發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-27 10:14

  本文選題：投資自由化 + 國(guó)家主權(quán)��； 參考：《北京化工大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著2009年8月15日中國(guó)-東盟《投資協(xié)議》的簽訂，中國(guó)和東盟成功的完成了中國(guó)-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)協(xié)議的主要談判，也直接促成了自由貿(mào)易區(qū)在2010年的全面建成。隨著中國(guó)—東盟自貿(mào)區(qū)的發(fā)展，雙方投資合作逐步加快，在基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)、制造業(yè)、農(nóng)業(yè)、通訊、電力、勞務(wù)合作、工程承包等諸多領(lǐng)域的投資合作進(jìn)展順利。東盟已經(jīng)成為中國(guó)企業(yè)進(jìn)行外國(guó)投資的首選地區(qū)之一，同時(shí)中國(guó)也成為東盟各國(guó)重要的投資市場(chǎng)。為了高效地解決在投資活動(dòng)中發(fā)生的投資者與東道國(guó)之間的投資爭(zhēng)議，2009年，各國(guó)簽署了《人民共和國(guó)政府與東南亞國(guó)家聯(lián)盟成員國(guó)全面經(jīng)濟(jì)合作框架協(xié)議投資協(xié)議》（簡(jiǎn)稱《投資協(xié)議》）。在《投資協(xié)議》第14條對(duì)投資者與東道國(guó)之間的投資爭(zhēng)議解決作出了規(guī)定，但是這些規(guī)定過于簡(jiǎn)略，無法應(yīng)對(duì)不斷發(fā)展的國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端的復(fù)雜狀況。本文正是以此為切入點(diǎn)，試圖構(gòu)建較為合理且實(shí)用的爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制。 本文主要分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分主要介紹投資者與東道國(guó)投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的建立。東盟各國(guó)與中國(guó)之間的投資貿(mào)易中私人投資占了很大的比例，投資爭(zhēng)端的良好解決，對(duì)于促進(jìn)投資活動(dòng)的順利進(jìn)行和良好的投資環(huán)境的形成有著重要意義。 第二部分對(duì)《投資協(xié)議》第14條作出了分析，提出了當(dāng)下的爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制中存在的問題。這些問題的產(chǎn)生一方面是由于各國(guó)之間的分歧較大，導(dǎo)致達(dá)成的協(xié)議有些部分過于保守；另一方面則是由于受到西方投資自由化思想的影響，協(xié)議的有些部分對(duì)各國(guó)主權(quán)有所損害。 第三部分概述了投資爭(zhēng)議解決方式的發(fā)展歷史。從開始的不太重視到保護(hù)措施的不斷加強(qiáng)，直到使用多邊方式保護(hù)投資，形成了包括華盛頓公約、多邊投資擔(dān)保機(jī)構(gòu)公約、北美自由協(xié)定和OECD多邊投資協(xié)定在內(nèi)的多種投資保護(hù)措施。但是可以看出，這些爭(zhēng)端解決方式主要產(chǎn)生于西方發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家之間。經(jīng)過分析可以得出初步結(jié)論：這些爭(zhēng)端解決方式的主流指導(dǎo)思想依然是投資的自由化。 第四部分對(duì)存在的問題的復(fù)雜性做了進(jìn)一步的分析，并提出了解決途徑，主要分為兩個(gè)方面：擴(kuò)大一些程序性部分的自由化和在一些實(shí)體權(quán)利方面維護(hù)各國(guó)主權(quán)。解決爭(zhēng)議的主要途徑就在于建立自由貿(mào)易區(qū)本身內(nèi)部專門的爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)以及一系列配套措施，，既能高效解決爭(zhēng)端，又不至于侵害到各國(guó)的主權(quán)。
[Abstract]:With the signing of the China-ASEAN Investment Agreement on August 15, 2009, China and ASEAN successfully completed the main negotiations of the China-ASEAN Free Trade area Agreement, which directly contributed to the completion of the Free Trade area in 2010. With the development of the China-ASEAN Free Trade area, the investment cooperation between the two sides has been speeded up, and the investment cooperation in infrastructure construction, manufacturing, agriculture, communications, electricity, labor cooperation, project contracting and many other fields is progressing smoothly. ASEAN has become one of the preferred regions for Chinese enterprises to make foreign investment, and China has also become an important investment market for ASEAN countries. In order to efficiently resolve investment disputes between investors and host countries in investment activities, in 2009, All countries have signed the Investment Agreement between the Government of the people's Republic of China and the ASEAN member countries. Article 14 of the Investment Agreement provides for the settlement of investment disputes between investors and the host country, but these provisions are too simple to cope with the complex situation of developing international investment disputes. This paper tries to construct a reasonable and practical dispute settlement mechanism. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part mainly introduces the establishment of investor-host country investment dispute settlement mechanism. Private investment accounts for a large proportion of the investment trade between ASEAN countries and China. A good settlement of investment disputes is of great significance to promote the smooth progress of investment activities and the formation of a good investment environment. The second part analyzes Article 14 of the Investment Agreement and points out the existing problems in the present dispute settlement mechanism. These problems arise, on the one hand, because of the great differences among countries, which lead to some parts of the agreement being too conservative, and on the other hand, because of the influence of Western ideas on investment liberalization. Some parts of the agreement undermine the sovereignty of nations. The third part summarizes the history of investment dispute settlement. From the beginning less attention to the strengthening of protection measures, until the use of multilateral approaches to protect investment, including the Washington Convention, the multilateral Investment guarantee Agency Convention, North American Free Agreement and OECD multilateral Investment Agreement, including a variety of investment protection measures. However, it can be seen that these dispute settlement methods mainly come from the western developed countries. After analysis, we can draw a preliminary conclusion that the main guiding ideology of these dispute settlement methods is still investment liberalization. The fourth part makes a further analysis of the complexity of the existing problems, and puts forward solutions, mainly divided into two aspects: expanding the liberalization of some procedural parts and safeguarding the sovereignty of States in some substantive rights. The main way to resolve disputes lies in the establishment of a special dispute settlement body within the Free Trade area and a series of supporting measures, which can solve disputes efficiently without infringing upon the sovereignty of each country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京化工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 湛茜;;論ICSID仲裁中當(dāng)事方的“同意”[J];北京仲裁;2010年01期

