本文選題：東海大陸架 + 劃界原則�。� 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：東海大陸架下蘊(yùn)藏大量的油氣資源被譽(yù)為第二中東1,這在一定程度引發(fā)了中日之間對(duì)大陸架權(quán)益的爭(zhēng)奪�！堵�(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》第八十三條“海岸相向或相鄰國(guó)家間大陸架界限的劃定”雖然對(duì)劃界問(wèn)題所應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循的國(guó)際法淵源(即第一款所指《國(guó)際法院規(guī)約》第三十八條)、國(guó)際法程序(即第二款所指《海洋法公約》第十五部分)做出了相關(guān)規(guī)定,但是對(duì)于如何進(jìn)行具體劃界并沒(méi)有給出實(shí)質(zhì)性的指導(dǎo)意見(jiàn),因而具體的劃界規(guī)則仍然需要國(guó)家間通過(guò)談判方式解決。這就導(dǎo)致中日之間東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)議遲遲未能得到解決,成為中日關(guān)系出現(xiàn)摩擦的導(dǎo)火索之一。如何妥善地在國(guó)際法框架內(nèi)解決中日兩國(guó)大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)端,需要進(jìn)一步研究。本文以中日東海大陸架劃界的國(guó)際法分析為研究主題,主要對(duì)中日東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)議的緣起、成因、國(guó)際法規(guī)定以及兩國(guó)各自的主張展開(kāi)分析,結(jié)合最新的國(guó)際法判例對(duì)中日東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)議解決的對(duì)策與前景展開(kāi)了探究。 本文分為序言和三章。序言主要探討了本課題的研究背景、研究現(xiàn)狀以及研究方法、內(nèi)容與創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。第一章是中日東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)端的基本背景,主要分析了大陸架的自然概念與法律概念,認(rèn)為中日大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)議的根源是兩國(guó)對(duì)油氣資源和戰(zhàn)略利益的爭(zhēng)奪。第二章是中日東海大陸架劃界的分歧與依據(jù)分析,主要分析了大陸架劃界的國(guó)際法規(guī)定以及中日兩國(guó)各自的大陸架劃界方案,同時(shí)還分析了最新的國(guó)際法判例及其可能產(chǎn)生的指導(dǎo)意義；第三章是中日東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)議之解決對(duì)策探討,主要分析了中日東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)議解決的協(xié)商解決、擱置爭(zhēng)議共同開(kāi)發(fā)以及其他相關(guān)途徑的可能性。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文對(duì)如何解決中日大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)端提出了相關(guān)建議。最后是全文的簡(jiǎn)短結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:The East China Sea continental shelf contains a large amount of oil and gas resources known as the second East China 1, which to a certain extent has triggered a competition between China and Japan for the rights and interests of the continental shelf. Article 83 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea "countries with opposite or adjacent coasts Delineation of the limits of the Continental Shelf "although the sources of international law to be followed with regard to delimitation (i.e. article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice referred to in paragraph 1), international law procedures (i.e., the Convention on the Law of the Sea within the meaning of paragraph 2)" (5) the relevant provisions are made, However, there is no substantive guidance on how to carry out specific demarcation, so the specific delimitation rules still need to be settled by negotiation between States. As a result, the dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf of the East China Sea between China and Japan has been delayed and become one of the fuses of friction between China and Japan. How to properly resolve the continental shelf delimitation dispute between China and Japan within the framework of international law needs further study. Based on the international law analysis of the delimitation of the continental shelf of the East China Sea between China and Japan, this paper mainly analyzes the origin, causes, provisions of international law and the respective claims of the two countries in the delimitation of the continental shelf of the East China Sea. The countermeasures and prospects for the settlement of the continental shelf delimitation dispute between China and Japan in the East China Sea are explored in the light of the latest international law jurisprudence. This article is divided into preface and three chapters. The preface mainly discusses the research background, research status, research methods, content and innovation of this subject. The first chapter is the basic background of the continental shelf delimitation dispute between China and Japan in the East China Sea. It mainly analyzes the natural and legal concepts of the continental shelf, and points out that the origin of the dispute between China and Japan is the scramble for oil and gas resources and strategic interests between the two countries. The second chapter is the analysis of the differences and basis of the delimitation of the continental shelf in the East China Sea. It mainly analyzes the international law provisions of the delimitation of the continental shelf and the respective continental shelf delimitation plans of China and Japan. At the same time, it also analyzes the latest international law jurisprudence and its possible guiding significance. Chapter three is the discussion on the settlement of the dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf of the East China Sea, mainly the negotiation of the settlement of the dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf of the East China Sea. Shelve the possibility of controversial co-development and other related approaches. On the basis of this, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to resolve the continental shelf delimitation dispute between China and Japan. Finally, a brief conclusion of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D993.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 游博;;透析中日油氣資源及東海大陸架劃分之爭(zhēng)問(wèn)題[J];長(zhǎng)白學(xué)刊;2006年01期

2 金永明;;日本的海洋立法新動(dòng)向及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];法學(xué);2007年05期

3 梁詠;;從國(guó)際法視角看中日東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)端[J];法學(xué);2006年08期

4 朱鳳嵐;;“自然延伸”還是“中間線(xiàn)”原則——國(guó)際法框架下透視中日東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)端[J];國(guó)際問(wèn)題研究;2006年05期

5 李廣義;東海大陸架劃界爭(zhēng)端國(guó)際法依據(jù)辨證[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年03期

6 袁斌;試論中日東海大陸架劃界問(wèn)題[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

7 龐中鵬;;試析中日東海能源之爭(zhēng)[J];吉林廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李濤;論大陸架劃界的法律制度[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1870657