本文選題：低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金 + 組織形式　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：自20世紀(jì)80年代以來，極端天氣的頻發(fā)、海平面的上升以及自然災(zāi)害的增加，給人類的健康和生存環(huán)境造成了巨大威脅，全球氣候變化問題日益受到關(guān)注。面對全球氣候變化日益加劇的現(xiàn)實(shí)，，世界各國開始轉(zhuǎn)變傳統(tǒng)觀念，進(jìn)行能源技術(shù)和減排技術(shù)創(chuàng)新，嘗試建立以低排放、低污染、低能耗為基礎(chǔ)的低碳型經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展模式。隨著低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)被推崇為解決當(dāng)前氣候變化問題的最有效方式，碳基金也得到了迅猛的發(fā)展，不斷衍生出新的金融產(chǎn)品。目前，在發(fā)達(dá)國家和地區(qū)，碳基金早已不再是為了購買碳信用而設(shè)立的簡單的融資工具，而是更多的致力于在全球范圍內(nèi)進(jìn)行低碳項(xiàng)目的直接投資。我國是世界上最大的核證減排量市場，碳金融市場十分廣闊。發(fā)展我國自己的低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金，正是在結(jié)合國外發(fā)展碳基金的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)與我國現(xiàn)實(shí)情況的基礎(chǔ)上，為實(shí)現(xiàn)我國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的低碳化轉(zhuǎn)型而做出的有益嘗試。 本文首先對碳基金的產(chǎn)生背景以及國內(nèi)外碳基金的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了簡單的介紹，并對低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了界定，同時(shí)分析了我國低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金的法律規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀。在此基礎(chǔ)之上，本文以低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金的運(yùn)營過程為基線，從低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金的組織形式、資金募集、內(nèi)部治理以及退出機(jī)制四個(gè)方面對有關(guān)法律問題進(jìn)行了探討。在組織形式的選擇方面，本文對不同組織形式進(jìn)行法律分析與比較，認(rèn)為我國低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金宜采用有限合伙的組織形式，并通過對其他國家與地區(qū)立法實(shí)踐的比較分析，提出了進(jìn)一步明確其法律地位的建議。在資金募集方面，本文從募集人與募集對象兩個(gè)方面對我國立法現(xiàn)狀及存在的法律問題進(jìn)行了分析，并通過與其他國家和地區(qū)私募基金募集人及募集對象立法之間的比較分析，探討了符合我國低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)特點(diǎn)的立法完善方向。鑒于我國低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金宜選擇有限合伙型組織形式，在內(nèi)部治理方面，本文針對我國現(xiàn)有法律框架內(nèi)的有限合伙型低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金內(nèi)部治理機(jī)制及存在問題進(jìn)行了分析，在考察了其他國家和地區(qū)內(nèi)部治理機(jī)制的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上，探討了符合低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金的制度安排。最后，在退出機(jī)制方面，本文討論分析了適于低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金的退出方式及我國退出機(jī)制中存在的法律障礙，并通過對具有成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)的代表性國家退出機(jī)制的考察分析，提出了我國低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金退出機(jī)制的完善建議。
[Abstract]:Since 1980s, the frequent occurrence of extreme weather, the rise of sea level and the increase of natural disasters have posed a great threat to human health and living environment, and the problem of global climate change has been paid more and more attention. In the face of the increasing global climate change, countries around the world began to change the traditional concept, energy technology and emission reduction technology innovation, and try to establish a low-carbon economy based on low emissions, low pollution and low energy consumption. With the low-carbon economy being praised as the most effective way to solve the current climate change problem, carbon funds have also been rapidly developed, and new financial products have been continuously derived. At present, in developed countries and regions, the carbon fund is no longer a simple financing instrument to buy carbon credit, but more committed to the global direct investment in low-carbon projects. China is the world's largest certified emission reduction market, carbon finance market is very broad. The development of China's own low-carbon industry investment fund is based on the successful experience of foreign countries in developing carbon funds and the reality of our country. This paper first introduces the background of carbon fund and the development status of carbon fund at home and abroad. The connotation of low carbon industry investment fund is defined, and the present situation of legal regulation of low carbon industry investment fund is analyzed. On this basis, this paper takes the operating process of low-carbon industry investment fund as the baseline, and discusses the relevant legal issues from four aspects: the organization form of the low carbon industry investment fund, the fund raising, the internal governance and the withdrawal mechanism. In the aspect of the choice of organization form, this paper makes a legal analysis and comparison of different forms of organization, and thinks that our country's low-carbon industry investment fund should adopt the organization form of limited partnership, and through the comparative analysis of legislative practice of other countries and regions, Some suggestions are put forward to further clarify its legal status. In the aspect of raising funds, this paper analyzes the current situation of legislation and the existing legal problems in our country from the aspects of the collector and the object of raising, and through the comparative analysis with other countries and regions between the legislation of private fund raiser and the object of raising. This paper probes into the direction of legislative perfection in line with the characteristics of low carbon industry in China. In view of the choice of limited partnership organization form in China's low-carbon industry investment fund, this paper analyzes the internal governance mechanism and existing problems of the limited partnership low carbon industry investment fund within the existing legal framework of our country. Based on the successful experience of internal governance mechanism in other countries and regions, this paper discusses the institutional arrangement of low carbon industry investment fund. Finally, in the aspect of exit mechanism, this paper discusses and analyzes the exit mode suitable for low-carbon industry investment fund and the legal obstacles in China's exit mechanism, and analyzes the exit mechanism of representative countries with successful experience. Put forward our country low carbon industry investment fund exit mechanism perfect suggestion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉少波;都宜金;;低碳技術(shù)和產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀與對策[J];安徽科技;2009年12期

2 張蕾;證券投資基金發(fā)起人的法律地位之探討[J];北京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2003年04期

3 朱國睿;;私募股權(quán)投資基金IPO退出機(jī)制的法律研究[J];中國城市經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年18期

4 尚文程;;中國居民儲蓄行為研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)界;2011年05期

5 曾剛;萬志宏;;國際碳金融市場:現(xiàn)狀、問題與前景[J];國際金融研究;2009年10期

6 陸靜;;后京都時(shí)代碳金融發(fā)展的法律路徑[J];國際金融研究;2010年08期

7 黃海滄;;國際碳基金運(yùn)行模式研究[J];廣西財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

8 任衛(wèi)峰;;低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)與環(huán)境金融創(chuàng)新[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年03期

9 羅玉中;李程富;徐娜;;關(guān)于私募股權(quán)基金退出機(jī)制的研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)視角(中旬);2011年06期

10 青木昌彥;硅谷模式的信息與治理結(jié)構(gòu)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會體制比較;2000年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 呂錦\

本文編號：2007999