發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-11 14:59

【摘要】：食品行業(yè)作為滿足人們基本需求的基礎(chǔ)性行業(yè)，在國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)中處于最基礎(chǔ)的地位，隨著國(guó)民生活水平的不斷提高，人們對(duì)食品的品質(zhì)和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)要求顯得越來(lái)越高。三鹿奶粉事件之后，許多國(guó)內(nèi)消費(fèi)者的消費(fèi)取向轉(zhuǎn)向“國(guó)際品牌”的懷抱。進(jìn)口食品是否安全不僅決定了國(guó)際間的食品交易能否順利進(jìn)行，還將在一定程度上影響國(guó)家之間的政治利益，缺陷食品的進(jìn)口還將給消費(fèi)者帶來(lái)不可估量的損失。作為弱勢(shì)一方的中國(guó)消費(fèi)者，在發(fā)生糾紛發(fā)生之后很難同實(shí)力雄厚的跨國(guó)公司相抗衡，想通過(guò)平等地協(xié)商談判已屬不易，即便試圖通過(guò)提起民事訴訟來(lái)維護(hù)自己正當(dāng)?shù)臋?quán)益，維權(quán)之路卻顯得艱辛漫長(zhǎng)，最后有可能出現(xiàn)“贏了官司卻賠錢(qián)”的局面。這一現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn)，歸根結(jié)底是由于侵權(quán)行為發(fā)生在中國(guó)境內(nèi)，根據(jù)現(xiàn)有的沖突法規(guī)則，一般中國(guó)法律將得到適用，而中國(guó)關(guān)于消費(fèi)者保護(hù)的法律不完善，保護(hù)水平較低，導(dǎo)致實(shí)踐中忽視了涉外消費(fèi)侵權(quán)與一般民事侵權(quán)的區(qū)別，忽視了涉外消費(fèi)侵權(quán)案件的特殊性與復(fù)雜性。因此根據(jù)我國(guó)國(guó)情來(lái)完善我國(guó)涉外食品侵權(quán)法律制度顯得尤為重要，據(jù)此，本文除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)之外，分為三個(gè)部分： 第一章是問(wèn)題的提出。首先從法律的層面對(duì)涉外食品侵權(quán)責(zé)任的相關(guān)概念作出界定，然后對(duì)我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀作出詳細(xì)的論述，從涉外食品侵權(quán)法律制度的現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展和存在的問(wèn)題兩個(gè)方面； 第二章對(duì)美國(guó)及歐洲的涉外產(chǎn)品責(zé)任法律制度進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的比較研究。從美國(guó)《第一次沖突法重述》到《第二次沖突法重述》的蛻變分析，，再?gòu)臍W洲的傳統(tǒng)規(guī)則到現(xiàn)代規(guī)則的分析，再到《海牙公約》的法律適用規(guī)則概述，最后總結(jié)出國(guó)際立法趨勢(shì)； 第三章是關(guān)于完善我國(guó)涉外食品侵權(quán)法律制度的國(guó)際法思考。本章首先闡述了完善涉外食品侵權(quán)法律制度的理論基礎(chǔ)，其次對(duì)完善我國(guó)涉外食品侵權(quán)法律制度提出來(lái)具有建設(shè)性的幾點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:Food industry as the basic industry to meet the basic needs of people, in the national economy in the most basic position, with the continuous improvement of the national standard of living, the quality and standard of food is becoming more and more demanding. After Sanlu milk powder incident, many domestic consumer's consumption orientation turns to the "international brand" embrace. The safety of imported food not only determines whether the international food trade can be carried out smoothly, but also affects the political interests of countries to a certain extent. The import of defective food will also bring incalculable losses to consumers. As a weak party, Chinese consumers can hardly compete with powerful multinational corporations after disputes occur, and it is not easy to negotiate on an equal footing, even if they try to defend their legitimate rights and interests by filing civil proceedings. But the road to rights-safeguarding appears to be long and difficult, and may eventually appear "win the case but lose money" situation. In the final analysis, the occurrence of this phenomenon is due to the fact that the tort occurred in the territory of China. According to the existing rules of conflict of laws, general Chinese laws will be applied, while China's laws on consumer protection are imperfect and the level of protection is relatively low. In practice, the difference between foreign consumption tort and general civil tort is ignored, and the particularity and complexity of foreign consumption tort cases are ignored. Therefore, it is particularly important to perfect the foreign food tort legal system according to the national conditions of our country. According to this, this paper is divided into three parts except the introduction and conclusion: the first chapter is the question. First of all, it defines the concept of food tort liability from the legal level, and then makes a detailed discussion on the current situation of judicial practice in our country, from the current situation and development of the foreign food tort legal system and the existing problems. The second chapter makes a detailed comparative study on the legal system of foreign product liability in the United States and Europe. From the American restatement of the first conflict of laws to the restatement of the second conflict of laws, and from the analysis of the European traditional rules to the modern rules, to the summary of the applicable rules of the Hague Convention, Finally, the trend of international legislation is summarized; the third chapter is about the improvement of foreign food tort legal system in international law. This chapter firstly expounds the theoretical basis of perfecting the foreign food tort legal system, and then puts forward some constructive suggestions for perfecting the foreign food tort legal system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張?jiān)?;中美缺陷食品侵權(quán)之產(chǎn)品責(zé)任比較研究——以麥當(dāng)勞訴訟案為模型的研究[J];比較法研究;2006年05期

2 陳力;產(chǎn)品責(zé)任法律比較及法律適用[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年05期

3 曹建明,林燕平;對(duì)完善中國(guó)涉外產(chǎn)品責(zé)任法律的思考與建議[J];法學(xué);1999年07期

4 尹力;論涉外侵權(quán)行為的法律適用原則——兼評(píng)我國(guó)民法通則及國(guó)際私法示范法的有關(guān)規(guī)定[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年01期

5 裴普;;沖突法中法官自由裁量權(quán)的實(shí)證分析[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年05期

6 段衛(wèi)華;王強(qiáng);;涉外產(chǎn)品責(zé)任的法律沖突與法律適用[J];河北法學(xué);2006年09期

7 陳麗麗;淺析涉外侵權(quán)行為法律適用的發(fā)展與完善[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

8 劉曉紅,許旭;國(guó)際產(chǎn)品責(zé)任侵權(quán)的法律適用[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

9 張以標(biāo),易楚晨;論我國(guó)涉外產(chǎn)品責(zé)任法律適用原則的重構(gòu)[J];江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

10 金彭年;國(guó)際私法上侵權(quán)行為的法律適用[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張濤;食品安全法律規(guī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 劉雁冰;國(guó)際產(chǎn)品責(zé)任法律適用問(wèn)題研究與我國(guó)立法之完善[D];西北大學(xué);2005年

2 王立云;涉外產(chǎn)品責(zé)任法律適用問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2006年

3 宋大維;中外食品安全監(jiān)管的比較研究[D];中國(guó)人民大學(xué);2008年

4 路曉靜;食品安全侵權(quán)損害賠償法律問(wèn)題研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2237027