本文選題：博斯曼判決 + 歐盟法律　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文采用歷史學(xué)的研究方法，分析了在博斯曼判決框架下歐盟法律與體育行業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)則是如何進(jìn)行博弈的，并在此視野下闡述了運(yùn)動(dòng)員自由流動(dòng)權(quán)利的演變過(guò)程，為讀者展示了一幅鮮為人知的歷史畫(huà)卷。在當(dāng)今的歐盟法規(guī)則內(nèi)，運(yùn)動(dòng)員的權(quán)益，特別是自由流動(dòng)的權(quán)利是受到法律最大化保障的，體育界的內(nèi)部規(guī)則是不能排除歐盟法而單獨(dú)適用的。然而在20世紀(jì)歐盟成立之初，特別是在博斯曼判決產(chǎn)生之前，體育行業(yè)的內(nèi)部規(guī)則卻一直與歐盟法律出于對(duì)抗的狀態(tài)，甚至占據(jù)上風(fēng)。運(yùn)動(dòng)員自由流動(dòng)的權(quán)利也歷經(jīng)了由不平等趨向平等地演進(jìn)過(guò)程。尊重對(duì)客觀歷史的考察，運(yùn)用理性思維對(duì)歐盟法律、政治、體育文化進(jìn)行探討和分析，并在此基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行反思，有針對(duì)性的摸索出社會(huì)進(jìn)步，文化變遷，法律發(fā)展之間的深刻聯(lián)系，揭示法律精神之所在，從中發(fā)現(xiàn)其當(dāng)代意義，特別是在第29屆北京奧運(yùn)會(huì)勝利召開(kāi)之后，使我們倍加珍惜中國(guó)法制進(jìn)程中所取得的輝煌成就與對(duì)未來(lái)體育法制發(fā)展的期望是本文的選題價(jià)值。國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者從不同的角度對(duì)博斯曼判決進(jìn)行了分析，本文筆者采用黃世席教授的研究視角（自由流動(dòng)權(quán)利）。但又加以創(chuàng)新，從歐盟法與體育行業(yè)規(guī)則的博弈這一具體層面出發(fā)，通過(guò)階段分析，案例支撐的研究方法將博斯曼判決所代表的運(yùn)動(dòng)員自由流動(dòng)權(quán)利的演變過(guò)程完整的呈現(xiàn)出來(lái)。 本文具體內(nèi)容分為以下四個(gè)部分：第一部分引言主要敘述了本文寫(xiě)作之理論意義、研究方法與國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究?jī)?nèi)容；第二部分，歐盟體育行業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)則對(duì)運(yùn)動(dòng)員自由流動(dòng)權(quán)利一直持否定態(tài)度，直到Walrave/Koch判決，Dona判決，Heylens判決的出現(xiàn)才為博斯曼判決鋪平了法律道路；第三部分，博斯曼判決宣告了歐盟法律在與體育行業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)則的博弈中取得了勝利。使運(yùn)動(dòng)員自由流動(dòng)的權(quán)利得到了法律保障，博斯曼法案也為后續(xù)相關(guān)案例提供了法理支撐；第四部分，正如王謙先生所講，任何制度都要不斷適應(yīng)新環(huán)境，不斷改進(jìn)。博斯曼判決及由此衍生的博斯曼法案同樣為博斯曼本人及歐盟體育界帶來(lái)了諸多負(fù)面影響，，它并沒(méi)有完全化解體育行業(yè)規(guī)則與歐盟法律的深層次矛盾。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author uses the historical research method to analyze how the EU law and the internal rules of the sports industry play a game under the framework of Bosman judgment, and expounds the evolvement process of the athlete's right of free flow from this perspective. It shows readers a little-known picture of history. In today's EU law, the rights and interests of athletes, especially the right of free movement, are guaranteed by law maximization, and the internal rules of sports cannot be excluded and applied separately. However, at the beginning of the 20th century, especially before the Bosman decision, the internal rules of the sports industry have been in a state of confrontation with the EU law, and even gained the upper hand. The right of free movement of athletes has also undergone the process of evolution from inequality to equality. Respect for the objective history, use rational thinking to explore and analyze EU law, politics, sports culture, and on this basis, to explore the social progress and cultural changes. The deep connection between the development of law, reveals the legal spirit, finds its contemporary significance, especially after the 29th Beijing Olympic Games successfully held, It is the value of this paper to make us treasure the brilliant achievements in the process of Chinese legal system and the expectation of the development of sports legal system in the future. Scholars at home and abroad have analyzed the Bosman judgment from different angles. In this paper, the author adopts the research perspective of Professor Huang Shishi (the right of free flow). But it also innovates, starting from the specific level of the game between EU law and the rules of the sports industry, through the stage analysis, The research method of case support presents the evolution process of athlete's free flow right represented by Bosman judgment. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part of the introduction mainly describes the theoretical significance of this writing, research methods and related research at home and abroad, the second part, EU rules within the sports industry have been negative about the right to free movement of athletes until the appearance of the Walrave/Koch ruling, which paved the way for Bosman's ruling; part three. The Bosman ruling declared a victory for EU law in the game against the internal rules of the sports industry. The right to free movement of athletes is guaranteed by law, and the Bosman Act provides legal support for subsequent cases; part IV, as Mr Wang Qian said, any system must be constantly adapted to new circumstances and constantly improved. The Bosman decision and the resulting Bosman Act have also brought a lot of negative effects to Bosman himself and the EU sports world, and it has not completely resolved the deep contradiction between the rules of the sports industry and the EU law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 郭樹(shù)理;CAS體育仲裁若干問(wèn)題探討[J];比較法研究;2004年05期

2 肖海婷;李艷翎;;當(dāng)前體育法規(guī)研究的熱點(diǎn)與問(wèn)題[J];體育科學(xué)研究;2004年04期

3 葉濤;;博斯曼法案10年反省[J];足球俱樂(lè)部;2005年16期

本文編號(hào)：1945252