【摘要】：隨著全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化時代的到來,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的力度在國際貿(mào)易中得到了加強(qiáng)。美國的337調(diào)查便是保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的有力武器,其調(diào)查的范圍是向美國的進(jìn)口貿(mào)易中侵害知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的產(chǎn)品和其他的不公平競爭行為。我國自從加入WTO以后,國際貿(mào)易得到了迅速的發(fā)展。但是由于我國企業(yè)缺乏有競爭力的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)核心產(chǎn)品,因此頻頻遭遇美國的337調(diào)查,而今我國已成為337調(diào)查的主要對象國。中國企業(yè)遭遇美國337調(diào)查的案件,如果勝訴,那么便是起訴方的專利有問題或者是訴訟工作不嚴(yán)謹(jǐn),或者中國企業(yè)的專利是自主研發(fā)的;如果和解,那么便是雙方不同程度的讓步;至于敗訴,那是由于侵犯了起訴方的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)。就我國企業(yè)頻繁遭遇337調(diào)查的原因來說,其根本原因是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)欠發(fā)達(dá),衍生原因是不尊重他人知識產(chǎn)權(quán)和消極應(yīng)訴。而要突破美國的337調(diào)查,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)新是根本途徑,其連帶對策是合法經(jīng)營、規(guī)劃和實施知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略以及積極應(yīng)訴。我國企業(yè)只有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)達(dá),才能有效地化解337調(diào)查的困境。我國只有成為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)達(dá)國家,才能對國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù),對國際貿(mào)易,作出一個大國應(yīng)有的貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:With the advent of the era of global economic integration, the protection of intellectual property rights has been strengthened in international trade. The 337 survey in the United States is a powerful weapon for the protection of intellectual property rights. Its scope of investigation is products infringing intellectual property rights and other unfair competition in import trade from the United States. International trade has developed rapidly. However, due to the lack of competitive intellectual property core products, Chinese enterprises frequently encounter 337 investigations in the United States, and now China has become the main target country of 337 investigations. Lawsuit work is not rigorous, or the patents of Chinese enterprises are independently developed; if reconciliation is made, there will be different degrees of concession between the two sides; as for the defeat, it is because of infringement of the intellectual property rights of the prosecution. In order to break through the 337 investigation in the United States, intellectual property innovation is the fundamental way. Its joint and several countermeasures are lawful operation, planning and implementing intellectual property strategy, and actively responding to the lawsuit. Only in this way can we make contributions to international intellectual property protection and international trade.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D997.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 胡承偉;;關(guān)鍵設(shè)施理論與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)拒絕許可的反壟斷規(guī)制[J];濱州學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年02期

2 ;時訊點擊[J];法律與生活;2014年11期

3 ;江西省人民政府關(guān)于裴忠彪等同志正式任職的通知[J];江西省人民政府公報;2014年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 于光榮;中國企業(yè)應(yīng)對美國337調(diào)查的案例和對策研究[D];湖南工業(yè)大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：2191929