本文選題：刑事被告人 + 人權(quán)保障�。� 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會的發(fā)展，法治也越來越健全。人權(quán)已不再是一個陌生的概念，，人權(quán)理念的確立、人權(quán)的保障已漸漸融入到了我國的法治進(jìn)程中。所謂人權(quán)，就是屬于人或者關(guān)于人的權(quán)利，即人作為人所應(yīng)該享有的、不可被剝奪或轉(zhuǎn)讓的權(quán)利，是人之所以為人的最基本的權(quán)利，是個人參與社會活動的基礎(chǔ)，是個人享有政治權(quán)力、參與國家管理的基石。近年來，人權(quán)保障問題受到世界各國政府和公民的不斷關(guān)注。但實際上，人權(quán)在具有普遍適用性的同時，還具有個性。例如，在不同國家在不同時期追求的人權(quán)內(nèi)容是不同的，同時不同社會群體之間的人權(quán)內(nèi)容也是存在差異的，當(dāng)然還表現(xiàn)在很多其他方面。本文我們將探討人權(quán)的個性，以及人權(quán)個性在刑事被告人這一社會群體中所表現(xiàn)出來的其他相關(guān)問題。所謂刑事被告人的人權(quán)是指在刑事訴訟過程中，具有被告人身份的公民，法律規(guī)范予以確認(rèn)的其所有的權(quán)利和自由。刑事被告人的人權(quán)并不專屬于某一個人，而是屬于在刑事訴訟這一特定條件下具有被告人身份的這一類人的權(quán)利。所以，侵犯刑事被告人的權(quán)利的同時也意味著對所有公民權(quán)利的侵犯。在我國剛剛通過的新刑事訴訟法中，已將“尊重和保障人權(quán)”寫入總則，而這里所提到的保障人權(quán)就是保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人和罪犯的訴訟權(quán)利，可見，我國已越來越關(guān)注對這些特殊群體的權(quán)利保障。 本文通過使用價值分析方法、歷史分析方法、比較分析方法、規(guī)范分析方法等方法來研究我國刑事被告人這一類特殊群體的人權(quán)保障問題。在本文的第一部分，主要介紹了關(guān)于人權(quán)及刑事被告人人權(quán)的一些基本理論，并側(cè)重闡述刑事被告人人權(quán)在不同社會群體之間的特性，例如關(guān)于刑事被告人概念的界定和特征。第二部分通過價值分析方法分析刑事被告人人權(quán)保障的一些法律價值，保障刑事被告人這一特殊群體的人權(quán)是法律追求正義、安全、自由等法律價值的體現(xiàn)。第三部分通過對一些國際法律規(guī)范和我國在2012年的刑事訴訟法中關(guān)于被告人人權(quán)保障的分析，總結(jié)我國刑事被告人人權(quán)保障已經(jīng)取得的成績和存在的一些問題。在第四部分，針對司法實踐中存在的問題提出了相關(guān)建議，主要包括更新司法理念，樹立保障被告人人權(quán)的價值觀，構(gòu)建科學(xué)、合理的法律制度等，進(jìn)而體現(xiàn)被告人人權(quán)保障的法律價值。
[Abstract]:With the development of society, the rule of law is becoming more and more perfect. Human rights is no longer a strange concept. With the establishment of the concept of human rights, the protection of human rights has gradually merged into the process of rule of law in our country. The so-called human rights, which belong to or are related to human rights, that is, the rights that human beings should enjoy as human beings and which cannot be deprived or transferred, are the most basic rights of human beings and the basis for individuals to participate in social activities. It is the cornerstone of individual political power and participation in the administration of the country. In recent years, the protection of human rights has been concerned by governments and citizens all over the world. But in fact, human rights have both universal applicability and personality. For example, the content of human rights pursued in different countries at different times is different, at the same time, the content of human rights among different social groups is also different, of course, there are many other aspects. In this paper, we will discuss the personality of human rights and other related problems in the social group of criminal defendants. The human rights of criminal defendants refer to all the rights and freedoms recognized by legal norms in the process of criminal proceedings. The human rights of a criminal defendant does not belong to a person, but to a person who has the status of a defendant under the specific condition of criminal procedure. Therefore, the violation of the rights of the accused also means the violation of all civil rights. In the new criminal procedure law that has just been adopted in our country, "respecting and protecting human rights" has been written into the general principle, and the protection of human rights mentioned here is to guarantee the procedural rights of criminal suspects, defendants and criminals. China has paid more and more attention to the protection of the rights of these special groups. This paper studies the protection of human rights of the special group of criminal defendants in China by means of the methods of value analysis, historical analysis, comparative analysis, normative analysis and so on. In the first part of this paper, we mainly introduce some basic theories about human rights and human rights of criminal defendants, and focus on the characteristics of human rights of criminal defendants in different social groups, such as the definition and characteristics of the concept of criminal defendants. The second part analyzes the legal value of the human rights protection of the criminal defendant through the method of value analysis. The protection of the human rights of this special group of criminal defendants is the embodiment of the legal value of the law in pursuit of justice, security, freedom and so on. The third part summarizes the achievements and problems of human rights protection of criminal defendants in our country through the analysis of some international legal norms and the human rights protection of defendants in our criminal procedure law in 2012. In the fourth part, in view of the problems existing in the judicial practice, the author puts forward some relevant suggestions, including updating the judicial concept, establishing the values of protecting the human rights of the accused, constructing a scientific and reasonable legal system, etc. And then embody the legal value of the defendant's human rights protection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D925.2;D998.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 尚華;偵查中犯罪嫌疑人人權(quán)保障問題的思考[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期

2 宋英輝;羅海敏;;《刑事訴訟法》修改的理念與原則[J];中國司法;2006年03期

3 張普定;簡論刑事偵查階段辯護(hù)制度之完善[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年02期

4 樊崇義,李艷玲;刑事訴訟法再修改要論[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年01期

5 倪業(yè)群;沉默權(quán):犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的憲法權(quán)利[J];廣西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年03期

6 范紅麗;張麗平;滕素霞;;刑事犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的訴訟權(quán)利之我見[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年01期

7 段啟俊;;疑罪案件中人權(quán)保障的對策研究[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年03期

8 張愛欽;控制犯罪和保障人權(quán)[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年06期

9 彭旭輝,陳曉雯;論刑事訴訟中對犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人權(quán)保護(hù)[J];湖南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年05期

10 吳曉峰;淺談訴訟中實體公正與程序公正的沖突與選擇[J];淮南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 王鑫;犯罪嫌疑人人權(quán)保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀與完善研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2005年

2 張麗;我國犯罪嫌疑人人權(quán)保障的法理分析[D];中南民族大學(xué);2008年

3 黃亮;罪犯人權(quán)的憲法保障問題研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2007年

4 張璐;犯罪嫌疑人人權(quán)保障問題研究[D];河北大學(xué);2008年

5 王學(xué)輝;論實體正義與程序正義的辯證統(tǒng)一[D];重慶大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：1974216