本文選題：國(guó)際刑法 + 正犯��； 參考：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為國(guó)際刑法研究對(duì)象的國(guó)際犯罪,通常是組織嚴(yán)密、體系健全、參與者眾的。由于國(guó)際犯罪的有組織性,在犯罪中起到幕后決定作用的主要責(zé)任人經(jīng)常是處于組織體頂端的軍事長(zhǎng)官。研究作為正犯和共犯的軍事長(zhǎng)官刑事責(zé)任,不僅可以使軍事長(zhǎng)官的各種罪行得到追訴,同時(shí)梳理了共犯的參與形態(tài)問題,也促進(jìn)了我國(guó)共犯理論的發(fā)展,以期為我國(guó)刑事法律體系的完善做出貢獻(xiàn)。在研究軍事長(zhǎng)官在國(guó)際犯罪中所應(yīng)承擔(dān)的責(zé)任之前,首先對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外刑法學(xué)界對(duì)于共犯體系的學(xué)說進(jìn)行了學(xué)理溯源,將德國(guó)學(xué)者Roxin的犯罪事實(shí)支配理論作為研究的起點(diǎn),確定以符合國(guó)際潮流的正犯共犯二元區(qū)分制責(zé)任模式作為分析軍事長(zhǎng)官責(zé)任的前提,共犯參與形態(tài)劃分為正犯模式與共犯模式。其次,結(jié)合國(guó)際刑事法院《羅馬規(guī)約》中對(duì)正犯與共犯的分類以及國(guó)際刑事司法審判實(shí)踐來分析軍事長(zhǎng)官作為各種角色所應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)的責(zé)任,包括作為直接正犯、間接正犯以及共同正犯的正犯責(zé)任,和作為教唆犯、幫助犯與支助犯的共犯責(zé)任,還討論了具有特殊性的即共犯正犯化的軍事長(zhǎng)官責(zé)任。最后,通過對(duì)以上內(nèi)容的分析總結(jié),借鑒德國(guó)和國(guó)際上關(guān)于共同犯罪理論的學(xué)理與立法,來探討我國(guó)刑法對(duì)二元區(qū)分模式的接納程度與引入可能性,以期為我國(guó)刑事法律體系中共犯體系的完善帶來一些啟示,并對(duì)如黑社會(huì)性質(zhì)的組織犯罪提供一個(gè)可行的歸責(zé)模式。將國(guó)際刑事立法與軍事長(zhǎng)官的各項(xiàng)刑事責(zé)任緊密聯(lián)系,對(duì)共同犯罪的參與形態(tài)進(jìn)行深入淺出的分析。通過視察我國(guó)是否有正犯共犯二元區(qū)分模式成長(zhǎng)的土壤,發(fā)現(xiàn)這種共犯參與形態(tài)與我國(guó)刑事法律體系有較好的契合度,如果引入這一模式對(duì)解決諸如黑社會(huì)性質(zhì)的組織犯罪等刑法問題有戰(zhàn)略性意義。
[Abstract]:As the object of international criminal law research, international crime is usually well-organized, sound system and numerous participants. Because of the organized nature of international crime, the chief responsible person who plays a decisive role in the crime is often the military commander at the top of the organization. The study of the criminal responsibility of military officers as principal and accomplices can not only lead to the prosecution of all kinds of crimes committed by military officers, but also comb the participation pattern of accomplices and promote the development of the theory of accomplices in our country. In order to contribute to the perfection of our criminal law system. Before studying the responsibility of military officers in international crimes, this paper firstly traces the theoretical origin of the theory of accomplice system in domestic and foreign criminal law circles, taking the theory of criminal fact domination of German scholar Roxin as the starting point of the research. It is determined that the dualistic differentiated liability model of accomplice in accordance with the international trend is the premise of the analysis of the responsibility of military officers, and the pattern of accomplice participation is divided into the pattern of principal offender and the mode of accomplice. Secondly, in the light of the classification of principal and accomplices in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the practice of international criminal justice, the responsibilities of military officers as various actors, including direct perpetrators, are analyzed. The responsibility of indirect principal offender and joint principal offender, and the accomplice responsibility of aiding and supporting crime as abettor, and the responsibility of military chief with particularity of accomplice principal offender are also discussed. Finally, through the analysis and summary of the above contents, draw lessons from the theory of joint crime in Germany and the international academic theory and legislation, to explore the degree of acceptance and the possibility of introduction of dual differentiation model in criminal law of our country. In order to bring some enlightenment to the perfection of the accomplice system in the criminal law system of our country, and provide a feasible imputation mode for the organized crime such as the underworld. The international criminal legislation is closely linked with the criminal responsibility of military officers, and the participating form of joint crime is analyzed. By inspecting the soil of whether there is a dual differentiation model of principal offender accomplice in our country, it is found that this pattern of accomplice participation has a good agreement with the criminal law system of our country. If this model is introduced, it is of strategic significance to solve criminal law problems such as organized crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D997.9
，

本文編號(hào)：1865149