本文選題：CAFTA + 全球保障措施��； 參考：《西南政法大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：為了順應時代的潮流，中國積極尋求區(qū)域經(jīng)濟合作，CAFTA便是在這一背景下產(chǎn)生的，它是世界上第一個基本由發(fā)展中國家組成的自由貿(mào)易區(qū)，也是中國區(qū)域合作中發(fā)展最快且最有成就的。保障措施是各國家保護其國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)利益的一種重要手段，在國際貿(mào)易與區(qū)域貿(mào)易中，，可以促進各成員國很好地處理貿(mào)易自由化與本國產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的矛盾問題。CAFTA的保障措施制度是在WTO保障措施制度的基礎上，根據(jù)CAFTA區(qū)域內(nèi)的具體實踐，針對區(qū)域內(nèi)WTO成員與非WTO成員制定的有針對性的保障措施制度。 本文主要通過剖析CAFTA區(qū)域內(nèi)簽訂的各項協(xié)定中所涉及的保障措施條款，并對比WTO與NAFTA區(qū)域內(nèi)的相關協(xié)定，指出目前CAFTA保障措施制度存在的問題，在此基礎上，提出中國將來在制定各區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定中保障措施制度方面的完善建議。本文主要由引言和正文構(gòu)成： 引言部分，通過介紹CAFTA區(qū)域內(nèi)經(jīng)濟以及其制度發(fā)展的情況，論述CAFTA保障措施制度存在的必要性與現(xiàn)實性，以及本文研究CAFTA保障措施的理論意義與實踐意義，最后介紹了本文的研究方法。 第一部分闡述了CAFTA保障措施的界定、立法依據(jù)和采取的模式。通過分析保障措施的理論定義，根據(jù)CAFTA保障措施制定的相關法律依據(jù)，對CAFTA保障制度進行分類與界定，通過總結(jié)區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排中保障措施采取的模式，并借鑒NAFTA的規(guī)定，提出了CAFTA保障措施的模式。 第二部分重點分析了CAFTA關于貨物貿(mào)易的全球保障措施。CAFTA貨物貿(mào)易全球保障措施的適用對象是CAFTA區(qū)域內(nèi)作為WTO成員方的CAFTA締約國的措施，實施的依據(jù)是GATT1994第19條與WTO保障措施協(xié)定。關于CAFTA全球保障措施的內(nèi)容，主要包括實施條件、實施程序與具體的實施，從而提出了CAFTA全球保障措施存在的問題，以及濫用全球保障措施的救濟手段。 第三部分重點分析了CAFTA關于貨物貿(mào)易的雙邊保障措施。CAFTA雙邊保障措施的法律依據(jù)是CAFTA貨物貿(mào)易協(xié)議的保障措施條款，這一保障措施制度是通過與CAFTA全球保障措施進行比較，制定的具有CAFTA區(qū)域特色的雙邊保障制度，內(nèi)容包括其實施條件與程序等。在論述雙邊保障措施時，與NAFTA的規(guī)定進行比較，指出其中存在的問題并提出了完善措施。針對濫用雙邊保障措施的情況，總結(jié)了CAFTA可采取的救濟手段，并針對區(qū)域內(nèi)的情況，指出了不足并提出完善建議。 第四部分重點分析了CAFTA服務貿(mào)易的緊急保障措施。針對GATS的具體實際，以及目前服務貿(mào)易緊急保障措施多邊談判的情況，制定了CAFTA服務貿(mào)易保障措施制度，主要體現(xiàn)在CAFTA服務貿(mào)易協(xié)議的保障措施條款中，提出了如何適用GATS談判結(jié)果的問題，并規(guī)定了在GATS多邊談判完成之前，CAFTA區(qū)域內(nèi)臨時性保障措施的內(nèi)容。
[Abstract]:In order to conform to the trend of the times, China has been actively seeking regional economic cooperation. CAFTA came into being under this background. It is the first free trade area in the world that is basically composed of developing countries. It is also the fastest growing and most successful regional cooperation in China. Safeguards are an important means by which countries protect the interests of their domestic industries, in international and regional trade, The safeguard measures system of WTO is based on the system of WTO safeguard measures, according to the specific practice in the CAFTA region. Aiming at the WTO member and non-WTO member in the region, the corresponding safeguard system is established. By analyzing the safeguards clauses in the agreements signed in the CAFTA region, and comparing the relevant agreements between WTO and NAFTA, this paper points out the problems existing in the current CAFTA safeguards system, on the basis of which, Some suggestions on how to improve the system of safeguard measures in regional trade agreements in the future are put forward. This paper is mainly composed of introduction and text: In the introduction part, by introducing the economy in CAFTA area and the development of its system, the necessity and reality of the existence of CAFTA safeguard measure system are discussed, and the theoretical and practical significance of the study of CAFTA safeguard measure is also discussed in this paper. Finally, the research method of this paper is introduced. The first part expounds the definition, legislative basis and mode of CAFTA safeguard measures. By analyzing the theoretical definition of safeguard measures, according to the relevant legal basis of CAFTA safeguard measures, this paper classifies and defines the safeguard system of CAFTA, summarizes the models adopted by safeguard measures in regional trade arrangements, and draws lessons from the provisions of NAFTA. The mode of CAFTA safeguard measures is put forward. The second part focuses on the analysis of CAFTA's global safeguard measures on the trade of goods. The objects of the application of the global safeguard measures of CAFTA trade in goods are the measures of the CAFTA Contracting States that are members of WTO in the CAFTA region. Implementation is based on Article 19 of the GATT1994 and the WTO safeguards Agreement. The content of the CAFTA global safeguard measures mainly includes the implementation condition, the implementation procedure and the concrete implementation, thus proposed the CAFTA global safeguard measure existence question, as well as the abuse global safeguard measure relief method. The third part focuses on the analysis of the CAFTA bilateral safeguard measures on goods trade. The legal basis of the bilateral safeguard measures of the CAFTA is the safeguard provisions of the CAFTA Agreement on Trade in goods. This safeguard system is compared with the global safeguard measures of the CAFTA. The bilateral safeguard system with CAFTA regional characteristics, including its implementation conditions and procedures. In this paper, the author compares the bilateral safeguard measures with the provisions of NAFTA, points out the existing problems and puts forward some perfect measures. In view of the abuse of bilateral safeguard measures, this paper summarizes the relief measures that CAFTA can take, and points out the deficiencies and puts forward some suggestions for perfection in view of the situation in the region. The fourth part analyzes the emergency safeguard measures of CAFTA service trade. In view of the concrete reality of GATS and the current multilateral negotiation of emergency safeguard measures in service trade, this paper formulates the safeguard measures system of CAFTA services trade, which is mainly embodied in the safeguard measures clause of CAFTA services trade agreement. This paper puts forward the question of how to apply the GATS negotiation result, and sets out the content of the temporary safeguard measures in the GATS region before the multilateral negotiation is completed.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊麗艷;;試論中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機制[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年04期

