本文選題：涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)行為 + 涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)管轄權(quán)��； 參考：《北方工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：由于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的技術(shù)與時(shí)俱進(jìn)的不斷發(fā)展著,人們生活的各個(gè)部分與網(wǎng)絡(luò)之間變得更加密不可分。網(wǎng)絡(luò)的空間更像是種數(shù)字化的存在,而非現(xiàn)實(shí)的存在,[1]因此在網(wǎng)絡(luò)背后是物理世界的人在網(wǎng)上做出的一個(gè)個(gè)行為,全世界各地的人都可以同處于一個(gè)虛擬平臺(tái)中發(fā)布言論觀點(diǎn)、傳遞與交換數(shù)據(jù)信息、進(jìn)行各類交易活動(dòng)等等,所以未曾有過(guò)的聯(lián)系也就自然出現(xiàn),隨之而來(lái)的是不可避免的涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題。誠(chéng)然跳出現(xiàn)實(shí)視角互聯(lián)網(wǎng)就像是一個(gè)獨(dú)立個(gè)體空間,但網(wǎng)絡(luò)使用者仍然是現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的公民,虛擬聯(lián)系現(xiàn)實(shí)的關(guān)系密不可分,所以它仍需要受到實(shí)際法律的管控。探索網(wǎng)絡(luò)無(wú)邊界性、虛擬性和自治性的特征,并且認(rèn)真審視由它而生的諸如各國(guó)黑客通過(guò)侵襲他國(guó)的電腦系統(tǒng)、跨國(guó)傳播電腦病毒等等具有明顯涉外因素的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)行為,對(duì)解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)管轄權(quán)有著很大的幫助。不斷變革更新的網(wǎng)絡(luò)以及立法本身的滯后性限制,使得以屬地管轄、屬人管轄、協(xié)議管轄和專屬管轄為主的傳統(tǒng)民事訴訟管轄體制受到了極大地沖擊,很大程度上動(dòng)搖了相關(guān)傳統(tǒng)法學(xué)理論。因而關(guān)于涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)管轄權(quán)的新理論紛紛涌現(xiàn)而出,各國(guó)也隨之探索出適應(yīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)新挑戰(zhàn)和本國(guó)實(shí)際情況的相關(guān)司法實(shí)踐,中國(guó)便是其中之一。本文經(jīng)由國(guó)際私法的角度切入,按邏輯順序分為四個(gè)章節(jié)。第一部分重點(diǎn)解析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)的特征,研究了網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)行為的內(nèi)涵和涉外因素。第二部分主要闡述了傳統(tǒng)國(guó)際民事訴訟管轄權(quán)確立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及網(wǎng)絡(luò)對(duì)其的挑戰(zhàn)。第三部分重點(diǎn)厘清了確定涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)管轄權(quán)的新理論以及許多國(guó)家的司法實(shí)踐。第四部分剖析了中國(guó)涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)管轄權(quán)的法律現(xiàn)狀,力求通過(guò)研究厘清涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)的管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題,為我國(guó)這部分的相關(guān)法律提出完善建議。
[Abstract]:With the development of the technology of Internet, every part of people's life and network become more and more inseparable. The space of the web is more like a digital existence than a physical existence, [1] so behind the network is the behavior of people in the physical world on the Internet, where people from all over the world can share their opinions on the same virtual platform. Transmission and exchange of data information, all kinds of trading activities, so that there has not been any connection will naturally appear, followed by the inevitable foreign network infringement problem. It is true that the Internet is like an independent individual space from the perspective of reality, but the network user is still a citizen of the real society, and the relationship between virtual contact and reality is inseparable, so it still needs to be controlled by the actual law. Exploring the characteristics of the network that is borderless, fictitious and autonomous, and taking a careful look at the network infringement resulting from it, such as hackers from various countries who invade other countries' computer systems, transnational transmission of computer viruses, and so on, which have obvious foreign factors. To solve the network infringement jurisdiction has the very big help. The constantly changing network and the lag limitation of the legislation itself make the traditional jurisdiction system of civil action, which is based on territorial jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, agreement jurisdiction and exclusive jurisdiction, has been greatly impacted. To a large extent, the traditional theory of law has been shaken. As a result, new theories about foreign network tort jurisdiction have emerged, and various countries have also explored relevant judicial practices to adapt to the new network challenges and their own actual conditions, among which China is one of them. From the perspective of private international law, this paper is divided into four chapters in logical order. The first part focuses on the analysis of the characteristics of the network, the connotation of network tort and foreign factors. The second part mainly elaborated the traditional international civil action jurisdiction establishment standard and the network challenge to it. The third part mainly clarifies the new theory of determining the jurisdiction of foreign network infringement and the judicial practice of many countries. The fourth part analyzes the current legal situation of the foreign network tort jurisdiction in China, and tries to clarify the jurisdiction of the foreign network infringement through the study, and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the relevant laws in this part of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫尚鴻;;中國(guó)涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)管轄權(quán)研究[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2015年02期

2 孫尚鴻;;涉網(wǎng)侵權(quán)案件管轄權(quán)的確定——以《布魯塞爾民商事管轄權(quán)規(guī)則》為視角[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2009年04期

3 孫會(huì)玲;國(guó)際私法管轄權(quán)在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中面臨的挑戰(zhàn)和解決途徑[J];中共南京市委黨校南京市行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

4 黃進(jìn),何其生;電子商務(wù)與沖突法的變革[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2003年01期

5 侯捷;網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件管轄權(quán)探析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年08期

6 韓紅云;;從國(guó)際法看國(guó)家對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的管轄[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律評(píng)論;2001年00期

7 卓翔;對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件的司法管轄權(quán)[J];法學(xué)論壇;2001年03期

8 肖永平,李臣;國(guó)際私法在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下面臨的挑戰(zhàn)[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年01期

9 王德全;試論Internet案件的司法管轄權(quán)[J];中外法學(xué);1998年02期

10 張廣榮;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的法律問(wèn)題[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;1996年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 常海;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時(shí)代網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件的管轄權(quán)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

2 茅友生;網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題的研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1944809