【摘要】：第二次世界大戰(zhàn)以后國(guó)際社會(huì)就大規(guī)模侵犯人權(quán)犯罪發(fā)展出幾種基本處理模式,但這些以西方人權(quán)觀與司法觀為主導(dǎo)的模式在處理盧旺達(dá)國(guó)內(nèi)種族屠殺犯罪的過(guò)程中卻顯得力不從心。有鑒于此,盧旺達(dá)政府試圖通過(guò)對(duì)本國(guó)傳統(tǒng)爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制即岡卡卡法庭的改良來(lái)處理其所面臨的棘手問(wèn)題。然而,建立在盧旺達(dá)特殊文化與歷史基礎(chǔ)上的新型岡卡卡法庭雖然在審理數(shù)目驚人的種族屠殺犯罪案件方面取得了一定成效,但同時(shí)在其適用過(guò)程當(dāng)中所暴露出的根本性缺陷也對(duì)國(guó)際刑法理論提出了新的挑戰(zhàn)。
[Abstract]:Following the second World War, the international community developed several basic modes of dealing with large-scale human rights violations, But these models, which are dominated by the western view of human rights and justice, are unable to deal with the crime of genocide in Rwanda. In view of this, the Rwandan government is trying to deal with the thorny problems it faces by improving its traditional dispute settlement mechanism, the Gunkaka Tribunal. However, the new Gonkaka Tribunal, based on the special culture and history of Rwanda, has achieved some success in the trial of an alarming number of crimes of genocide, But at the same time, the fundamental defects exposed in the course of its application also pose a new challenge to the theory of international criminal law.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.9
，

本文編號(hào)：2229572