【摘要】：保護(hù)責(zé)任是二十一世紀(jì)初才出現(xiàn)的新鮮概念和理論,目的為解決國(guó)家主權(quán)與國(guó)際干預(yù)之間的潛在沖突提供一個(gè)的新出路。它涉及國(guó)際法原則、人道主義干涉、聯(lián)合國(guó)集體安全體制等重大問(wèn)題而且在短時(shí)間內(nèi)就引起了國(guó)際社會(huì)的重視,也成為國(guó)際法學(xué)亟需研究的前沿課題。 本文由引言、正文三章及結(jié)論組成。 引言部分簡(jiǎn)要介紹了選題的目的和意義、研究方法。 第一章全面的分析和梳理了保護(hù)責(zé)任產(chǎn)生的背景、原因、思想基礎(chǔ)以及演變的過(guò)程。本章首先分析了人道主義干涉所遭遇的理論與現(xiàn)實(shí)困境,并指出這是保護(hù)責(zé)任產(chǎn)生的關(guān)鍵背景。接著第二部分研究了保護(hù)責(zé)任的產(chǎn)生根源是人權(quán)的國(guó)際保護(hù)日益發(fā)展,人類(lèi)安全觀和“作為責(zé)任的主權(quán)”思想構(gòu)成保護(hù)責(zé)任的思想基礎(chǔ)。最后一節(jié)分別介紹和探討了保護(hù)責(zé)任在主要國(guó)際文件中的表述和演變。 第二章主要是對(duì)保護(hù)責(zé)任理論的主要內(nèi)容進(jìn)行法律分析。第一節(jié)著重探析保護(hù)責(zé)任所主張的內(nèi)容在現(xiàn)有國(guó)際法規(guī)范中的法律依據(jù)和基礎(chǔ),通過(guò)比較分析指出保護(hù)責(zé)任所應(yīng)適用的范圍。第二節(jié)詳細(xì)地分析了《保護(hù)的責(zé)任》報(bào)告所提出預(yù)防的責(zé)任、反應(yīng)的責(zé)任、重建的責(zé)任核心內(nèi)容,重點(diǎn)研究了在極端情況下軍事干預(yù)的六條標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第三章是本文的重點(diǎn),結(jié)合世界首腦會(huì)議之后保護(hù)責(zé)任在聯(lián)合國(guó)大會(huì)、安理會(huì)新近發(fā)展,研究和分析了目前保護(hù)責(zé)任對(duì)國(guó)際主權(quán)原則、不干涉內(nèi)政原則、人道主義干涉的影響,并從法理的角度分析了當(dāng)前保護(hù)責(zé)任在國(guó)際法上的地位問(wèn)題。 結(jié)論部分作者總結(jié)了全文的主要觀點(diǎn)。作者認(rèn)為,保護(hù)責(zé)任的諸多內(nèi)容本身根植于已有的國(guó)際法之中,它所主張的有關(guān)國(guó)際干預(yù)的規(guī)范對(duì)國(guó)際法產(chǎn)生了一些影響而非實(shí)質(zhì)性的改變。目前,保護(hù)責(zé)任還不是一個(gè)明確的法律概念和法律原則,也沒(méi)有形成稱(chēng)之為保護(hù)責(zé)任的國(guó)際法規(guī)范。
[Abstract]:The responsibility to protect (R2P) is a new concept and theory that emerged in the early 21 century. It aims to provide a new way to solve the potential conflict between national sovereignty and international intervention. It involves the principles of international law, humanitarian intervention, the United Nations collective security system and other important issues, and in a short period of time has attracted the attention of the international community, and has become an international law needs to be the forefront of research topics. This paper consists of introduction, three chapters and conclusions. The introduction briefly introduces the purpose and significance of the topic, research methods. The first chapter comprehensively analyzes and combs the background, reasons, ideological basis and evolution process of R2P. This chapter first analyzes the theoretical and practical difficulties encountered by humanitarian intervention, and points out that this is the key background of R2P. Then the second part studies the origin of the responsibility to protect is the development of the international protection of human rights, the concept of human security and the idea of "sovereignty as responsibility" constitute the ideological basis of the responsibility to protect. The last section introduces and discusses the expression and evolution of R2P in the main international documents. The second chapter mainly analyzes the main content of R2P theory. The first section focuses on the legal basis and foundation of the content advocated by the responsibility to protect in the existing norms of international law, and points out the scope of application of the responsibility to protect through comparative analysis. The second section analyzes in detail the responsibility of prevention, the responsibility to react, and the core content of the responsibility for reconstruction, and focuses on the six criteria for military intervention in extreme cases. The third chapter is the focus of this paper, combined with the recent development of the responsibility to protect in the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council after the World Summit, the impact of the current responsibility to protect on the principles of international sovereignty, non-interference in internal affairs and humanitarian intervention is studied and analyzed. It also analyzes the status of R2P in international law from the angle of legal theory. In conclusion, the author summarizes the main points of the paper. The author holds that many elements of the responsibility to protect are rooted in existing international law and that the norms of international intervention which it advocates have had some influence on international law rather than substantial changes. At present, R2P is not a clear legal concept and principle, nor has it formed a norm of international law called R2P.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D990

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 楊澤偉;人道主義干涉在國(guó)際法中的地位[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張中新;冷戰(zhàn)后國(guó)際人道主義干預(yù)問(wèn)題探析[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2159515