反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定研究
[Abstract]:The Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) is the latest intellectual property agreement concluded in 2011 by the United States, European Union, Japan and other intellectual property powers. The Convention puts forward the latest requirements for the protection of international intellectual property rights in the areas of civil tort relief, border measures, criminal liability, law enforcement in the digital environment and international cooperation. ACTA represents the latest trend of international intellectual property protection. Compared with (TRIPS), there is a certain inheritance relationship, but the requirement of "super TRIPS" is put forward in many aspects. Compared with the current intellectual property legal system in China, ACTA has surpassed the existing level of protection in some respects. In view of international politics, industrial policy and other related factors, China is unlikely to join the treaty in the near future. But even so, ACTA will still have a great impact on China's foreign trade, so our government and enterprises should be prepared to deal with it. This paper includes three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text consists of four chapters. Chapter 1: Overview of anti-counterfeiting trade agreements. In view of the fact that ACTA is the newly concluded international treaty, this chapter mainly introduces the background of the establishment of ACTA, the main content of the newly introduced intellectual property protection system and the characteristics of ACTA. Chapter 2: the relationship between anti-counterfeiting trade agreement and TRIPS agreement. Trips occupies the most important position in the current international intellectual property protection system. Because ACTA is further developed on the basis of TRIPS protocol, there is a certain inheritance relationship between them. But in the specific law enforcement measures ACTA also has a lot of new highlights. Chapter 3: the comparison between anti-counterfeiting trade agreement and our current intellectual property law system. Although there is little possibility of China joining ACTA, the developed countries will not allow China to stay out of the agreement for a long time. Therefore, this chapter is mainly about the comparative study of ACTA and intellectual property law of our country. Chapter 4: the possible impact of anti-counterfeiting trade agreements and our countermeasures. ACTA, as the latest practice of international intellectual property protection, has itself created many new regulations. Will have an important impact on the protection of international intellectual property rights and the development of international trade. As the United States and the European Union are the most important trading partners of our country, even if China does not join the ACTA, agreement itself, it will have an important impact on China's foreign trade. Therefore, this chapter puts forward some countermeasures from the two angles of government and enterprise.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D996.1;D997.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉科;;中國貫徹《TRIPS協(xié)定》刑事措施中的若干問題[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年01期
2 馮漢橋;;對外貿(mào)易中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法與司法保護(hù)協(xié)調(diào)問題研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年12期
3 衣淑玲;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》談判述評[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年07期
4 薛潔;;走近《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)議》(ACTA) 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)民事執(zhí)法部分初探[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年07期
5 袁真富;鄭舒姝;徐洋;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的主要特點及其現(xiàn)實影響[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期
6 崔國斌;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)議》與中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法的比較研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期
7 程文婷;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》與我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法比較芻議[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期
8 萬鄂湘,馮潔菡;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際保護(hù)的新發(fā)展[J];法律適用;2003年07期
9 楊鴻;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法規(guī)則研究[J];法商研究;2011年06期
10 李宗輝;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》(ACTA)的“表”與“里”[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期
,本文編號:2250113
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2250113.html