【摘要】：當(dāng)今,經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化深入發(fā)展,服務(wù)業(yè)在世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展中所占比重迅速擴(kuò)張,其增長(zhǎng)速度快于貨物貿(mào)易的增長(zhǎng)。《服務(wù)貿(mào)易總協(xié)定》(GATS)就是在這種經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展背景中產(chǎn)生,是全球范圍內(nèi)第一套規(guī)制國(guó)際服務(wù)貿(mào)易的多邊規(guī)則與框架體系。服務(wù)貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域逐漸成為國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者關(guān)注的熱門(mén)課題,卻鮮有人對(duì)GATS條文進(jìn)行細(xì)致解讀,特別是很少有人對(duì)服務(wù)貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域原產(chǎn)地確定這一個(gè)基礎(chǔ)理論問(wèn)題進(jìn)行關(guān)注和研究。出于當(dāng)前這種研究現(xiàn)狀,筆者選取該問(wèn)題進(jìn)行初步研究。 整篇文章共三部分:引言、正文、結(jié)語(yǔ)。正文分四個(gè)章節(jié)進(jìn)行闡述: 第一章是對(duì)服務(wù)貿(mào)易原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則概述。首先對(duì)原產(chǎn)地、原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則的概念、由來(lái)以及服務(wù)原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則的缺位現(xiàn)狀作出簡(jiǎn)要介紹,接著通過(guò)總結(jié)服務(wù)貿(mào)易的特點(diǎn)闡述了服務(wù)原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則確立的必要性以及不能把貨物貿(mào)易原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則直接適用于服務(wù)貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域的原因。 第二章為分析GATS下的服務(wù)原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則。首先介紹了GATS劃分的四種服務(wù)提供方式,并將其分成兩類(lèi)來(lái)探討服務(wù)來(lái)源問(wèn)題。本部分著重于法人服務(wù)提供者的來(lái)源地識(shí)別,特別是在商業(yè)存在的情況下,應(yīng)該區(qū)分多種情形。筆者引入“第三次歐共體香蕉案”與“加拿大汽車(chē)案”對(duì)這些標(biāo)準(zhǔn)做了實(shí)證分析和總結(jié)。 第三章是通過(guò)分析區(qū)域一體化協(xié)定及中國(guó)法律規(guī)范中的原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則作比較研究。本章分別總結(jié)和評(píng)價(jià)了NAFTA與歐盟服務(wù)原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則,并著重分析了以CEPA為代表的我國(guó)的服務(wù)原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則,而后對(duì)此進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要評(píng)價(jià)。 第四章引入實(shí)質(zhì)性投入標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以期解決GATS現(xiàn)有原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則存在的幾種適用困難的情形。筆者以貨物貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域的增值標(biāo)準(zhǔn)作為借鑒,分析實(shí)質(zhì)性投入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的合理性、可行性及現(xiàn)實(shí)中可能存在的障礙問(wèn)題,提出自己的思考及困惑。最后,筆者提出,這些問(wèn)題并非短期內(nèi)可以解決,有賴(lài)于學(xué)界更多關(guān)注及GATS成員的進(jìn)一步談判。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the deepening development of economic globalization, the proportion of service industry in the development of the world economy is expanding rapidly, and its growth rate is faster than that of trade in goods. The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) has emerged in this background of economic development. It is the first set of multilateral rules and framework to regulate international trade in services. The field of trade in services has gradually become a hot topic that scholars at home and abroad pay close attention to, but few people interpret the provisions of GATS in detail, especially few people pay attention to and study the basic theoretical issue of origin determination in the field of trade in services. In view of the present research situation, the author chooses this question to carry on the preliminary research. The whole article consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is an overview of rules of origin of trade in services. First of all, a brief introduction is made to the concept of origin, the origin of rules of origin and the status quo of the absence of rules of origin for services. Then the necessity of establishing rules of origin of services and the reasons why rules of origin of trade in goods can not be directly applied to the field of trade in services are expounded by summarizing the characteristics of trade in services. The second chapter analyzes the rules of origin under GATS. This paper first introduces four kinds of service providing methods divided by GATS, and divides them into two categories to discuss the problem of service source. This section focuses on the source identification of corporate service providers, especially in the case of commercial presence, should distinguish between multiple situations. The author introduces the third Banana case of EC and the car case of Canada to make an empirical analysis and summary of these standards. The third chapter makes a comparative study by analyzing the regional integration agreement and the rules of origin in China's legal norms. This chapter summarizes and evaluates the rules of origin of service in NAFTA and EU respectively, and analyzes the rules of origin of service in China, represented by CEPA, and then gives a brief evaluation. Chapter four introduces substantive input standard to solve the difficulties of GATS existing rules of origin. The author uses the value-added standards in the field of goods trade as a reference, analyzes the rationality, feasibility and possible obstacles in reality of substantive input standards, and puts forward his own thinking and confusion. Finally, the author points out that these problems can not be solved in the short term, but depend on more academic attention and further negotiation among GATS members.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.1;F746.18

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 石靜霞,胡榮國(guó);區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化中的服務(wù)貿(mào)易問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年05期

2 姚瑤;;簡(jiǎn)析WTO《原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則協(xié)議》[J];法制與社會(huì);2006年24期

3 孟國(guó)碧;;服務(wù)原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則設(shè)計(jì)的國(guó)際實(shí)踐及思考——兼評(píng)中國(guó)的實(shí)踐[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2008年01期

4 吳潔;;國(guó)際服務(wù)外包的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)及對(duì)策[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2007年05期

5 田寶峰;論公司法人國(guó)籍制度中幾個(gè)法律問(wèn)題及其對(duì)完善我國(guó)公司法律的啟示[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

6 張曉君;;服務(wù)貿(mào)易多邊法律制度的現(xiàn)狀、問(wèn)題與發(fā)展——以GATS為主線[J];湖湘論壇;2007年05期

7 Aaditya Mattoo ,Carsten Fink ,吳幼華,廖傳杰;論區(qū)域協(xié)定和服務(wù)貿(mào)易的政策問(wèn)題[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)資料譯叢;2005年03期

8 朱慈蘊(yùn);資本多數(shù)決原則與控制股東的誠(chéng)信義務(wù)[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年04期

9 厲力;;論原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則適用領(lǐng)域的擴(kuò)張[J];紹興文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

10 周云;戰(zhàn)pだ，

本文編號(hào)：2329725