【摘要】：隨著金融全球化浪潮的到來(lái),各國(guó)金融開放程度加大,市場(chǎng)間的聯(lián)系也日益緊密。這所有的一切,既給全球金融迅速發(fā)展帶來(lái)了難得的契機(jī),亦暗含了系統(tǒng)性危機(jī)再次大規(guī)模爆發(fā)的可能性。在金融全球化的浪潮下,各國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系日益密切:一方面,這有利于資本運(yùn)作;另一方面金融全球化的態(tài)勢(shì)也給各國(guó)各區(qū)域金融監(jiān)管帶來(lái)了系統(tǒng)性危機(jī)的挑戰(zhàn)。我們應(yīng)該如何迎接這個(gè)挑戰(zhàn)?盡管在現(xiàn)階段,建立一個(gè)有強(qiáng)制力的國(guó)際監(jiān)管者并不現(xiàn)實(shí);但是各金融監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)和金融監(jiān)管指導(dǎo)性意見制定機(jī)構(gòu)之間的合作,不僅有利于促進(jìn)監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的統(tǒng)一和金融業(yè)全球化發(fā)展,也有利于最終實(shí)現(xiàn)全球金融監(jiān)管的統(tǒng)一。 從現(xiàn)階段看來(lái),金融標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的趨同化發(fā)展和各國(guó)各地區(qū)的監(jiān)管合作是目前金融監(jiān)管系統(tǒng)化發(fā)展的最主流表現(xiàn)。強(qiáng)調(diào)合作,是因?yàn)樵诮鹑跈C(jī)構(gòu)聯(lián)系如此緊密的今天,金融業(yè)需要面對(duì)多種復(fù)雜交易以及跨國(guó)金融活動(dòng)所引發(fā)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。而任意一國(guó)或一個(gè)地區(qū)在金融監(jiān)管方面的單打獨(dú)斗,已經(jīng)不能符合金融全球化下金融業(yè)危機(jī)防范的要求了。堅(jiān)持宏觀審慎監(jiān)管與微觀審慎監(jiān)管相結(jié)合,并借助相關(guān)國(guó)際組織和各國(guó)監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)的合作以促進(jìn)金融監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的融合是控制系統(tǒng)性危機(jī)的有效手段。這個(gè)措施亦分別被國(guó)際性,區(qū)域性以及國(guó)內(nèi)監(jiān)管機(jī)制所認(rèn)可。英國(guó)的審慎監(jiān)管委員會(huì),美國(guó)的系統(tǒng)性危機(jī)委員會(huì),歐盟的系統(tǒng)性危機(jī)委員會(huì)和全球性的金融穩(wěn)定委員會(huì)的成立和運(yùn)作都證明了建立一個(gè)宏觀金融監(jiān)管機(jī)制對(duì)于防范系統(tǒng)性危機(jī)是十分有必要的。而要實(shí)現(xiàn)上述監(jiān)管模式穩(wěn)妥運(yùn)行,金融監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的趨同化是很重要的一步。國(guó)際法對(duì)于金融監(jiān)管的要求,區(qū)域金融監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn)統(tǒng)一,以及軟性指導(dǎo)性意見的廣泛普及,都促成了金融監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的統(tǒng)一化發(fā)展。 順應(yīng)國(guó)際潮流,我們不得不思索:金融業(yè)開始蓬勃發(fā)展的中國(guó)應(yīng)該如何防范于未然?分析我國(guó)金融法規(guī)體制以及金融監(jiān)管機(jī)制方面存在的問題是我們控制系統(tǒng)性危機(jī),保持我國(guó)金融市場(chǎng)穩(wěn)定性的前提。而探討如何順應(yīng)國(guó)際金融監(jiān)管改革的趨勢(shì)以提高我國(guó)金融監(jiān)管水平亦是我國(guó)金融監(jiān)管需要研究的重大課題。短時(shí)期內(nèi),我國(guó)以央行為中心,保監(jiān)會(huì),銀監(jiān)會(huì)和證監(jiān)會(huì)實(shí)行分業(yè)監(jiān)管的金融監(jiān)管機(jī)制不會(huì)改變,而金融業(yè)混業(yè)發(fā)展的趨勢(shì)卻日益明顯。面對(duì)這一矛盾現(xiàn)狀和我國(guó)金融監(jiān)管所存在的缺陷和漏洞:一方面,我們要加快國(guó)內(nèi)金融法改革,并建立起保監(jiān)會(huì),銀監(jiān)會(huì)和證監(jiān)會(huì)之間的溝通聯(lián)系機(jī)制,加強(qiáng)三個(gè)獨(dú)立監(jiān)管者之間的相互配合;另一方面,我們要加強(qiáng)國(guó)際合作,與其他國(guó)家和國(guó)際金融監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)共同努力規(guī)避系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。
[Abstract]:With the arrival of the wave of financial globalization, the degree of financial openness has increased, and the relationship between markets has become increasingly close. All this brings a rare opportunity for the rapid development of global finance, but also implies the possibility of another large-scale outbreak of systemic crisis. Under the tide of financial globalization, the economic relations of various countries are becoming closer and closer: on the one hand, this is beneficial to the operation of capital; on the other hand, the situation of financial globalization has also brought the challenge of systemic crisis to the financial supervision of all countries and regions. How should we meet this challenge? At this stage, though, it is not realistic to establish a mandatory international regulator; However, the cooperation between financial regulatory agencies and financial regulatory guidance organizations is not only conducive to the unification of regulatory standards and the globalization of the financial industry, but also conducive to the ultimate realization of the unification of global financial supervision. At the present stage, the convergence of financial standards and the regulatory cooperation between different countries and regions are the most mainstream manifestations of the systematized development of financial supervision. The emphasis on cooperation is due to the fact