本文選題：獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐 + 欺詐例外原則　； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前國際經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易往來中,獨(dú)立擔(dān)保作為一種新型的擔(dān)保方式被廣泛運(yùn)用,促進(jìn)了國際貿(mào)易的發(fā)展。但因獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度固有的獨(dú)立性特征,獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐案件層出不窮,不僅僅影響了獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度進(jìn)一步的發(fā)展完善,而且破壞了國際經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易的正常秩序。獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐產(chǎn)生的原因是多方面的,根本原因在于獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度的獨(dú)立性特征,外部原因在于各國對于獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度欺詐認(rèn)定存在差異,為了從根本上抑制獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐的發(fā)生,平衡交易雙方的利益,各國在建立獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度的同時(shí)承認(rèn)獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐例外原則,允許法院簽發(fā)止付令的形式實(shí)現(xiàn)對欺詐受害者的救濟(jì)。但如果隨意擴(kuò)大欺詐的概念,必將影響?yīng)毩?dān)保正常功能的發(fā)揮,因此衡量獨(dú)立擔(dān)保獨(dú)立性原則和欺詐例外原則具有重大的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。欺詐例外原則的法理基礎(chǔ)包括誠實(shí)信用原則、公平原則及公共秩序保留原則,欺詐例外原則實(shí)現(xiàn)的手段主要包括擔(dān)保人拒付和法院禁令。 在我國對外經(jīng)濟(jì)交往中,獨(dú)立擔(dān)保必將越來越多地被應(yīng)用,但國內(nèi)關(guān)于獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐的研究還處于起步階段,我國獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐存在較多問題,主要在于我國沒有獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐的立法及相關(guān)的司法解釋,造成在司法實(shí)踐中無法可依的局面。本文通過研究西方主要國家和《聯(lián)合國獨(dú)立擔(dān)保與備用信用證公約》對獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐制度的規(guī)定,反思我國對獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐的立法現(xiàn)狀,進(jìn)而從實(shí)體法和程序法兩方面提出完善我國獨(dú)立擔(dān)保欺詐例外制度的建議,以完善獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度,促進(jìn)我國國際貿(mào)易的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:At present, as a new type of guarantee, independent guarantee is widely used in international trade, which promotes the development of international trade. However, due to the inherent independence characteristics of the independent guarantee system, independent guarantee fraud cases emerge in endlessly, which not only affects the further development and perfection of the independent guarantee system, but also destroys the normal order of international economic and trade. There are many reasons for independent guarantee fraud, the fundamental reason lies in the independence characteristics of independent guarantee system, and the external reason is that there are differences in the identification of fraud in independent guarantee system. In order to fundamentally restrain the occurrence of independent guarantee fraud and balance the interests of both parties to the transaction, States recognize the exception principle of independent security fraud while establishing independent security system. Allow the court to grant relief to victims of fraud in the form of stop-payments orders. However, if the concept of fraud is expanded at will, it will affect the normal function of independent guarantee. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to measure the principle of independence of independent guarantee and the principle of fraud exception. The legal basis of the principle of fraud exception includes the principle of good faith, the principle of fairness and the principle of keeping public order. The means of realizing the principle of exception of fraud mainly include the refusal of guarantor to pay and the injunction of court. In China's foreign economic exchanges, independent guarantee will be used more and more, but the domestic research on independent guarantee fraud is still in its infancy, and there are many problems in China's independent guarantee fraud. The main reason lies in the fact that there is no independent guarantee fraud legislation and related judicial interpretation in our country, which makes it impossible to follow in judicial practice. By studying the provisions of the independent guarantee fraud system in the main western countries and the United Nations Convention on Independent guarantees and Stand-by Letters of Credit, this paper reflects on the current legislative situation of independent guarantee fraud in China. Then it puts forward some suggestions from substantive law and procedural law to perfect the exception system of independent guarantee fraud in order to perfect the independent guarantee system and promote the development of China's international trade.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 吳婷;獨(dú)立保證欺詐例外法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1888269