本文選題：清潔能源 + 補貼��； 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著化石能源逐日用竭,清潔能源已經(jīng)成為各國重點扶持的新興產(chǎn)業(yè)。但是,清潔能源產(chǎn)業(yè)作為一項新興產(chǎn)業(yè),生產(chǎn)成本巨大,必須依靠政府的支持才能順利地發(fā)展。因此各國政府都給予清潔能源產(chǎn)業(yè)以各種形式的資金支持。而這種資金支持很有可能被認定為是政府給予的補貼,從而被認定違反了世界貿(mào)易組織(WTO)的規(guī)則。 本文分為四章。第一章簡單介紹了化石能源以及清潔能源的概念以及種類,之后介紹了各國發(fā)展清潔能源產(chǎn)業(yè)的緣由,并簡略介紹了部分國家現(xiàn)行有效的對清潔能源的補貼措施。第二章從對法條和既往案例的分析入手,重點介紹了WTO規(guī)則下的反補貼規(guī)定,即《補貼與反補貼措施協(xié)定》(《SCM協(xié)定》),梳理了《SCM協(xié)定》下對補貼各要件的定義以及既往案例中的認定方式,重點分析了“專項性”以及“禁止類補貼”的定義。繼而作為對比,簡要介紹了美國反補貼規(guī)定與實踐,特別是涉及中國的實踐。第三章基于美國鋼鐵工人聯(lián)合會(USW)針對中國清潔能源產(chǎn)業(yè)提出的申訴報告以及美國政府隨后提出的WTO磋商請求,首先簡述了美國301調(diào)查制度,并就301調(diào)查與WTO磋商之間的聯(lián)系簡述了對USW申訴報告進行分析的必要性,隨后對USW報告中涉及補貼措施的部分進行了細致的分析,并列舉了部分在報告中所涉及的中國的法律法規(guī)。第四章有針對性地詳細列舉并分析了中國清潔能源產(chǎn)業(yè)的現(xiàn)行補貼措施,并聯(lián)系USW申訴報告從禁止性補貼以及可訴性補貼兩方面進行了評析,嘗試以WTO合規(guī)性的角度對所涉及的法律法規(guī)的合規(guī)性進行了評價,隨后以《SCM協(xié)定》為基礎(chǔ),提出了部分理論上的解決方案,以期對問題的解決進行有限的嘗試。 本文試圖將WTO規(guī)則與USW申訴報告進行理論與實踐上的結(jié)合,從而一窺清潔能源產(chǎn)業(yè)的補貼現(xiàn)狀,并提出可能的解決方案以期達到拋磚引玉的效果。
[Abstract]:With the daily use of fossil energy, clean energy has become a key support of emerging industries. However, clean energy industry as a new industry, production costs are huge, must rely on the support of the government to develop smoothly. Therefore, governments all over the world give clean energy industry various forms of financial support. Such financial support is likely to be recognized as a subsidy from the government, thus violating World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter briefly introduces the concept and types of fossil energy and clean energy, then introduces the reasons of developing clean energy industry in various countries, and briefly introduces the effective subsidy measures for clean energy in some countries. The second chapter starts with the analysis of the law and past cases, and introduces the countervailing provisions under the WTO rules. That is, the Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures (SCM Agreement), which combs the definition of various elements of subsidy under the Agreement of SCM and the ways of confirming it in previous cases, and focuses on the analysis of the definitions of "specificity" and "prohibited subsidy". Then, as a contrast, the article briefly introduces the anti-subsidy regulations and practice in the United States, especially the practice involving China. The third chapter is based on the complaint report made by the American Iron and Steel Workers Union (USW) against China's clean energy industry and the WTO consultation request made by the US government. The necessity of analyzing the USW complaint report is briefly described on the basis of the connection between the 301 investigation and the WTO consultation, and then the detailed analysis of the part of the USW report concerning the subsidy measures is carried out. Some of the Chinese laws and regulations involved in the report are also listed. The fourth chapter enumerates and analyzes the current subsidy measures in China's clean energy industry in detail, and analyzes the two aspects of prohibited subsidies and actionable subsidies in connection with the USW complaint report. This paper attempts to evaluate the compliance of the laws and regulations involved from the point of view of WTO compliance, and then, based on the SCM Agreement, puts forward some theoretical solutions in order to make a limited attempt to solve the problem. This paper attempts to combine the WTO rules with the USW complaint report in theory and practice in order to get a glimpse of the current situation of subsidies in the clean energy industry and to put forward possible solutions in order to achieve the effect of giving a brick to the jade.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1;D996.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王玉萍;趙媛;;世界風(fēng)電政策分析及對我國風(fēng)電政策的建議[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2008年01期

2 祁歡;WTO與多邊環(huán)境協(xié)議(MEAs)關(guān)系中的條約法問題[J];北京工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

3 高曉露;淺議PPMs在WTO框架內(nèi)的法律地位[J];當代法學(xué);2003年12期

4 李壽平;;WTO框架下的環(huán)境標志問題與我國環(huán)境標志制度的完善[J];當代法學(xué);2007年02期

5 都亳;;PPMs標準研究[J];當代法學(xué);2007年04期

6 毛杰;鄒日強;;SCM協(xié)議中“某些企業(yè)”的法律界定與解釋——兼評美國對華反補貼調(diào)查中專向性認定方面的若干爭議點[J];法學(xué);2010年04期

7 趙越;趙振鐸;;環(huán)境補貼不合理方面的探討[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下半月);2008年06期

8 楊風(fēng)娥;;我國環(huán)境標志的法律制度完善[J];法制與社會;2007年12期

9 王睿麟;;淺談中國環(huán)境法與WTO規(guī)則的接軌[J];法制與社會;2008年27期

10 姜雙林;;歐盟農(nóng)業(yè)環(huán)境補貼法律制度的嬗變及其對中國的啟示[J];法治研究;2008年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李本;WTO框架下的補貼與反補貼協(xié)定研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉紅俠;多邊貿(mào)易體制下與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的環(huán)境措施研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1881430