本文選題：已撤銷 + 域外效力��； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前,各國(guó)在已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決是否具有域外效力問(wèn)題上并未達(dá)成一致,但國(guó)際上總的趨勢(shì)是,傳統(tǒng)理論堅(jiān)持者仍然認(rèn)為已撤銷的國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決不具有域外效力,除非國(guó)際條約有相反規(guī)定;而多數(shù)的學(xué)者卻認(rèn)為在一定前提或條件下,裁決被撤銷并不必然導(dǎo)致該裁決不具有域外效力。裁決被撤銷有不同的理由,即使在賦予已撤銷仲裁裁決域外效力的國(guó)家也是如此,對(duì)于以國(guó)際法的規(guī)定為依據(jù)進(jìn)行的撤銷,爭(zhēng)議不大,但是對(duì)于以國(guó)內(nèi)法的規(guī)定為依據(jù)進(jìn)行的撤銷,卻爭(zhēng)議頗大。裁決作出地法院撤銷在其境內(nèi)作出的裁決,有國(guó)內(nèi)法上的依據(jù);裁決執(zhí)行地法院認(rèn)定已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決是否具有域外效力,也有國(guó)內(nèi)法上的依據(jù)。國(guó)內(nèi)法是各主權(quán)國(guó)家在各自的主權(quán)國(guó)家管轄范圍內(nèi)制定的法律,其依據(jù)是國(guó)家主權(quán)原則和屬地管轄權(quán)原則。但是各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法的規(guī)定千差萬(wàn)別,產(chǎn)生爭(zhēng)議是不可避免的。 已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的域外效力問(wèn)題在仲裁界引起了巨大的反響。本文探討的主要問(wèn)題是:如果國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決被裁決地國(guó)法院撤銷,執(zhí)行地國(guó)法院是否還可以執(zhí)行該被撤銷了的裁決,依據(jù)什么樣的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行或者拒絕承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行該被撤銷了的裁決,我國(guó)在已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的域外效力上又有何態(tài)度,以及我國(guó)該以何種標(biāo)準(zhǔn)承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行或者拒絕承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行該被撤銷了的裁決。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分,第一部分對(duì)已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的域外效力進(jìn)行概述,論述了國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決被撤銷的含義和域外效力的含義,以及分析“國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決被撤銷”和“域外效力”之間聯(lián)系的必然性,并探討已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決域外效力的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。第二部分闡述了已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的域外效力的成因,從有關(guān)國(guó)家國(guó)內(nèi)法的不同規(guī)定和具體的理論學(xué)說(shuō)兩方面來(lái)探討。第三部分闡述了已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的域外效力的國(guó)際法依據(jù),從《紐約公約》和其它公約中尋找依據(jù)。最后論述已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決在中國(guó)的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的現(xiàn)狀以及完善建議。
[Abstract]:At present, all countries have not reached agreement on whether the arbitral award has the extraterritorial effect of international commercial arbitral awards, but the general trend in the world is that the adherents of the traditional theory still believe that the international commercial arbitral awards that have been revoked are not extraterritorial, unless the international treaties have the opposite provisions; and the majority of scholars believe that it is on a certain premise or Under conditions, the revocation of the award does not necessarily lead to the extraterritorial effect of the adjudication. There are different reasons for the revocation of the award, even in the state given the extraterritorial effect of the arbitral award that has been revoked, and the revocation on the basis of the provisions of international law is not very controversial, but the withdrawal on the basis of the provisions of the domestic law is carried out. The decision made by the court to revoke the adjudication in its territory has the basis of domestic law; the decision of the court of execution affirms whether the arbitral award of the international commercial arbitral award has the extraterritorial effect or the basis of the domestic law. The domestic law is a law formulated by the sovereign states within the jurisdiction of each sovereign state. It is based on the principle of state sovereignty and territorial jurisdiction. However, the provisions of various domestic laws vary widely and disputes are inevitable.
The issue of the extraterritorial effect of the revocation of international commercial arbitral awards has caused great repercussions in the field of arbitration. The main issues discussed in this paper are: if the international commercial arbitration award is revoked by the ruling National Court, whether the Executive Court can still carry out the revoked award, and recognize and implement or refuse to comply with the criteria. In recognition and implementation of the revoked award, our country has the attitude of revoking the extraterritorial effect of the international commercial arbitral award, as well as our country's criteria for recognizing and implementing or refusing to recognize and implement the revoked adjudication.
This article is divided into four parts. The first part summarizes the extraterritorial effect of the revoked international commercial arbitration award, expounds the meaning of the revocation of the international commercial arbitration award and the meaning of the extraterritorial effect, and analyzes the inevitability of the connection between the revocation of international commercial arbitration award and the extraterritorial effect, and discusses the revocation of the country. The development trend of the extraterritorial effect of international commercial arbitration award. The second part expounds the causes of the extraterritorial effects of the revocation of international commercial arbitral awards, from the two aspects of the relevant state domestic law and the specific theory and theory. The third part expounds the international legal basis for the extraterritorial effect of the revocation of international commercial arbitral awards. From the New York Convention and other conventions, we will find the basis. Finally, we will discuss the status and suggestions for the recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitral awards in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜新麗;論外國(guó)仲裁裁決在我國(guó)的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行——兼論《紐約公約》在中國(guó)的適用[J];比較法研究;2005年04期

2 肖威;;“非國(guó)內(nèi)化”仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行問(wèn)題研究[J];北京仲裁;2004年03期

3 謝新勝;;論爭(zhēng)中的已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決之承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[J];北京仲裁;2007年03期

4 李灃樺;;強(qiáng)制性規(guī)則與公共政策在商事仲裁裁決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行中的適用研究[J];北京仲裁;2009年02期

5 曾濤;論示范法的理論基礎(chǔ)及其在中國(guó)的運(yùn)用[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年03期

6 宋連斌,黃進(jìn);《中華人民共和國(guó)仲裁法》(建議修改稿)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2003年04期

7 楊成龍;;淺析我國(guó)撤銷仲裁裁決制度的完善——最高院頒布關(guān)于仲裁法適用司法解釋之后[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年11期

8 熊育輝;我國(guó)國(guó)際私法關(guān)于“公共秩序”立法的審視[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2005年04期

9 趙秀文;論國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的國(guó)籍及其撤銷的理論與實(shí)踐[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2002年01期

10 郭玉軍,陳芝蘭;論國(guó)際商事仲裁中的“非國(guó)內(nèi)化”理論[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2003年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊弘磊;中國(guó)內(nèi)地司法實(shí)踐視角下的《紐約公約》問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 江仁所;論已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

2 周國(guó)杰;論承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行已撤銷國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2015252