that the financial industry has to face many kinds of complex transactions and risks arising from transnational financial activities in a time when financial institutions are so closely linked. Any country or region in the financial supervision alone can not meet the requirements of financial crisis prevention under the financial globalization. Combining macro-prudential supervision with micro-prudential supervision and promoting the integration of financial regulatory standards with the cooperation of relevant international organizations and national regulatory agencies is an effective means to control the systemic crisis. This measure is also recognized by international, regional and domestic regulatory mechanisms. The Committee on prudential Supervision in the United Kingdom, the Committee on systemic crises in the United States, The establishment and operation of the European Union's systemic crisis Committee and the Global Financial Stability Board have proved that it is necessary to establish a macro-financial supervision mechanism to prevent the systemic crisis. The convergence of financial regulatory standards is an important step to realize the above regulatory model. The requirements of international law for financial supervision, the unification of regional financial supervision standards, and the widespread popularization of soft guidance have contributed to the unified development of financial supervision standards. In keeping with the international trend, we have to think: how should China, when the financial industry begins to flourish, guard against it? It is a prerequisite for us to control the systemic crisis and maintain the stability of our financial market by analyzing the problems existing in the financial regulation system and the financial supervision mechanism of our country. How to adapt to the trend of international financial supervision reform in order to improve the level of financial supervision in China is also an important subject that needs to be studied. In a short period of time, the financial supervision mechanism of China's central bank as the center, the Insurance Regulatory Commission, the Banking Regulatory Commission and the Securities Regulatory Commission implementing separate supervision will not change, but the trend of mixed development of financial industry is becoming more and more obvious. In the face of this contradiction and the defects and loopholes existing in financial supervision in China, on the one hand, we should speed up the reform of domestic financial law and establish a communication mechanism between the Insurance Regulatory Commission, the Banking Regulatory Commission and the Securities Regulatory Commission. Strengthening the coordination among the three independent regulators; On the other hand, we need to strengthen international cooperation and work with other national and international financial regulators to avoid systemic risks.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.2;D922.28

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王勇輝;高鑄;;亞洲債券基金對(duì)中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2011年03期

2 張漫雪;;金融消費(fèi)者保護(hù)的制度建議[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2011年06期

3 康亮;;后危機(jī)時(shí)代論我國(guó)資產(chǎn)證券化的發(fā)展——以一種道路和三方角色為視角[J];行政與法;2011年08期

4 陳冠來(lái);;淺析中國(guó)金融消費(fèi)者保護(hù)問題——以歐洲和中亞等中等收入九國(guó)為鑒[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2011年S6期

5 付凌艷;;“十二五”金融業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)的機(jī)理探析[J];中共南昌市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

6 楊軍華;;宏觀審慎監(jiān)管在系統(tǒng)性金融風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理中的作用[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2011年08期

7 賈小雷;劉媛;;英國(guó)金融申訴專員服務(wù)制度之述評(píng)[J];河北法學(xué);2011年09期

8 徐志林;;城市化進(jìn)程中社會(huì)治安問題的系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其防控[J];公安研究;2011年07期

9 ;國(guó)際(2010年9月4日-9月10日)[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：2318581