再論商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口
本文選題:商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口 + 法律關(guān)系三要素; 參考:《中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院》2011年碩士論文
【摘要】:商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題由來(lái)已久,它是伴隨著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的發(fā)展和國(guó)際貿(mào)易自由化的推進(jìn)而產(chǎn)生的。法律界對(duì)于商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的禁與行爭(zhēng)議頗多,主要是從知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利用盡理論和地域性原則入手來(lái)討論,最近幾年也有文章從商標(biāo)的功能論著手來(lái)探討,取得了一定進(jìn)展。本文試圖避開(kāi)商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的禁與行問(wèn)題,不追求從抽象層面得出一個(gè)確切結(jié)論,而是希望找到一個(gè)解決該問(wèn)題的辦法。首先,筆者利用法學(xué)基本理論,通過(guò)法律關(guān)系的三要素(主體、客體、內(nèi)容)來(lái)認(rèn)識(shí)商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口,指出了目前在該問(wèn)題上廣泛存在的一些認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū),同時(shí)從基本法理的角度來(lái)探討進(jìn)口國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)人的權(quán)利,特別是“平行進(jìn)口權(quán)”問(wèn)題。在以上認(rèn)識(shí)的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者分析了支持和反對(duì)商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的兩種理論(權(quán)利用盡理論和地域性原則),并得出這兩種理論并不能很好的解決商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的爭(zhēng)論。由于商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題的實(shí)質(zhì)是各利益群體特別是各國(guó)利益的博弈,筆者在對(duì)各國(guó)立法和司法現(xiàn)狀解析的基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合論文前半部分對(duì)商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題的基本法理分析,得出結(jié)論,認(rèn)為中國(guó)目前解決平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題暫時(shí)沒(méi)有必要專門(mén)立法,而是可以通過(guò)商標(biāo)的功能理論,在現(xiàn)有法律的基礎(chǔ)上,具體案件具體分析,以最大限度地維護(hù)本國(guó)利益,同時(shí)在各種不同的利益群體中找到平衡點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:The problem of trademark parallel import has a long history, which comes into being with the development of intellectual property and the promotion of international trade liberalization. There are a lot of disputes about the prohibition and practice of trademark parallel import in the legal circles, which are mainly discussed from the theory of exhaustion of intellectual property rights and the principle of regionalism. In recent years, some articles have been discussed from the perspective of trademark function theory, and some progress has been made. This paper attempts to avoid the problem of parallel import of trademarks and does not seek to draw an exact conclusion from the abstract level, but to find a solution to this problem. First of all, the author uses the basic theory of law, through the three elements of legal relationship (subject, object, content) to understand the parallel import of trademarks, pointed out that there are some misunderstanding in this issue. At the same time, this paper discusses the rights of trademark owners in importing countries, especially the issue of parallel import rights from the point of view of basic legal theory. On the basis of the above understanding, the author analyzes the two theories of supporting and opposing trademark parallel import (the exhaustion of rights theory and the regional principle), and concludes that these two theories can not solve the dispute of trademark parallel import. Because the essence of trademark parallel import is the game of the interests of various interest groups, especially the national interests, the author analyzes the basic legal theory of trademark parallel import on the basis of the analysis of the legislation and judicial status of various countries, combined with the first half of the thesis. It is concluded that there is no need for special legislation to solve the problem of parallel import in China at present. Instead, we can use the functional theory of trademarks, on the basis of existing laws, to make concrete analysis of specific cases in order to maximize the protection of our own interests. At the same time in a variety of different interest groups to find a balance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D997.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李明德;美國(guó)商標(biāo)法中的平行進(jìn)口[J];中華商標(biāo);2002年07期
2 康佑發(fā);;商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口國(guó)際比較分析[J];中華商標(biāo);2009年06期
3 代高潔;;商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的反壟斷法規(guī)制[J];創(chuàng)新;2010年03期
4 譚紅,吳韶艷;商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口“真品”例外簡(jiǎn)介[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年06期
5 蘭宜生;國(guó)際灰市場(chǎng)的發(fā)展及其影響[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2001年04期
6 黃暉;內(nèi)外有別——商標(biāo)權(quán)利用盡的判例與立法[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;1999年04期
7 余翔;實(shí)質(zhì)性差別——美國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)耗盡與平行進(jìn)口法律演變及現(xiàn)行準(zhǔn)則[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2001年03期
8 趙陽(yáng);呂瑛;;商標(biāo)商品平行進(jìn)口的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法分析[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期
9 馬宗文;;壟斷亦或自由競(jìng)爭(zhēng)——我國(guó)對(duì)待商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的應(yīng)然選擇[J];開(kāi)封教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期
10 張慧霞;;商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口中的“真品”研究[J];徐州工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期
,本文編號(hào):1982285
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/1982285.html