2 王彥志;;國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端解決的法律化:成就與挑戰(zhàn)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2011年03期

3 傅星國(guó);;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制中的報(bào)復(fù)問題[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2009年05期

4 陸以全;;中國(guó)——東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制評(píng)析——以締約方與投資者間爭(zhēng)端解決為視角[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2011年03期

5 杜萱;;試析用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)規(guī)則在國(guó)際投資法中的適用[J];青海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

6 單文華;張生;;從“南北矛盾”到“公私?jīng)_突”:卡爾沃主義的復(fù)蘇與國(guó)際投資法的新視野[J];西安交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

7 王遷;卡爾沃主義論[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年01期

8 肖小文;;CAFTA爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的法律探討[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2011年03期

9 蔡霜;;WTO與中國(guó)—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的比較[J];玉林師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué));2007年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 郭杰;論國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)議解決中東道國(guó)當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年

2 李衛(wèi)雁;WTO框架下的貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制對(duì)我國(guó)的影響及其對(duì)策研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2007年

3 劉長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn);國(guó)際投資的主要待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及其相互關(guān)系問題研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2007年

4 鄧志波;相互依存的國(guó)際政治經(jīng)濟(jì)體系下TRIMs協(xié)議前景探析[D];煙臺(tái)大學(xué);2008年

5 徐慧;論國(guó)際商事非內(nèi)國(guó)仲裁[D];河北大學(xué);2007年

6 莊偉;發(fā)展中國(guó)家參與WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

7 劉大鵬;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制與區(qū)域貿(mào)易組織爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制管轄權(quán)沖突問題研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2073583