【摘要】：英國大法官Michael Kerr曾經說過：“我對訴訟的看法已經改變，將來是屬于替代性糾紛解決方式（ADR）的。”的確，越來越多的國家開始重視ADR的構建，相關立法亦逐步得到完善。例如中國，2009年最高人民法院所出臺的《最高人民法院關于建立健全訴訟與非訴訟相銜接的矛盾糾紛解決機制的若干意見》就明確地表示在充分發(fā)揮審判權的規(guī)范，引導和監(jiān)督作用的前提下，促進如仲裁，調解等非訴訟糾紛解決方式的發(fā)展，為社會提供更多元化的糾紛解決方式。商事仲裁中的調解方式作為中國首創(chuàng)的ADR方式，正受到越來越多國家地區(qū)以及仲裁機構的接受與適用，因此中國更應當進一步完善商事仲裁中的調解的立法，修正現有問題，為世界提供更多先進的立法經驗。而本文正是以商事仲裁中的調解為主題，首先從學理方面探討其合法性與優(yōu)勢，其次對仲裁員與當事人在實際適用商事仲裁中調解的過程中可能會面對的問題作出分析，并提供解決方案；最后本文還將通過分析各國以及各仲裁機構對商事仲裁中調解的相關立法，提出中國現行法的不足，并嘗試給出自己的建議。 本文主要包括五章內容。第一章為“商事仲裁中的調解”，其中包括兩小節(jié)：第一節(jié)將會對仲裁調解的概念以及發(fā)展歷史作簡要的介紹；第二節(jié)為本章的主要內容，將會詳細介紹學術界對仲裁調解正面與負面的爭論。 本文第二章至第四章為仲裁員以及仲裁當事人在仲裁過程中適用仲裁調解時所必須注意以及明晰的三個問題。第二章為“仲裁調解的棄權問題”，，它是仲裁調解能夠得以適用的最重要的前提條件，因為當事人若想適用仲裁調解，首要條件便是要放棄對仲裁員兼任調解員的異議權（第一節(jié)）；其次，由于調解具有保密性，因此當事人也應當授權仲裁員在擔任調解員時不對其所獲得的保密信息向仲裁當事人披露，也就是第二節(jié)所說的對仲裁員的揭露義務的放棄。第三章為“仲裁調解中的公共政策問題”，該問題集中體現在三點上，同時也是本章中三小節(jié)的內容，分別是：第一節(jié)公共政策的概念，第二節(jié)仲裁調解中的偏袒問題，以及第三節(jié)中的仲裁調解與自然公正的問題。本文的第四章是有關仲裁調解中調解涉及第三人利益的問題，第一節(jié)將會舉列三種有可能涉及第三人利益的情況；第二節(jié)將會討論現有的救濟方式是否能夠給予第三人充分的保障。 第五章“完善仲裁調解的思考與對策”是本文的最末一章。第一節(jié)將會主要介紹各國以及仲裁機構有關仲裁調解的立法與規(guī)則，并找出能夠借鑒的先進經驗；第二節(jié)主要圍繞著如何完善我國仲裁調解的問題進行，探討我國現存的相關法律的缺陷并試圖給出有用的立法建議。
[Abstract]:Lord Chancellor Michael Kerr once said: "my view of litigation has changed, and in the future it will be (ADR), an alternative dispute resolution." Indeed, more and more countries begin to attach importance to the construction of ADR, and the relevant legislation has been gradually improved. For example, in China, in 2009, the Supreme people's Court's opinions on establishing and perfecting a mechanism for resolving contradictions and disputes linking litigation and non-litigation clearly indicated that the Supreme people's Court was giving full play to the norms of judicial power. Under the premise of guidance and supervision, we should promote the development of non-litigation dispute resolution methods such as arbitration and mediation, and provide more diversified dispute resolution methods for the society. As the first ADR method in China, mediation in commercial arbitration is accepted and applied by more and more countries and arbitration institutions. Therefore, China should further perfect the mediation legislation in commercial arbitration and correct the existing problems. To provide the world with more advanced legislative experience. In this paper, the mediation in commercial arbitration as the theme, first from the theoretical aspects of its legitimacy and advantages, and secondly to the arbitrators and parties in the actual application of commercial arbitration mediation may face the problems. Finally, by analyzing the relevant legislation of mediation in commercial arbitration in various countries and arbitration institutions, this paper puts forward the deficiencies of China's current law and tries to give its own suggestions. This paper mainly includes five chapters. Chapter one is "Conciliation in Commercial Arbitration", which consists of two sections: the first section will give a brief introduction to the concept and history of arbitration conciliation, and the second section will be the main content of this chapter. This paper will introduce the positive and negative arguments of arbitration mediation in academic circles in detail. The second to fourth chapters are the three problems that should be paid attention to and clear when arbitrators and arbitration parties apply arbitration conciliation in the process of arbitration. The second chapter is entitled "waiver of arbitration conciliation", which is the most important precondition for arbitration conciliation to be applicable, because if the parties want to apply arbitration conciliation, The first condition is to waive the right to challenge the arbitrators acting concurrently as conciliators (sect. I); secondly, because of the confidentiality of conciliation, Therefore, the parties should also authorize arbitrators to act as conciliators without disclosing the confidential information they have obtained to the parties to the arbitration, that is, the waiver of the disclosure obligation of the arbitrators referred to in section II. The third chapter is "the public policy question in the arbitration mediation", which is embodied in three aspects, and it is also the content of the three subsections in this chapter, namely, the concept of public policy in the first section, and the favouritism in the arbitration mediation in the second section. And the third section of arbitration mediation and natural justice. The fourth chapter is about the third party's interests in the mediation of arbitration, the first section will list three possible cases involving the interests of the third party; Section II will discuss whether existing remedies can provide adequate protection to third parties. The fifth chapter is the last chapter of this paper. The first section will mainly introduce the legislation and rules of arbitration mediation in various countries and arbitration institutions, and find out the advanced experience that can be used for reference. The second section will focus on how to perfect the arbitration mediation in our country. This paper probes into the defects of the existing relevant laws in China and tries to give some useful legislative suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：深圳大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D997.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 曹志勛;;我國仲裁調解案外人救濟途徑評述[J];北京仲裁;2011年01期

2 王小莉;;仲裁調解書有關法律問題辨析[J];仲裁研究;2008年04期

本文編號：2220327