【摘要】：近年來(lái),伴隨著國(guó)際投資自由化、便利化、一體化的發(fā)展,國(guó)際直接投資發(fā)展迅速,外國(guó)投資者與東道國(guó)之間的國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端的數(shù)量也呈現(xiàn)日益上升的趨勢(shì),并且投資爭(zhēng)端的趨勢(shì)也從以往的“政治性爭(zhēng)端”逐漸向“管理性爭(zhēng)端”轉(zhuǎn)變�！氨Ｗo(hù)傘條款”作為發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家為保護(hù)投資者利益而創(chuàng)設(shè)的投資保護(hù)條款,經(jīng)歷了全面無(wú)條件到限制性適用再到相對(duì)限制性適用的演變。從創(chuàng)設(shè)之初單純強(qiáng)調(diào)對(duì)投資者進(jìn)行全方位的保護(hù),到在保護(hù)投資者與維護(hù)東道國(guó)權(quán)益之間尋求平衡,“保護(hù)傘條款”在投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制上為投資者提供了一種將違反東道國(guó)一投資者間投資合同的行為上升到違反條約的層面予以解決投資爭(zhēng)端的方法。國(guó)際仲裁庭在解決“保護(hù)傘條款”的適用問題時(shí)面臨的難題在于如何處理投資者依投資合同提起的合同之訴與依投資條約提出的條約之訴的關(guān)系問題以及如何確定仲裁管轄權(quán)。目前,國(guó)際仲裁實(shí)踐中對(duì)“保護(hù)傘條款”的適用仍未形成統(tǒng)一意見,個(gè)案分析情況表明仲裁實(shí)踐中表現(xiàn)出嚴(yán)重偏袒外國(guó)投資者的傾向,主要在于對(duì)投資條約中“保護(hù)傘條款”進(jìn)行不當(dāng)擴(kuò)大解釋,此舉對(duì)東道國(guó)主權(quán)構(gòu)成嚴(yán)重侵害。通過對(duì)投資條約中其他條款與“保護(hù)傘條款”之間的關(guān)系的深入分析,對(duì)“保護(hù)傘條款”的適用提出完善之建議,更好地發(fā)揮該條款在投資條約中的作用。同時(shí)結(jié)合我國(guó)締結(jié)投資條約的現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展趨勢(shì),對(duì)我國(guó)作為資本輸入國(guó)和資本輸出國(guó)時(shí)在投資條約中是否訂立“保護(hù)傘條款”以及如何訂立分別提出建議,以求最大限度維護(hù)我國(guó)利益。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of international investment liberalization, facilitation and integration, international direct investment has developed rapidly, and the number of international investment disputes between foreign investors and host countries has also shown an increasing trend. And the trend of investment disputes has changed from political disputes to management disputes. As an investment protection clause created by developed countries to protect the interests of investors, the "umbrella clause" has undergone an evolution from unconditional to restrictive application and then to relative restrictive application. From the beginning of its creation, it simply emphasized the all-around protection of investors, to seek a balance between protecting investors and safeguarding the rights and interests of the host country. The "umbrella clause" provides investors with a way to resolve the investment dispute by violating the investment contract between the host country and the investor to the level of violation of the treaty. The problems faced by the international arbitration tribunal in solving the application of the umbrella clause lie in how to deal with the relationship between the investor's litigation under the investment contract and the treaty suit under the investment treaty, and how to determine the arbitration jurisdiction. At present, the application of the umbrella clause in the practice of international arbitration has not yet formed a unified opinion. The case analysis shows that the arbitration practice shows a tendency to show a serious bias towards foreign investors. This is mainly due to the improper expansion of the umbrella clause in the investment treaty, which constitutes a serious infringement on the host country's sovereignty. Through the deep analysis of the relationship between the other clauses in investment treaties and the "umbrella clause", the author puts forward some suggestions for the application of the "umbrella clause", so as to give better play to the role of the clause in the investment treaty. At the same time, according to the current situation and development trend of investment treaties concluded in China, the paper puts forward some suggestions on whether China, as a capital importing country and a capital exporting country, makes "umbrella clauses" in investment treaties and how to make them. In order to maximize the protection of our interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 向玉蘭;;“BIT條款”和“協(xié)議條款”對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)的影響[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年01期

2 余勁松;詹曉寧;;國(guó)際投資協(xié)定的近期發(fā)展及對(duì)中國(guó)的影響[J];法學(xué)家;2006年03期

3 王楠;;雙邊投資協(xié)定中的傘形條款解釋——兼論ICSID近期相關(guān)案例[J];法學(xué)家;2008年06期

4 梁晶晶;;保護(hù)傘條款在國(guó)際投資中的適用——兼評(píng)CMS天然氣運(yùn)輸公司訴阿根廷案[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年20期

5 余瑩;晚近投資條約的自由化發(fā)展述評(píng)——兼評(píng)我國(guó)的投資條約實(shí)踐[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

6 劉筍;晚近雙邊投資條約發(fā)展值得注意的幾個(gè)特點(diǎn)——極力弱化東道國(guó)外資管轄權(quán)成為趨勢(shì)[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

7 徐崇利;;“保護(hù)傘條款”的適用范圍之爭(zhēng)與我國(guó)的對(duì)策[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

8 李貴英;;國(guó)際投資條約之傘狀條款研究:對(duì)兩岸未來(lái)處理投資議題之啟示[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2009年06期

9 徐泉;外資管轄權(quán)弱化的法律分析[J];西北師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

10 趙燕;;論傘式條款在雙邊投資協(xié)定中的作用[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2009年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 華怡冰;國(guó)際投資協(xié)定中的保護(hù)傘條款解釋問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 劉巍;雙邊投資協(xié)定中的保護(hù)傘條款研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2007年

3 王參;雙邊投資條約中的“保護(hù)傘條款”研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2245861