本文選題：反假冒 + 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)��； 參考：《上海社會科學(xué)院》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)議(ACTA)始于2006年，是以美、歐、日等知識產(chǎn)權(quán)大國為主的發(fā)達(dá)國家發(fā)起的，因不滿足于《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)定》（TRIPS協(xié)議）對于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)力度，特別是針對產(chǎn)品假冒和盜版問題的執(zhí)法，旨在協(xié)議成員方之間建立一個知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法實施的新標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，而經(jīng)過多輪談判達(dá)成的多邊貿(mào)易協(xié)議�！斗醇倜百Q(mào)易協(xié)議》的目的是確立全面的國際框架，幫助各締約方在協(xié)議框架下有效打擊知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)行為，尤其是假冒盜版活動，從而保證全球經(jīng)濟(jì)的合法貿(mào)易和可持續(xù)發(fā)展。《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)議》旨在減少版權(quán)和商標(biāo)盜用行為，以保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，來保護(hù)正當(dāng)貿(mào)易和世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的持續(xù)發(fā)展，并共同建立一套主管機(jī)關(guān)使用的最佳實踐的實施規(guī)則。雖然出于保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的立場，但ACTA涉及的內(nèi)容將發(fā)展中國家置于了不利的地位，因為這一協(xié)定主要針對在第三世界國家的產(chǎn)業(yè)布局中占據(jù)一定地位的代工產(chǎn)品和“山寨”貨品。而協(xié)議的整個起草協(xié)商過程也排斥了大部分發(fā)展中國家，幾乎是在秘密的狀態(tài)中進(jìn)行，未曾邀請發(fā)展中國家代表參與協(xié)商。至今，發(fā)達(dá)國家與發(fā)展中國家仍就《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)議》中加強(qiáng)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法的相關(guān)提議爭論不休。TRIPs協(xié)議為國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)競爭格局的形成制造了一個高起點(diǎn)，但作為不同利益集團(tuán)相互妥協(xié)的產(chǎn)物，它也為各個國家提供了一種可能，即在既定的規(guī)則下，利用政策空間，選擇 適合于自身經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展模式的合理知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展路徑。中國加入WTO后，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)措施逐步與國際接軌，并建立了自己的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律體系和執(zhí)法規(guī)則。然而，作為發(fā)展中國家，中國國內(nèi)遍布的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)行為及其在國際貿(mào)易上的滲透依然是不少知識產(chǎn)權(quán)既得利益國孜孜不倦的話題。中國的發(fā)展，既要保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，同樣需要在發(fā)達(dá)國家建立的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)體系中為自身利益考慮。中國在盡力履行國際義務(wù)，展現(xiàn)大國形象，提高國際地位的同時，基于國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和政策基礎(chǔ)，用盡國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)規(guī)則中的的彈性空間，及時調(diào)整國內(nèi)法和相關(guān)政策，著眼于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的適度合理保護(hù)，，采用積極的回應(yīng)政策以維護(hù)國家現(xiàn)實利益，促進(jìn)社會主義特色經(jīng)濟(jì)的良性可持續(xù)發(fā)展，是既定的經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序下我國制定知 識產(chǎn)權(quán)政策的合理選擇。本文共分為四章，第一章敘述知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際保護(hù)的發(fā)展背景及ACTA的誕生過程；第二章為ACTA的內(nèi)容評述，重點(diǎn)通過與TRIPS協(xié)議相關(guān)條款的比較來闡述ACTA在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度方面的不同特征；第三章為通過ACTA對于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度發(fā)展的推動性能來看知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度的擴(kuò)張及其對發(fā)展中國家的影響；第四章為ACTA對中國的影響及中國可能采取的應(yīng)對措施。
[Abstract]:The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTAA) started in 2006 and was initiated by developed countries, such as the United States, Europe, Japan, and other major intellectual property countries, because they are not satisfied with the trips Agreement on Trade-Related intellectual property Rights (trips). In particular, enforcement against counterfeiting and piracy of products is aimed at establishing a new standard for the enforcement of intellectual property rights among the parties to the agreement. The purpose of the "Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement" is to establish a comprehensive international framework to help parties effectively combat intellectual property rights violations, especially counterfeiting, within the framework of the agreement. In order to ensure the legitimate trade and sustainable development of the global economy. The Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement aims to reduce copyright and trademark piracy in order to protect intellectual property rights and to protect legitimate trade and the sustainable development of the world economy, And jointly establish a set of implementation rules for best practices used by the competent authorities. Despite the position of protecting intellectual property rights, the content of the ACTA puts developing countries at a disadvantage. This agreement is aimed mainly at contract products and "copycat" goods that occupy a certain place in the industrial layout of third world countries. The whole process of drafting and negotiating the agreement also excluded most developing countries, almost in a secret state, and did not invite representatives of developing countries to participate in the negotiations. Up to now, the developed and developing countries are still arguing over the proposals for strengthening the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. The trips Agreement has created a high starting point for the formation of the international intellectual property competition pattern. But as a product of compromise among different interest groups, it also provides a possibility for countries to use policy space under established rules to choose The rational intellectual property development path suitable for its own economic and industrial development mode. After China's entry into WTO, the measures of intellectual property protection are gradually in line with international standards, and its own intellectual property legal system and law enforcement rules have been established. However, as a developing country, the infringement of intellectual property rights in China and its penetration in international trade is still an indefatigable topic for many countries with vested interests in intellectual property rights. China's development should not only protect intellectual property rights, but also consider its own interests in the intellectual property protection system established in developed countries. While doing its best to fulfill its international obligations, to show its image as a big country and to improve its international status, China, based on the current situation and policy basis of its domestic industrial economy, has exhausted the flexible space in the rules of international intellectual property protection. Timely readjusting domestic laws and related policies, focusing on the appropriate and reasonable protection of intellectual property rights, adopting positive response policies to safeguard the country's realistic interests and promoting the sound and sustainable development of the economy with socialist characteristics, Under the established economic order our country formulates the knowledge Rational choice of property right policy. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter describes the development background of the international protection of intellectual property rights and the birth process of ACTA. The second chapter reviews the content of ACTA. Through the comparison with the relevant articles of TRIPS agreement, this paper expounds the different characteristics of ACTA in the aspect of intellectual property protection system. The third chapter is the impact of ACTA on the development of intellectual property rights protection system, and the fourth chapter is about the impact of ACTA on China and the possible measures to deal with the impact of ACTA on the development of intellectual property protection system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1;F744;F204

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 程文婷;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》與我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法比較芻議[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

本文編號：1939969