【摘要】：議付是指定銀行在相符交單下,在其應(yīng)獲償付的銀行工作日當(dāng)天或之前向受益人預(yù)付或者同意預(yù)付款項,從而購買匯票及＼或單據(jù)的行為。議付行在信用證議付流程中處于核心地位,但關(guān)于其法律地位卻一直存在爭議,其與開證行、受益人的權(quán)利義務(wù)劃分也得不到明晰。筆者希望通過梳理國際慣例及操作實務(wù),為信用證議付規(guī)則的完善提供參考及幫助。 本文第一章分析了議付的定義、性質(zhì),指出了UCP600對議付定義的完善之處,分析出議付兼具融資及買入?yún)R票＼單據(jù)的法律性質(zhì)。第二章評析了關(guān)于議付行在信用證交易中法律地位的理論,包括開證行之代理人說、受益人之代理人說、正當(dāng)持票人說及債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移說,認(rèn)為上述學(xué)說都不能解決議付行的法律地位問題。本人經(jīng)研究,認(rèn)為議付行應(yīng)為獨立的議付法律關(guān)系的主體。 本文第三章通過研究UCP600的規(guī)定及信用證實務(wù),總結(jié)出議付行對開證行、受益人、單證及貨物的權(quán)利以及免責(zé)權(quán),并歸納了議付行應(yīng)承擔(dān)的義務(wù)。第四章就理論界較為關(guān)注的議付行對受益人的追索權(quán)問題進(jìn)行了深入研究,分析了議付行是否具有追索權(quán)、享有議付權(quán)的情形及追索權(quán)法律依據(jù)的問題。第五章詳細(xì)分析了議付行對所持提單的權(quán)利,第六章分析了議付行的風(fēng)險來源并提出具體的風(fēng)險防范措施。最后,文章第六章就完善信用證議付的司法解釋提出了建議,認(rèn)為司法解釋要明確議付行獨立的議付法律關(guān)系主體的地位,闡明議付行對所持提單的權(quán)利為所有權(quán),明確追索權(quán)的適用情形。
[Abstract]:Negotiation refers to the act of specifying a bank to prepay or agree to prepay the beneficiary's draft and/or documents on or before the working day of the bank payable under a compliance document. The negotiating bank is at the core of the negotiation process of a letter of credit, but its legal status has been controversial with the issuing bank. The author hopes to provide reference and help for the improvement of L/C negotiation rules by combing international practices and operational practices.
Chapter 1 analyzes the definition and nature of negotiation, points out the perfection of UCP600's definition of negotiation, and analyzes the legal nature of negotiation with both financing and purchasing bills of exchange. Chapter 2 reviews the theory of the legal status of negotiating banks in L/C transactions, including the agent of the issuing bank and the agent of the beneficiary. The holder of the Bill said that the theory of transfer of creditor's rights could not solve the legal status of the negotiating bank.
Chapter 3 summarizes the rights and exemptions of negotiating banks to issuing banks, beneficiaries, documents and goods, and concludes the obligations of negotiating banks. Chapter 4 makes a thorough study of the right of recourse of beneficiaries by negotiating banks, which are concerned by theoretical circles. Chapter 5 analyzes the rights of negotiating bank to the bill of lading in detail, Chapter 6 analyzes the sources of risks of negotiating bank and puts forward specific risk prevention measures. Finally, Chapter 6 puts forward suggestions on improving the judicial interpretation of L/C negotiation. For judicial interpretation, it is necessary to clarify the status of the negotiating bank as the subject of independent negotiation legal relationship, clarify that the right of the negotiating bank to hold the bill of lading is the ownership, and clarify the application of the right of recourse.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邵新力;信用證指定銀行法律地位及權(quán)責(zé)探析[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2000年10期

2 姜世波;議付信用證若干法律問題探討[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2003年03期

3 金賽波;馮守華;;議付信用證下議付行對受益人的追索權(quán)問題[J];國際商務(wù).對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報;1997年06期

4 何家寶;信用證與匯票法律關(guān)系比較研究[J];法學(xué);2003年04期

5 王參;;論信用證議付法律關(guān)系[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2009年03期

6 楊姝;;論議付信用證下的權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系[J];法制與社會;2008年20期

7 劉國運(yùn);;論信用證交易中議付行的法律地位[J];法制與社會;2009年02期

8 李金澤;議付信用證當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利義務(wù)分析[J];杭州金融研修學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年05期

9 李金澤;自由議付與限制性議付信用證的表征與識別[J];海南金融;2001年10期

10 易明;;論信用證議付行的法律地位[J];江西金融職工大學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 柯春欣;跟單信用證下匯票法律問題研究[D];清華大學(xué);2004年

2 王成;論開證行與議付行之間的法律關(guān)系[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

3 李露;正當(dāng)持票人規(guī)則在信用證下的重構(gòu)[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

4 許妍;我國信用證業(yè)務(wù)中議付行及其索償問題研究[D];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2245972