【摘要】：隨著海峽兩岸經(jīng)濟(jì)文化交流的進(jìn)一步加深，兩岸人員之間的婚姻締結(jié)日益頻繁，因此，海峽兩岸不可避免地涉及到相互承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行離婚判決的問(wèn)題。然而目前海峽兩岸并未就該問(wèn)題達(dá)成任何協(xié)議，而是各自根據(jù)己方法域的單獨(dú)規(guī)定就離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行進(jìn)行操作。在本文中，筆者將對(duì)目前海峽兩岸承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行對(duì)方法域離婚判決之相關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行梳理，通過(guò)借鑒一些國(guó)際上的做法為促進(jìn)海峽兩岸進(jìn)一步推動(dòng)離婚判決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行提出建議。本文共四章。 第一部分主要界定了離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行涉及的相關(guān)概念。對(duì)于判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行領(lǐng)域中的“判決”概念，學(xué)者的觀點(diǎn)主要分為兩類(lèi)：一類(lèi)是狹義上的“法院判決”，另一類(lèi)則是廣義上的“判決”。針對(duì)此分歧，筆者在文章中進(jìn)行了相關(guān)的分析和界定。除此之外，筆者還就判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的關(guān)系、離婚判決書(shū)的范圍作出了界定，為后面的文章分析奠定了基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分主要介紹了國(guó)際社會(huì)針對(duì)離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的做法，以及在借鑒外國(guó)做法時(shí)獲得的一些啟示。本章分為三個(gè)小部分，分別介紹了其他大陸法系國(guó)家對(duì)于外國(guó)離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的制度、英美法系國(guó)家如何對(duì)待區(qū)際離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行制度以及國(guó)際條約的一些通行做法。筆者認(rèn)為，目前海峽兩岸司法獨(dú)立且同屬于大陸法系，因此可以借鑒大陸法系國(guó)家對(duì)于外國(guó)離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的一些制度；同時(shí)海峽兩岸又屬于同一國(guó)家不同法域，因此英國(guó)、美國(guó)處理區(qū)際之間的離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行制度對(duì)于處理兩岸間離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行也有一定的積極作用。最后，筆者介紹了國(guó)際條約中關(guān)于離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行制度，希望能從中吸取一些養(yǎng)分為海峽兩岸解決離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行提供一些新的思路。 第三部分主要在梳理海峽兩岸離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行制度上，就如何促進(jìn)海峽兩岸離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行提出一些建議。本章首先介紹了目前海峽兩岸離婚判決認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行的立法現(xiàn)狀；其次，就海峽兩岸離婚判決認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行中的一些問(wèn)題提出自己的見(jiàn)解；最后，針對(duì)這些問(wèn)題，筆者提出了一些促進(jìn)兩岸離婚判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的建議。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the economic and cultural exchanges between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, the marriage between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is becoming more and more frequent. Therefore, the issue of mutual recognition and execution of divorce judgments between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is inevitably involved. However, at present, the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have not reached any agreement on this issue, but have operated on the recognition and enforcement of divorce judgments in accordance with the separate provisions of their respective jurisdictions. In this paper, the author will comb the relevant provisions on the recognition and execution of divorce judgments in the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and put forward some suggestions for promoting the recognition and enforcement of divorce judgments in the two sides of the Taiwan Strait by using some international practices for reference. There are four chapters in this paper. The first part mainly defines the related concepts involved in the recognition and enforcement of divorce judgment. As for the concept of "judgment" in the field of judgment recognition and enforcement, scholars' views are divided into two categories: one is "court judgment" in a narrow sense, the other is "judgment" in a broad sense. In view of this difference, the author carries on the related analysis and the definition in the article. In addition, the author defines the relationship between judgment recognition and execution and the scope of divorce judgment, which lays a foundation for the analysis of the following article. The second part mainly introduces the international practice of recognition and enforcement of divorce judgment, as well as some enlightenment when drawing lessons from foreign practices. This chapter is divided into three parts. It introduces the system of recognition and enforcement of foreign divorce judgment in other civil law countries, how to deal with the system of recognition and enforcement of inter-regional divorce judgment and some common practices of international treaties in common law countries. The author believes that the judicial independence of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is both civil law systems, so we can learn from the recognition and enforcement of foreign divorce judgments in civil law countries; at the same time, the two sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to different jurisdictions in the same country. Therefore, the United Kingdom and the United States deal with the system of recognition and enforcement of inter-regional divorce judgments, which also play a positive role in handling the recognition and enforcement of divorce judgments between the two sides of the strait. Finally, the author introduces the system of recognition and enforcement of divorce judgment in international treaties, hoping to draw some nutrients from it and provide some new ideas for the recognition and enforcement of divorce judgments in both sides of the Taiwan Strait. The third part puts forward some suggestions on how to promote the recognition and enforcement of divorce judgment on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. This chapter first introduces the current status of legislation on the recognition and enforcement of divorce judgments on both sides of the Taiwan Strait; secondly, it puts forward its own views on some issues in the recognition and enforcement of divorce judgments on both sides of the Taiwan Strait; finally, aiming at these problems, The author puts forward some suggestions to promote the recognition and enforcement of divorce judgment on both sides of the strait.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱維究;臺(tái)灣當(dāng)局“涉及兩岸關(guān)系立法”之研究[J];比較法研究;1999年Z1期

2 李薇薇;論《布魯塞爾公約》與外國(guó)民商事判決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[J];中國(guó)司法;2000年05期

3 徐崇利;;兩岸民商事法律沖突的性質(zhì)及立法設(shè)計(jì)[J];廈門(mén)大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2003年02期

4 徐宏;;論一國(guó)兩制下香港與內(nèi)地的民事司法協(xié)助[J];法學(xué)家;1996年06期

5 杜志華;歐盟統(tǒng)一國(guó)際私法的最新發(fā)展——《婚姻事項(xiàng)管轄權(quán)及判決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行公約》簡(jiǎn)析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年06期

6 郭玉軍,向在勝;歐盟《民商事管轄權(quán)及判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行條例》介評(píng)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年02期

7 李新天;論大陸與香港司法協(xié)助的模式[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1997年02期

8 喬慧娟;;論臺(tái)灣地區(qū)承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行大陸民商事判決中的既判力問(wèn)題[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

9 李夢(mèng)舟;祖國(guó)大陸法院的民事判決到臺(tái)灣地方法院申請(qǐng)認(rèn)可和強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行的法律實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題[J];兩岸關(guān)系;2000年04期

10 劉懿彤;;德國(guó)對(duì)外國(guó)離婚判決和決定的承認(rèn)[J];南京大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2006年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 肖芳;離婚的國(guó)際私法問(wèn)題研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

2 劉冰;外國(guó)法院判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

3 李雪琴;論域外法院判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行中的管轄權(quán)審查[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

4 趙s，

本文編號(hào)：2254975