投資者—國家間爭端解決仲裁機(jī)制研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-22 12:49
【摘要】：隨著當(dāng)前世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的深入發(fā)展以及國際投資自由化程度的提高,以條約為基礎(chǔ)的解決投資者與投資東道國間投資爭議的國際仲裁機(jī)制,在其自身國際商事仲裁屬性所致缺陷尚未解決的背景下,又迎來了新的法律問題。隨著各國吸引外資和鼓勵對外投資政策的深入推進(jìn),國際投資環(huán)境整體改善。與此同時,近年投資者-國家間仲裁案件數(shù)量呈快速上升趨勢,這一趨勢反映了投資者-國家間爭端解決仲裁機(jī)制的重要特點。在對中外投資協(xié)定內(nèi)容比較分析的基礎(chǔ)之上,審視投資者-國家間仲裁機(jī)制面臨的重要問題,并根據(jù)投資者-國家間仲裁實踐的新發(fā)展,完善中外投資條約的相關(guān)規(guī)定,顯得尤為必要。 本文除引言和結(jié)論外,正文分為四個部分。 第一部分概述了以條約為基礎(chǔ)的投資者-國家間爭端解決仲裁機(jī)制。首先,就這一機(jī)制形成的歷史和近年發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行簡要闡述。其次,就這一機(jī)制主要基礎(chǔ)概念進(jìn)行闡述。 第二部分分析了以條約為基礎(chǔ)的投資者-國家間爭端解決仲裁機(jī)制的管轄權(quán)問題,其中闡述了以條約為基礎(chǔ)的投資者-國家間爭端管轄權(quán)基礎(chǔ),并對當(dāng)前最為重要的投資者-國家間爭端解決機(jī)制的實現(xiàn)機(jī)制之一,即ICSID仲裁管轄權(quán)特殊性進(jìn)行論述。 第三部分論述了投資者-國家間爭端解決仲裁的法律適用問題,包括仲裁程序方面的法律適用問題和仲裁實體方面的法律適用問題。 第四部分通過對投資者-國家間仲裁發(fā)展實踐中的具體問題進(jìn)行分析,并逐一提出針對我國的啟示。首先就當(dāng)前投資者-國家間爭端解決仲裁機(jī)制的裁決一致性存在的問題進(jìn)行闡述,并針對性的提出中國在對外締結(jié)相關(guān)投資條約時就該問題應(yīng)采取的應(yīng)對方法。其次通過對NAFTA仲裁案件中公正與公平待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)內(nèi)涵的發(fā)展變化,進(jìn)一步提出中外投資條約中應(yīng)完善內(nèi)容。再次就阿根廷危機(jī)引起的就該國提起的仲裁案件數(shù)量顯著增加問題進(jìn)行了分析,并從中尋找對中國的重要啟示。最后就近年出現(xiàn)的部分國家退出公約并終止BIT的現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行分析,提出中國的應(yīng)對之策。 本文通過對國際投資仲裁實踐中具體問題的分析,以投資者-國家間爭端解決仲裁案件裁決為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合本國實際,從實證的角度就本國投資者和國家利益的維護(hù),提出重要應(yīng)對之策。
[Abstract]:With the deepening development of the current world economy and the improvement of the degree of international investment liberalization, the treaty-based international arbitration mechanism for the settlement of investment disputes between investors and host countries of investment, Under the background that the defects caused by its own attribute of international commercial arbitration have not been resolved, it ushered in new legal problems. The overall international investment environment has improved with the deepening of policies to attract foreign investment and encourage foreign investment. At the same time, the number of investor-state arbitration cases has increased rapidly in recent years, which reflects the important characteristics of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism. On the basis of comparative analysis of the contents of Sino-foreign investment agreements, this paper examines the important problems faced by investor-state arbitration mechanism, and consummates the relevant provisions of Sino-foreign investment treaties according to the new development of investor-state arbitration practice. It is especially necessary. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the text is divided into four parts. The first part summarizes the investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism based on treaty. First of all, the formation of this mechanism and the recent development of the history of a brief description. Secondly, the main basic concepts of this mechanism are expounded. The second part analyzes the jurisdiction of treaty-based investor-State dispute settlement arbitration mechanism, which describes the treaty-based basis of investor-State dispute jurisdiction. It also discusses the particularity of ICSID arbitration jurisdiction, one of the most important investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms. The third part discusses the legal application of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration, including the legal application of arbitration procedure and arbitration entity. The fourth part analyzes the specific problems in the practice of investor-state arbitration and puts forward the enlightenment one by one for our country. First of all, this paper expounds the problems existing in the consistency of the adjudication of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism, and puts forward the countermeasures that China should take when concluding the relevant investment treaties with foreign countries. Secondly, through the development and change of the standard of fair and equitable treatment in NAFTA arbitration cases, the author puts forward that the contents of Chinese and foreign investment treaties should be improved. In this paper, the author analyzes the significant increase in the number of arbitration cases brought about by the Argentine crisis, and looks for some important implications for China. Finally, this paper analyzes the phenomenon of some countries withdrawing from the convention and terminating BIT in recent years, and puts forward China's countermeasures. Based on the analysis of the specific problems in the practice of international investment arbitration, this paper, on the basis of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration case award, combines the reality of our country, and from the empirical point of view, discusses the protection of national investors and national interests. Put forward important countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.4
本文編號：2287202
