本文選題：人民幣匯率 + 匯率操縱��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：2001年以來,人民幣匯率問題成為國(guó)際社會(huì)上不斷爭(zhēng)議的話題,美國(guó)更是不斷對(duì)人民幣施壓,美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)不斷提出關(guān)于人民幣匯率的法案,指責(zé)人民幣匯率存在操縱或嚴(yán)重偏差,構(gòu)成了出口補(bǔ)貼和傾銷,違背了IMF和WTO相關(guān)規(guī)則。在國(guó)內(nèi)美國(guó)試圖通過立法的形式逼迫人民幣升值,在國(guó)際上,美國(guó)則將匯率爭(zhēng)端提交給IMF或WTO解決。所以在這種情況下,對(duì)匯率問題進(jìn)行法律層面的分析是非常重要的。 本文對(duì)美國(guó)的指控和行動(dòng)進(jìn)行了法律層面的評(píng)析,找出了美國(guó)將人民幣問題訴至WTO的法律依據(jù),從GATT第15條、IMF與WTO的關(guān)系以及WTO一般管轄權(quán)等方面分析得出WTO在匯率問題具有一定的管轄權(quán)。經(jīng)過對(duì)《反補(bǔ)貼協(xié)定》和《反傾銷協(xié)定》的分析,我們認(rèn)為人民幣匯率并不構(gòu)成美國(guó)所指控的出口補(bǔ)貼和傾銷,通過進(jìn)一步分析也反駁了美國(guó)對(duì)來自中國(guó)所有的產(chǎn)品征收反傾銷稅的做法。 美國(guó)對(duì)人民幣匯率所采取的一系列舉動(dòng)的真實(shí)目的就是通過逼迫人民幣升值為其國(guó)內(nèi)的制造業(yè)不景氣、失業(yè)等經(jīng)濟(jì)問題尋找替罪羊,壓制中國(guó)的崛起。雖然2014年以來人民幣匯率出現(xiàn)了幾次一定幅度的下跌,但我們不能放松警惕,人民幣匯率依然面臨著各種挑戰(zhàn),所以在認(rèn)清美國(guó)的真正意圖之后,就要主動(dòng)反擊,采取相應(yīng)的措施來維護(hù)我們的合法權(quán)益。這也是本文的意圖所在,為人民幣匯率問題提供法律上的抗辯依據(jù),為我國(guó)匯率制度的改革提出建議。
[Abstract]:Since 2001, the issue of RMB exchange rate has become a subject of constant controversy in the international community, and the United States has been exerting constant pressure on the RMB. The US Congress has repeatedly proposed a bill on the RMB exchange rate, accusing the RMB exchange rate of being manipulated or seriously deviated. It constitutes export subsidies and dumping, in violation of IMF and WTO rules. At home the United States tries to force the yuan to appreciate by way of legislation, while internationally, the United States refers the exchange rate dispute to the IMF or the WTO for settlement. So in this case, it is very important to analyze the legal level of exchange rate. This paper analyzes the charges and actions of the United States, and finds out the legal basis for the United States to bring the issue of RMB to the WTO. From the analysis of the relationship between IMF and WTO and the general jurisdiction of WTO, it is concluded that WTO has certain jurisdiction over exchange rate. Through the analysis of the "countervailing Agreement" and the "Anti-dumping Agreement", we believe that the RMB exchange rate does not constitute the export subsidies and dumping alleged by the United States. Further analysis also refutes US anti-dumping duties on all products from China. The real purpose of a series of moves by the United States to revalue the yuan is to find scapegoats for economic problems such as sluggish manufacturing and unemployment in the country and to suppress China's rise by forcing the yuan to appreciate. Although there have been several falls in the RMB exchange rate since 2014, we cannot relax our vigilance. The RMB exchange rate still faces various challenges. So, after recognizing the real intentions of the United States, we should take the initiative to counter back. Take appropriate measures to protect our legitimate rights and interests. This is also the intention of this paper, to provide the legal defense for the RMB exchange rate, and to put forward some suggestions for the reform of the exchange rate system in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D996.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳念魯,陳全庚,鄂志寰;論人民幣匯率機(jī)制改革[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2005年01期

2 趙杰宏;;試論國(guó)際貨幣基金組織(IMF)與世界貿(mào)易組織(WTO)的合作關(guān)系[J];東南亞縱橫;2008年07期

3 蘇旭靜;翁迎曉;;美國(guó)反傾銷規(guī)則與人民幣匯率問題的法律思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年18期

4 盧科寧;師永義;;對(duì)美國(guó)試圖運(yùn)用反傾銷方法解決人民幣匯率的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年22期

5 管榮;;論WTO對(duì)人民幣匯率爭(zhēng)端的管轄權(quán)[J];法治研究;2009年02期

6 韓龍;;IMF與WTO在人民幣匯率問題上的管轄關(guān)系——基于GATT和IMF協(xié)定的考察[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2007年01期

7 黃韜;陳儒丹;;WTO法律規(guī)則視野之中的人民幣匯率爭(zhēng)議[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2007年09期

8 賀小勇;;匯率主權(quán)攻守戰(zhàn):中美匯率爭(zhēng)端的法律分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2010年04期

9 吳嵐;;GATT1994第15條研究——兼論人民幣匯率困境之出路[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)研究;2012年03期

10 蔡周蒲;;人民幣匯率補(bǔ)貼論之再審視[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2013年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2036608