發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-25 07:43

【摘要】：加入世界貿(mào)易組織,不僅給中國(guó)帶來了許多機(jī)遇同時(shí)也帶來了更多挑戰(zhàn)。在全球經(jīng)濟(jì)都呈現(xiàn)發(fā)展放緩甚至衰退的今天,中國(guó)的對(duì)外貿(mào)易總量及經(jīng)濟(jì)總量卻保持著高速穩(wěn)定的發(fā)展。歐盟作為世界上最大的經(jīng)濟(jì)體,是目前中國(guó)最大的貿(mào)易合作伙伴。與此同時(shí),歐盟是世界上對(duì)中國(guó)發(fā)起反傾銷調(diào)查最多的地區(qū)。大量的反傾銷調(diào)查不僅損害了中國(guó)出口企業(yè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益,也對(duì)整個(gè)中國(guó)出口產(chǎn)業(yè)造成了嚴(yán)重影響。由于歐盟經(jīng)濟(jì)的持續(xù)衰退,歐盟的貿(mào)易保護(hù)傾向越來越嚴(yán)重,這意味著針對(duì)中國(guó)發(fā)起的反傾銷調(diào)查將會(huì)越來越多。中國(guó)目前還處在應(yīng)對(duì)反傾銷調(diào)查的初期階段,中國(guó)政府與企業(yè)都缺乏相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn)和相關(guān)法律人才。因此,深入了解歐盟的反傾銷法規(guī)并找準(zhǔn)應(yīng)對(duì)的方法是首要任務(wù)。 本文通過對(duì)大量的反傾銷案例進(jìn)行分析,深入發(fā)掘了歐盟在認(rèn)定中國(guó)企業(yè)存在傾銷時(shí)的重要依據(jù)與原則。在此基礎(chǔ)上,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)中國(guó)的“非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位”是中國(guó)與歐盟在面對(duì)反傾銷調(diào)查時(shí)最大的分歧點(diǎn)。本文首先通過運(yùn)用經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的數(shù)據(jù)分析方法如規(guī)范分析法與實(shí)證分析法,結(jié)合橫向分析與縱向分析對(duì)近幾年中歐之間的貿(mào)易數(shù)據(jù)及反傾銷調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分類與比較,發(fā)現(xiàn)歐盟針對(duì)中國(guó)發(fā)起的反傾銷調(diào)查存在快速增長(zhǎng)、肯定性終裁率高及涉案產(chǎn)品范圍廣、特定產(chǎn)品數(shù)量大的特點(diǎn)。同時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)中國(guó)企業(yè)難以在傾銷認(rèn)定時(shí)獲得歐盟認(rèn)可的“市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位”。面對(duì)這樣的特點(diǎn),筆者通過具體案例對(duì)歐盟的《反傾銷條例》中關(guān)于“市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位”認(rèn)定的五條標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了深入的剖析。其次,筆者對(duì)中國(guó)的市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位進(jìn)行了全方位的肯定性論證。最后,針對(duì)“非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位”這一爭(zhēng)議點(diǎn)筆者分別給出了針對(duì)中國(guó)政府及企業(yè)的對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) has not only brought China many opportunities, but also brought more challenges. Today, when the global economy is slowing down or even declining, China's foreign trade volume and total economic volume maintain a rapid and stable development. As the world's largest economy, the EU is currently China's largest trading partner. At the same time, the European Union is the world's largest anti-dumping investigation against China. A large number of anti-dumping investigations not only hurt the economic interests of China's export enterprises, but also have a serious impact on the entire Chinese export industry. As the European Union's economy continues to decline, the EU's tendency to protect trade is growing, which means more anti-dumping investigations will be launched against China. China is still in the early stage of dealing with anti-dumping investigations, and the Chinese government and enterprises lack relevant experience and relevant legal personnel. Therefore, the most important task is to understand EU anti-dumping regulations and to find out how to deal with them. Based on the analysis of a large number of anti-dumping cases, this paper explores the important basis and principles of the EU in determining the existence of dumping in Chinese enterprises. On this basis, the author finds that China's "non-market economy status" is the biggest divergence point between China and EU in the face of anti-dumping investigation. Firstly, this paper classifies and compares the trade data and anti-dumping investigation data between China and Europe in recent years by using economic data analysis methods such as normative analysis and empirical analysis, combining horizontal analysis and longitudinal analysis. It is found that the anti-dumping investigation initiated by the European Union against China has the characteristics of rapid growth, high positive final arbitration rate, wide range of products involved, and large quantity of specific products. At the same time, it is difficult for Chinese enterprises to obtain the "market economy status" recognized by the European Union when the dumping is confirmed. In the face of such characteristics, the author makes a thorough analysis of the five standards concerning the recognition of "market economy status" in the EU's Anti-dumping regulations through specific cases. Second, the author of the market economy status of China has all-round positive argument. Finally, aiming at the dispute of "non-market economy status", the author puts forward the countermeasures for Chinese government and enterprises respectively.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;F752.02

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張文科,劉曉潔;非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家地位與對(duì)華反傾銷[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2005年02期

2 王勝偉;;反傾銷非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家問題研究[J];江蘇技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

3 陳明聰;我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)因非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位問題被反傾銷的對(duì)策[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2003年04期

4 俞姣紅;;我國(guó)出口貿(mào)易風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的會(huì)計(jì)應(yīng)對(duì)措施[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2007年07期

5 高鵬程;;論兩反調(diào)查程序共存時(shí)傾銷幅度確定過程中的價(jià)格調(diào)整——WTO規(guī)則和美國(guó)的實(shí)踐[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2008年04期

6 高維新;;歐盟對(duì)華反傾銷的經(jīng)濟(jì)影響及對(duì)策分析[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2010年05期

7 張芳 ,鄒俊;中國(guó)“非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位”問題研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年05期

8 吳總建;張小南;;我國(guó)出口產(chǎn)品遭受國(guó)外歧視性反傾銷的原因及應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];理論與改革;2006年06期

9 王美瑩;李雪;;試論中國(guó)的“非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位”與對(duì)華反傾銷[J];內(nèi)蒙古民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

10 李金玲;李曉燕;;“非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位”相關(guān)問題的理論分析[J];前沿;2006年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 方曙光;[N];財(cái)經(jīng)時(shí)報(bào);2006年

2 外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)教授、中國(guó)WTO研究會(huì)副會(huì)長(zhǎng) 薛榮久;[N];中國(guó)貿(mào)易報(bào);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：2202223