2 申琳;簡析WTO《保障措施協(xié)議》救濟措施的缺陷[J];安陽師范學院學報;2004年03期

3 王超;;ACFTA貨物貿(mào)易協(xié)議之保障措施條款研究[J];重慶工商大學學報.西部論壇;2006年05期

4 郭曉剛;;WTO與NAFTA爭端解決機制的比較[J];山西大同大學學報(社會科學版);2010年03期

5 史曉麗;;中國與東盟自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定貿(mào)易救濟法律制度探析[J];法學雜志;2009年01期

6 陸春霞;;完善CAFTA爭端解決機制的建議[J];廣西教育學院學報;2011年02期

7 張軍平;從美國啟動201條款看入世后的保障措施[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2002年04期

8 余瑩;保障措施因果關系標準比較研究[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2004年05期

9 ;《中國-東盟全面經(jīng)濟合作框架協(xié)議》簡介[J];當代廣西;2009年21期

10 高維新;;論中國FTA貿(mào)易救濟權(quán)制度之構(gòu)建[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務;2009年08期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 史曉麗;北美自由貿(mào)易區(qū)貿(mào)易救濟法律制度研究[D];中國政法大學;2007年

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 林嵐劍;中國對東盟出口的影響因素研究[D];云南財經(jīng)大學;2011年

2 羅津;自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定中的貿(mào)易救濟問題研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2006年

3 林欣宇;區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排成員實施保障措施問題研究[D];廈門大學;2007年

本文編號：1885310