the core, this paper probes deeply into the prohibition relief system of trade secret, and puts forward corresponding legislative suggestions to our country. The fourth part: the new topic of business secret protection-non-competition. This paper summarizes the current situation of the protection of commercial secrets in China, introduces the important role of non-compete agreement in preventing the loss of business secrets, and discusses the effective elements of the prohibition of competition, thus providing an effective way for enterprises to protect themselves.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.1;D996.1
本文編號：2337664
[Abstract]:With the further development of market economy, the international and domestic economic competition is becoming more and more fierce. As one of the important means to win the competition, trade secret is playing a more and more important role. Compared with traditional intellectual property rights such as patents, trade secrets have the advantages of wide scope of protection and long term of protection. However, the legal protection and relief of trade secrets are relatively backward, and many countries, especially developing countries, do not realize the economic value behind trade secrets. In recent years, with the entry into force of the Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of intellectual property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), the trend of international protection of trade secrets has become increasingly obvious. In particular, the protection of trade secrets in developing countries provides legal guidance. Most enterprises have formed the corresponding consciousness to the protection of traditional intellectual property rights, but the protection of their own trade secrets is still in an irregular state, the cases of infringing trade secrets occur from time to time, and the rights are not guaranteed and relieved. Therefore, under the framework of TRIPS agreement, this paper hopes to provide practical help for the protection of business secrets through comparative research methods. There are four parts in this paper. The main contents are as follows: the first part: an overview of the basic theory of trade secrets. Starting with the reasons why trade secrets are protected, this paper sums up the definition of trade secrets in various countries and international organizations, and sums up the general characteristics of trade secrets. At the same time, the scope and classification criteria of trade secret are studied, especially the identification standard of customer list, which is a special trade secret. Part two: the protection and restriction of trade secret under TRIPS agreement. The second part takes the TRIPS Agreement as the core, introduces the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement on the protection of trade secrets and the recognition of its legal nature, and focuses on the constitutive requirements of trade secrets under the TRIPS Agreement: secrecy, value and reasonable measures. At the same time, it analyzes the limitation of trade secret protection to prevent abuse of power. The third part: the comparative study of the legal remedy system of trade secret. Based on the TRIPS Agreement, this part compares and analyzes the legal provisions and the legal relief system of the constitutive elements of violating trade secrets in the United States, Germany, Japan and China through the method of comparative analysis. At the same time, taking civil relief as the core, this paper probes deeply into the prohibition relief system of trade secret, and puts forward corresponding legislative suggestions to our country. The fourth part: the new topic of business secret protection-non-competition. This paper summarizes the current situation of the protection of commercial secrets in China, introduces the important role of non-compete agreement in preventing the loss of business secrets, and discusses the effective elements of the prohibition of competition, thus providing an effective way for enterprises to protect themselves.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.1;D996.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 潘冬,潘晴;TRIPs協(xié)議與相關知識產(chǎn)權國際公約比較[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2004年05期
2 趙哲鋒;;中小企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密保護之法律探析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年10期
3 鄭成思;論知識產(chǎn)權的國際保護[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;1997年03期
4 左劍君;;論企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密保護存在的問題及對策[J];鄂州大學學報;2008年01期
5 胡開忠;論無形財產(chǎn)權的體系及其在民法典中的地位和歸屬[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);2001年01期
6 謝曉堯;商業(yè)秘密保護的國際最低標準——對TRIPS第39條的解析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2002年05期
7 徐朝賢;美、德、日商業(yè)秘密侵權救濟制度的發(fā)展及借鑒[J];河北法學;2001年02期
8 于強;;競業(yè)限制與企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密保護[J];湖北經(jīng)濟學院學報;2009年01期
9 羅立;;網(wǎng)絡背景下的商業(yè)秘密保護[J];華東政法學院學報;2006年06期
10 陳海峰;;TRIPS框架下商業(yè)秘密權與勞動權沖突問題探討[J];廣西社會科學;2010年05期
，本文編號：2337664
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2337664.html