[Abstract]:With the deepening development of the current world economy and the improvement of the degree of international investment liberalization, the treaty-based international arbitration mechanism for the settlement of investment disputes between investors and host countries of investment, Under the background that the defects caused by its own attribute of international commercial arbitration have not been resolved, it ushered in new legal problems. The overall international investment environment has improved with the deepening of policies to attract foreign investment and encourage foreign investment. At the same time, the number of investor-state arbitration cases has increased rapidly in recent years, which reflects the important characteristics of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism. On the basis of comparative analysis of the contents of Sino-foreign investment agreements, this paper examines the important problems faced by investor-state arbitration mechanism, and consummates the relevant provisions of Sino-foreign investment treaties according to the new development of investor-state arbitration practice. It is especially necessary. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the text is divided into four parts. The first part summarizes the investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism based on treaty. First of all, the formation of this mechanism and the recent development of the history of a brief description. Secondly, the main basic concepts of this mechanism are expounded. The second part analyzes the jurisdiction of treaty-based investor-State dispute settlement arbitration mechanism, which describes the treaty-based basis of investor-State dispute jurisdiction. It also discusses the particularity of ICSID arbitration jurisdiction, one of the most important investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms. The third part discusses the legal application of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration, including the legal application of arbitration procedure and arbitration entity. The fourth part analyzes the specific problems in the practice of investor-state arbitration and puts forward the enlightenment one by one for our country. First of all, this paper expounds the problems existing in the consistency of the adjudication of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism, and puts forward the countermeasures that China should take when concluding the relevant investment treaties with foreign countries. Secondly, through the development and change of the standard of fair and equitable treatment in NAFTA arbitration cases, the author puts forward that the contents of Chinese and foreign investment treaties should be improved. In this paper, the author analyzes the significant increase in the number of arbitration cases brought about by the Argentine crisis, and looks for some important implications for China. Finally, this paper analyzes the phenomenon of some countries withdrawing from the convention and terminating BIT in recent years, and puts forward China's countermeasures. Based on the analysis of the specific problems in the practice of international investment arbitration, this paper, on the basis of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration case award, combines the reality of our country, and from the empirical point of view, discusses the protection of national investors and national interests. Put forward important countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.4
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 葉興平;《北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定》爭端解決機(jī)制的創(chuàng)新及意義[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年07期
2 沈慧驊;國家和私人間投資爭端解決機(jī)制的沖突和協(xié)調(diào)——兼比較WTO與ICSID爭端解決機(jī)制的沖突和協(xié)調(diào)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年11期
3 劉筍;;國際投資仲裁裁決的不一致性問題及其解決[J];法商研究;2009年06期
4 向玉蘭;;“BIT條款”和“協(xié)議條款”對ICSID管轄權(quán)的影響[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年01期
5 蔡從燕;;外國投資者利用國際投資仲裁機(jī)制新發(fā)展反思——國際法實施機(jī)制與南北矛盾的雙重視角[J];法學(xué)家;2007年03期
6 黃華;;國際投資仲裁研究及上訴機(jī)制探討[J];法制與社會;2009年34期
7 陳安;;中外雙邊投資協(xié)定中的四大“安全閥”不宜貿(mào)然拆除——美、加型BITs談判范本關(guān)鍵性“爭端解決”條款剖析[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2006年01期
8 李萬強(qiáng);;晚近美國對國際投資爭端仲裁機(jī)制態(tài)度的轉(zhuǎn)變——以NAFTA為例[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2006年01期
9 沈志韜;;論國際投資仲裁正當(dāng)性危機(jī)[J];時代法學(xué);2010年02期
10 梁丹妮;;美式投資條約的新近發(fā)展對中國的啟示[J];云南社會科學(xué);2007年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 石慧;以條約為基礎(chǔ)的投資者與國家間仲裁機(jī)制的評判[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2007年
2 林愛民;國際投資協(xié)定爭議仲裁研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 馬凌;國際投資爭端解決機(jī)制的構(gòu)建研究[D];天津財經(jīng)學(xué)院;2005年
2 馬迅;《北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定》第十一章爭議解決機(jī)制研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年
3 林笑霞;國際投資仲裁中危急情況的適用[D];廈門大學(xué);2009年
，本文編號：2287202
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2287202.html
最近更新
教材專著
