“第二含義”商標(biāo)法律保護研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-10 17:53
【摘要】：保護“第二含義”商標(biāo)的相關(guān)規(guī)則首先在英國法院中被提出來,后來被美國法院所發(fā)展,如今已納入包括《TRIPS協(xié)定》、《巴黎公約》在內(nèi)的國際公約,并成為世界各國商標(biāo)法共同的法律制度。 文章采取比較分析方法和實證分析方法,探索“第二含義”商標(biāo)的基本理論、適用范圍、判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及合理使用。通過細致比較研究國外對“第二含義”商標(biāo)的相關(guān)立法和實踐經(jīng)驗,并結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)行《商標(biāo)法》有關(guān)“第二含義”商標(biāo)保護的立法及司法現(xiàn)狀,指出我國“第二含義”商標(biāo)法律保護存在的問題,提出完善我國“第二含義”商標(biāo)法律保護制度的相關(guān)建議,具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。 文章分為五部分。第一部分為“第二含義”商標(biāo)概述。主要介紹了“第二含義”商標(biāo)的概念、特征,以及“第二含義”與“第一含義”關(guān)系這三方面內(nèi)容。 第二部分為保護“第二含義”商標(biāo)的正當(dāng)性基礎(chǔ)。主要從商標(biāo)顯著性的本質(zhì)屬性、商標(biāo)法的立法目的、公平正義原則三個方面來論證保護“第二含義”商標(biāo)的合理性。 第三部分為“第二含義”商標(biāo)法律保護的比較法研究。首先簡要介紹了《巴黎公約》和《TRIPS協(xié)定》兩個國際公約對“第二含義”商標(biāo)的立法規(guī)定,其次重點介紹了其他國家有關(guān)“第二含義”商標(biāo)的相關(guān)立法與司法實踐,以此總結(jié)分析國外有關(guān)“第二含義”商標(biāo)適用范圍、判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的成熟做法。 第四部分為我國“第二含義”商標(biāo)的立法與實踐。通過分析我國有關(guān)“第二含義”商標(biāo)的立法現(xiàn)狀,以及對司法實踐中“小肥羊”、“解百納”和“紅河”三個典型案例的剖析,揭示我國“第二含義”商標(biāo)法律保護面臨的困境,凸顯出我國“第二含義”商標(biāo)在適用、判斷中存在的突出問題。 第五部分為我國“第二含義”商標(biāo)保護制度的完善。該部分在借鑒國外先進立法與實踐經(jīng)驗的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國商標(biāo)實踐的現(xiàn)實需求和可操作性要求,提出確立我國“第二含義”法律適用原則,完善“第二含義”商標(biāo)適用范圍、“描述性標(biāo)志”和“第二含義”商標(biāo)判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及“第二含義”商標(biāo)合理使用的相關(guān)立法建議。
[Abstract]:Rules relating to the protection of "second meaning" trademarks were first proposed in British courts, later developed by American courts and now included in international conventions, including the TRIPS Agreement, the Paris Convention, And become the common legal system of trademark law all over the world. This paper adopts comparative analysis method and empirical analysis method to explore the basic theory, applicable scope, judgment standard and reasonable use of "second meaning" trademark. By comparing and studying the relevant legislation and practical experience of the "second meaning" trademark in foreign countries, and combining with the current legislation and judicial situation of the "second meaning" trademark protection in the Trademark Law of our country, It is of great practical significance to point out the problems existing in the legal protection of trademark in the second meaning of our country, and to put forward some suggestions on how to perfect the legal protection system of trademark in the second meaning of our country. The article is divided into five parts. The first part is "the second meaning" trademark outline. This paper mainly introduces the concept and characteristics of "second meaning" trademark and the relationship between "second meaning" and "first meaning". The second part is the legitimacy foundation of protecting the second meaning trademark. The rationality of the protection of "second meaning" trademark is demonstrated from three aspects: the essential attribute of trademark salience, the legislative purpose of trademark law and the principle of fairness and justice. The third part is the comparative study of the legal protection of trademark in the second meaning. First of all, it briefly introduces the legislative provisions of the "second meaning" trademark in the Paris Convention and the TRIPS Agreement, and then focuses on the relevant legislation and judicial practice of other countries concerning the "second meaning" trademark. This paper summarizes and analyzes the mature practices of the foreign countries about the scope of trademark application and the standard of judging the "second meaning" trademark. The fourth part is the legislation and practice of the second meaning trademark in our country. By analyzing the legislation status of the trademark of "second meaning" in our country, and the analysis of three typical cases of "Little Sheep", "Cabernet" and "Red River" in judicial practice, This paper reveals the dilemma of the legal protection of the "second meaning" trademark in our country, and highlights the outstanding problems existing in the application and judgment of the "second meaning" trademark in our country. The fifth part is the perfection of trademark protection system of the second meaning of our country. On the basis of drawing lessons from foreign advanced legislation and practical experience, combined with the practical demand and operational requirements of trademark practice in our country, this part puts forward the establishment of the applicable principle of "second meaning" law in our country, and the perfection of the scope of trademark application of "second meaning". The standard of judging the trademark of descriptive mark and the second meaning, and the relevant legislative suggestion on the rational use of the trademark of the second meaning.