本文選題：跨境刑事取證 + 立法模式　； 參考：《證據(jù)科學(xué)》2016年01期

【摘要】：隨著歐洲一體化進(jìn)程的深入,歐盟及其成員國在打擊跨境犯罪和犯罪分子自由流動(dòng)上存在著共同利益,但要制定一部超越國別的歐盟刑事證據(jù)法典依然遙不可期。在跨境刑事取證立法中,歐盟存在著統(tǒng)一規(guī)則和相互承認(rèn)兩種立法模式,從現(xiàn)有立法看,后一種模式已成為歐盟立法者的現(xiàn)實(shí)選擇。在后里斯本時(shí)代,歐盟在跨境刑事取證上實(shí)現(xiàn)了"超國家"的立法運(yùn)作,歐盟跨境刑事取證立法存在著兩種模式融合的趨勢。歐盟的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)對中國區(qū)際刑事取證立法有重要啟示。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the European integration process, the EU and its member states have common interests in combating cross-border crime and the free movement of criminals, but it is still impossible to formulate a EU criminal evidence code that transcends countries. In the legislation of cross-border criminal forensics, there are two legislative models in EU: uniform rules and mutual recognition. From the current legislation, the latter model has become the realistic choice for EU legislators. In the post-Lisbon era, the EU has realized the "supranational" legislative operation in cross-border criminal forensics, and there is a trend of integration of the two models in EU cross-border criminal forensics legislation. The EU's legislative experience has important implications for China's inter-regional criminal forensics legislation.
【作者單位】： 山東大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2015年最高人民檢察院檢察理論研究課題“職務(wù)犯罪跨境追逃中的證據(jù)問題研究”(編號(hào):GJ2015D07)的研究成果 “2011計(jì)劃”司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心資助
【分類號(hào)】：D997.9
，

本文編號(hào)：1997026