商事仲裁規(guī)則適用性法律問題研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-08 10:42
【摘要】：商事仲裁規(guī)則適用性問題是一個(gè)長期被仲裁學(xué)界忽視的涉及仲裁規(guī)則的重大問題。臨時(shí)仲裁應(yīng)選擇適用諸如UNCITRAL仲裁規(guī)則等成熟而規(guī)范的既存仲裁規(guī)則;當(dāng)事人選擇仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)應(yīng)視為原則上同意適用仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)仲裁規(guī)則,但當(dāng)事人對機(jī)構(gòu)仲裁規(guī)則具有適當(dāng)修改權(quán);在仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)沒有作相反規(guī)定的前提下,臨時(shí)仲裁規(guī)則亦可適用于機(jī)構(gòu)仲裁中;仲裁規(guī)則的適用本來與仲裁協(xié)議效力的認(rèn)定并無關(guān)系,但因我國將對仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)的約定作為仲裁協(xié)議生效要件之一,因而當(dāng)事人選擇適用仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)仲裁規(guī)則并不意味著仲裁協(xié)議有效,可通過仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)仲裁規(guī)則推定當(dāng)事人同意仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)對案件具有管轄權(quán),從而肯定此類仲裁協(xié)議的效力。
[Abstract]:The applicability of commercial arbitration rules is a major issue concerning arbitration rules which has long been neglected by arbitration scholars. The provisional arbitration should choose the existing arbitration rules, such as the UNCITRAL arbitration rules, and the parties choosing the arbitration institution should be regarded as agreeing in principle to the application of the arbitration rules of the arbitration institution, but the parties have the right to modify the institutional arbitration rules appropriately. If the arbitration institution does not make any provision to the contrary, the provisional arbitration rules may also be applied to institutional arbitration; The application of arbitration rules had nothing to do with the determination of the validity of the arbitration agreement, but the agreement of the arbitration institution was taken as one of the effective elements of the arbitration agreement in our country. Therefore, the parties' choice to apply arbitration rules does not mean that the arbitration agreement is valid. The arbitration rules of arbitration institution can be used to presume that the parties agree that the arbitration institution has jurisdiction over the case, thus confirming the validity of such arbitration agreement.
【作者單位】： 南方醫(yī)科大學(xué)人文與管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：廣東省哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)“十一五”規(guī)劃2010年度后期資助項(xiàng)目(GD10HFX02)
【分類號】：D997.4;D925.7
本文編號：2318222
[Abstract]:The applicability of commercial arbitration rules is a major issue concerning arbitration rules which has long been neglected by arbitration scholars. The provisional arbitration should choose the existing arbitration rules, such as the UNCITRAL arbitration rules, and the parties choosing the arbitration institution should be regarded as agreeing in principle to the application of the arbitration rules of the arbitration institution, but the parties have the right to modify the institutional arbitration rules appropriately. If the arbitration institution does not make any provision to the contrary, the provisional arbitration rules may also be applied to institutional arbitration; The application of arbitration rules had nothing to do with the determination of the validity of the arbitration agreement, but the agreement of the arbitration institution was taken as one of the effective elements of the arbitration agreement in our country. Therefore, the parties' choice to apply arbitration rules does not mean that the arbitration agreement is valid. The arbitration rules of arbitration institution can be used to presume that the parties agree that the arbitration institution has jurisdiction over the case, thus confirming the validity of such arbitration agreement.
【作者單位】： 南方醫(yī)科大學(xué)人文與管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：廣東省哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)“十一五”規(guī)劃2010年度后期資助項(xiàng)目(GD10HFX02)
【分類號】：D997.4;D925.7
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 趙秀文;;論仲裁規(guī)則的適用與國際商事仲裁協(xié)議有效性的認(rèn)定[J];北京仲裁;2006年04期
【二級參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 趙秀文;論法律意義上的仲裁地點(diǎn)及其確定[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2005年01期
，本文編號：2318222
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2318222.html
最近更新
教材專著