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.1;D923.43
[Abstract]:Rules relating to the protection of "second meaning" trademarks were first proposed in British courts, later developed by American courts and now included in international conventions, including the TRIPS Agreement, the Paris Convention, And become the common legal system of trademark law all over the world. This paper adopts comparative analysis method and empirical analysis method to explore the basic theory, applicable scope, judgment standard and reasonable use of "second meaning" trademark. By comparing and studying the relevant legislation and practical experience of the "second meaning" trademark in foreign countries, and combining with the current legislation and judicial situation of the "second meaning" trademark protection in the Trademark Law of our country, It is of great practical significance to point out the problems existing in the legal protection of trademark in the second meaning of our country, and to put forward some suggestions on how to perfect the legal protection system of trademark in the second meaning of our country. The article is divided into five parts. The first part is "the second meaning" trademark outline. This paper mainly introduces the concept and characteristics of "second meaning" trademark and the relationship between "second meaning" and "first meaning". The second part is the legitimacy foundation of protecting the second meaning trademark. The rationality of the protection of "second meaning" trademark is demonstrated from three aspects: the essential attribute of trademark salience, the legislative purpose of trademark law and the principle of fairness and justice. The third part is the comparative study of the legal protection of trademark in the second meaning. First of all, it briefly introduces the legislative provisions of the "second meaning" trademark in the Paris Convention and the TRIPS Agreement, and then focuses on the relevant legislation and judicial practice of other countries concerning the "second meaning" trademark. This paper summarizes and analyzes the mature practices of the foreign countries about the scope of trademark application and the standard of judging the "second meaning" trademark. The fourth part is the legislation and practice of the second meaning trademark in our country. By analyzing the legislation status of the trademark of "second meaning" in our country, and the analysis of three typical cases of "Little Sheep", "Cabernet" and "Red River" in judicial practice, This paper reveals the dilemma of the legal protection of the "second meaning" trademark in our country, and highlights the outstanding problems existing in the application and judgment of the "second meaning" trademark in our country. The fifth part is the perfection of trademark protection system of the second meaning of our country. On the basis of drawing lessons from foreign advanced legislation and practical experience, combined with the practical demand and operational requirements of trademark practice in our country, this part puts forward the establishment of the applicable principle of "second meaning" law in our country, and the perfection of the scope of trademark application of "second meaning". The standard of judging the trademark of descriptive mark and the second meaning, and the relevant legislative suggestion on the rational use of the trademark of the second meaning.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.1;D923.43
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 朱e，
本文編號：2262729
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2262729.html
