服務貿(mào)易原產(chǎn)地的確定
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-13 16:45
【摘要】：當今,經(jīng)濟全球化深入發(fā)展,服務業(yè)在世界經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展中所占比重迅速擴張,其增長速度快于貨物貿(mào)易的增長。《服務貿(mào)易總協(xié)定》(GATS)就是在這種經(jīng)濟發(fā)展背景中產(chǎn)生,是全球范圍內(nèi)第一套規(guī)制國際服務貿(mào)易的多邊規(guī)則與框架體系。服務貿(mào)易領域逐漸成為國內(nèi)外學者關(guān)注的熱門課題,卻鮮有人對GATS條文進行細致解讀,特別是很少有人對服務貿(mào)易領域原產(chǎn)地確定這一個基礎理論問題進行關(guān)注和研究。出于當前這種研究現(xiàn)狀,筆者選取該問題進行初步研究。 整篇文章共三部分:引言、正文、結(jié)語。正文分四個章節(jié)進行闡述: 第一章是對服務貿(mào)易原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則概述。首先對原產(chǎn)地、原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則的概念、由來以及服務原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則的缺位現(xiàn)狀作出簡要介紹,接著通過總結(jié)服務貿(mào)易的特點闡述了服務原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則確立的必要性以及不能把貨物貿(mào)易原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則直接適用于服務貿(mào)易領域的原因。 第二章為分析GATS下的服務原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則。首先介紹了GATS劃分的四種服務提供方式,并將其分成兩類來探討服務來源問題。本部分著重于法人服務提供者的來源地識別,特別是在商業(yè)存在的情況下,應該區(qū)分多種情形。筆者引入“第三次歐共體香蕉案”與“加拿大汽車案”對這些標準做了實證分析和總結(jié)。 第三章是通過分析區(qū)域一體化協(xié)定及中國法律規(guī)范中的原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則作比較研究。本章分別總結(jié)和評價了NAFTA與歐盟服務原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則,并著重分析了以CEPA為代表的我國的服務原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則,而后對此進行了簡要評價。 第四章引入實質(zhì)性投入標準,以期解決GATS現(xiàn)有原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則存在的幾種適用困難的情形。筆者以貨物貿(mào)易領域的增值標準作為借鑒,分析實質(zhì)性投入標準的合理性、可行性及現(xiàn)實中可能存在的障礙問題,提出自己的思考及困惑。最后,筆者提出,這些問題并非短期內(nèi)可以解決,有賴于學界更多關(guān)注及GATS成員的進一步談判。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the deepening development of economic globalization, the proportion of service industry in the development of the world economy is expanding rapidly, and its growth rate is faster than that of trade in goods. The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) has emerged in this background of economic development. It is the first set of multilateral rules and framework to regulate international trade in services. The field of trade in services has gradually become a hot topic that scholars at home and abroad pay close attention to, but few people interpret the provisions of GATS in detail, especially few people pay attention to and study the basic theoretical issue of origin determination in the field of trade in services. In view of the present research situation, the author chooses this question to carry on the preliminary research. The whole article consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is an overview of rules of origin of trade in services. First of all, a brief introduction is made to the concept of origin, the origin of rules of origin and the status quo of the absence of rules of origin for services. Then the necessity of establishing rules of origin of services and the reasons why rules of origin of trade in goods can not be directly applied to the field of trade in services are expounded by summarizing the characteristics of trade in services. The second chapter analyzes the rules of origin under GATS. This paper first introduces four kinds of service providing methods divided by GATS, and divides them into two categories to discuss the problem of service source. This section focuses on the source identification of corporate service providers, especially in the case of commercial presence, should distinguish between multiple situations. The author introduces the third Banana case of EC and the car case of Canada to make an empirical analysis and summary of these standards. The third chapter makes a comparative study by analyzing the regional integration agreement and the rules of origin in China's legal norms. This chapter summarizes and evaluates the rules of origin of service in NAFTA and EU respectively, and analyzes the rules of origin of service in China, represented by CEPA, and then gives a brief evaluation. Chapter four introduces substantive input standard to solve the difficulties of GATS existing rules of origin. The author uses the value-added standards in the field of goods trade as a reference, analyzes the rationality, feasibility and possible obstacles in reality of substantive input standards, and puts forward his own thinking and confusion. Finally, the author points out that these problems can not be solved in the short term, but depend on more academic attention and further negotiation among GATS members.
【學位授予單位】：外交學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1;F746.18
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the deepening development of economic globalization, the proportion of service industry in the development of the world economy is expanding rapidly, and its growth rate is faster than that of trade in goods. The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) has emerged in this background of economic development. It is the first set of multilateral rules and framework to regulate international trade in services. The field of trade in services has gradually become a hot topic that scholars at home and abroad pay close attention to, but few people interpret the provisions of GATS in detail, especially few people pay attention to and study the basic theoretical issue of origin determination in the field of trade in services. In view of the present research situation, the author chooses this question to carry on the preliminary research. The whole article consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is an overview of rules of origin of trade in services. First of all, a brief introduction is made to the concept of origin, the origin of rules of origin and the status quo of the absence of rules of origin for services. Then the necessity of establishing rules of origin of services and the reasons why rules of origin of trade in goods can not be directly applied to the field of trade in services are expounded by summarizing the characteristics of trade in services. The second chapter analyzes the rules of origin under GATS. This paper first introduces four kinds of service providing methods divided by GATS, and divides them into two categories to discuss the problem of service source. This section focuses on the source identification of corporate service providers, especially in the case of commercial presence, should distinguish between multiple situations. The author introduces the third Banana case of EC and the car case of Canada to make an empirical analysis and summary of these standards. The third chapter makes a comparative study by analyzing the regional integration agreement and the rules of origin in China's legal norms. This chapter summarizes and evaluates the rules of origin of service in NAFTA and EU respectively, and analyzes the rules of origin of service in China, represented by CEPA, and then gives a brief evaluation. Chapter four introduces substantive input standard to solve the difficulties of GATS existing rules of origin. The author uses the value-added standards in the field of goods trade as a reference, analyzes the rationality, feasibility and possible obstacles in reality of substantive input standards, and puts forward his own thinking and confusion. Finally, the author points out that these problems can not be solved in the short term, but depend on more academic attention and further negotiation among GATS members.
【學位授予單位】：外交學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1;F746.18
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 石靜霞,胡榮國;區(qū)域經(jīng)濟一體化中的服務貿(mào)易問題[J];法學評論;2005年05期
2 姚瑤;;簡析WTO《原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則協(xié)議》[J];法制與社會;2006年24期
3 孟國碧;;服務原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則設計的國際實踐及思考——兼評中國的實踐[J];國際經(jīng)濟法學刊;2008年01期
4 吳潔;;國際服務外包的發(fā)展趨勢及對策[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2007年05期
5 田寶峰;論公司法人國籍制度中幾個法律問題及其對完善我國公司法律的啟示[J];甘肅政法成人教育學院學報;2004年01期
6 張曉君;;服務貿(mào)易多邊法律制度的現(xiàn)狀、問題與發(fā)展——以GATS為主線[J];湖湘論壇;2007年05期
7 Aaditya Mattoo ,Carsten Fink ,吳幼華,廖傳杰;論區(qū)域協(xié)定和服務貿(mào)易的政策問題[J];經(jīng)濟資料譯叢;2005年03期
8 朱慈蘊;資本多數(shù)決原則與控制股東的誠信義務[J];法學研究;2004年04期
9 厲力;;論原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則適用領域的擴張[J];紹興文理學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年01期
10 周云;戰(zhàn)pだ，
本文編號：2329725
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2329725.html
