本文選題：信用證獨(dú)立性原則 + 信用證欺詐　； 參考：《新疆大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：自我國(guó)加入WTO之后，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展迅速，外貿(mào)進(jìn)出口額也有了很大的增長(zhǎng)。在經(jīng)濟(jì)迅速發(fā)展的同時(shí)，國(guó)際結(jié)算業(yè)務(wù)也發(fā)展迅猛，，而作為現(xiàn)代國(guó)際結(jié)算工具的信用證的運(yùn)用更加廣泛。據(jù)相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)，我國(guó)80%的國(guó)際結(jié)算業(yè)務(wù)是通過信用證來完成的。由于信用證單據(jù)交易和其獨(dú)立于基礎(chǔ)交易的特點(diǎn)，使得信用證欺詐越來越頻繁的出現(xiàn)在國(guó)際結(jié)算過程中。更由于我國(guó)信用證結(jié)算業(yè)務(wù)起步較晚，銀行與企業(yè)對(duì)此種結(jié)算工具并不熟練，經(jīng)常面臨被欺詐的危險(xiǎn)。早期的司法實(shí)踐，出于對(duì)本國(guó)企業(yè)與銀行的保護(hù)，只要企業(yè)或銀行提出可能存在信用證欺詐就輕易凍結(jié)信用證項(xiàng)下款項(xiàng)，使得國(guó)內(nèi)銀行在國(guó)外的分行常常被起訴，并承擔(dān)敗訴的責(zé)任。本文從我國(guó)審理信用證欺詐的司法實(shí)踐出發(fā)，通過與英美法系和大陸法系一些國(guó)家在信用證欺詐立法方面以及司法實(shí)踐方面的比較，發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)在信用證欺詐立法上的不足，并提出解決意見，以求能對(duì)我國(guó)信用證欺詐的立法提供一些有價(jià)值的參考資料。
[Abstract]:Since China's entry into WTO, the economy has developed rapidly, and the import and export volume of foreign trade has also greatly increased. With the rapid development of economy, the international settlement business also develops rapidly, and the letter of credit, as a modern international settlement tool, is more widely used. According to the relevant statistics, 80% of the international settlement business is completed by letter of credit. Because of the characteristics of documentary transactions and their independence from basic transactions, letter of credit fraud appears more and more frequently in the process of international settlement. Because of the late start of L / C settlement in our country, banks and enterprises are not proficient in this kind of settlement instruments and are often faced with the risk of fraud. In early judicial practice, out of the protection of domestic enterprises and banks, as long as the enterprises or banks suggested that there might be letter of credit fraud, it was easy to freeze the funds under the letters of credit, so that branches of domestic banks abroad were often prosecuted. And bear the responsibility for losing the case. Starting from the judicial practice of handling letter of credit fraud in our country and comparing it with the legislation and judicial practice of letter of credit fraud in some countries of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, this paper finds out the deficiency in the legislation of letter of credit fraud in our country. In order to provide some valuable reference for the legislation of letter of credit fraud in China, the author puts forward some suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 江錦蓮,杜明;重構(gòu)我國(guó)信用證欺詐例外制度的若干問題研究——兼評(píng)最高人民法院《關(guān)于信用證糾紛案件若干問題的規(guī)定(討論稿)》[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年04期

2 王鵬;;關(guān)于信用證項(xiàng)下款項(xiàng)的中止支付問題[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)財(cái)會(huì);2009年12期

3 陳競(jìng);信用證欺詐情況下法院發(fā)布止付令的合法性問題研究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);1999年04期

4 徐s

本文編號(hào)：2070378