本文選題：版權(quán)平行進(jìn)口 + 權(quán)利用盡原則��； 參考：《寧波大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著版權(quán)商品的平行進(jìn)口在國(guó)際貿(mào)易環(huán)境中發(fā)生的頻率越來(lái)越多,各國(guó)都在逐步完善對(duì)其法律規(guī)制的手段。各國(guó)根據(jù)經(jīng)濟(jì)的根本利益決定是否對(duì)版權(quán)平行進(jìn)口進(jìn)行禁止,即實(shí)現(xiàn)各自經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的最大化是其取舍的基礎(chǔ)。鑒于平行進(jìn)口并不是單純的學(xué)理性問(wèn)題,而是一個(gè)需要各國(guó)立法者依據(jù)各自利益進(jìn)行考慮和權(quán)衡的問(wèn)題。對(duì)平行進(jìn)口的立法態(tài)度與各國(guó)所一貫實(shí)施的國(guó)際貿(mào)易政策之間有著萬(wàn)分密切的關(guān)系。在削減消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買(mǎi)成本和促進(jìn)版權(quán)商品流通方面,平行進(jìn)口顯然起到不可替代的作用。 各國(guó)在二戰(zhàn)后為提升本國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力,成立WTO以削減各自關(guān)稅和消除各種非關(guān)稅壁壘,以期逐步實(shí)現(xiàn)貨物和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易的自由化。禁止版權(quán)平行進(jìn)口行為必然形成更加頑固的非關(guān)稅貿(mào)易壁壘,也將拖延國(guó)際貿(mào)易通向自由化的時(shí)間。隨著貿(mào)易自由和全球一體化進(jìn)程的加快,各個(gè)國(guó)家也在根據(jù)WTO相關(guān)規(guī)定逐步削減海關(guān)對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)商品的征稅數(shù)數(shù)額,單純依靠關(guān)稅阻止平行進(jìn)口的做法已經(jīng)開(kāi)始飽受詬病。所以,允許平行進(jìn)口與促進(jìn)商品跨國(guó)界自由流動(dòng)的目的相符合,允許版權(quán)平行進(jìn)口將必然是各國(guó)民眾共同的呼聲。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分。首先重點(diǎn)分析版權(quán)平行進(jìn)口在新的貿(mào)易體制和交易環(huán)境下發(fā)生的變化和所產(chǎn)生的新影響。第二部分在分析平行進(jìn)口相關(guān)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,著重對(duì)其合法性問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了探討,尤其回答了平行進(jìn)口商的進(jìn)口行為是否屬于不當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。第三部分選取中國(guó)香港、美國(guó)和相關(guān)國(guó)際條約作為分析對(duì)象,探索分析了國(guó)際社會(huì)中所普遍采取的路徑選擇。第四部分作為本文的重點(diǎn),介紹了我國(guó)的立法實(shí)踐,提出相關(guān)的立法及司法建議。認(rèn)為我國(guó)要堅(jiān)持多部相關(guān)法律共同規(guī)制,又要避免規(guī)范不一和相互沖突的現(xiàn)象發(fā)生。用版權(quán)法和合同法規(guī)范版權(quán)所有人享有的權(quán)利范圍的同時(shí),又要運(yùn)用反不當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法權(quán)衡權(quán)利人或進(jìn)口商在出售版權(quán)商品中所涉及的具體利益,認(rèn)定平行進(jìn)口及出售行為的合法或合理性,在堅(jiān)持契約自由的前提下綜合考慮其與其他相關(guān)法律的價(jià)值沖突。
[Abstract]:With the increasing frequency of parallel import of copyright goods in the international trading environment, various countries are gradually perfecting the means of legal regulation. According to the fundamental interests of the economy, countries decide whether to prohibit the parallel import of copyright, that is, to maximize their economic interests is the basis of their choice. In view of parallel import is not a purely scientific rational problem, but a problem that needs to be considered and weighed according to the respective interests of the legislators of various countries. There is a close relationship between the legislative attitude towards parallel import and the international trade policy that countries have always implemented. Parallel imports play an irreplaceable role in reducing consumer purchase costs and promoting the circulation of copyrighted goods. In order to enhance their economic strength after World War II, various countries set up WTO to reduce their respective tariffs and eliminate various non-tariff barriers, in order to gradually realize the liberalization of trade in goods and intellectual property rights. The prohibition of copyright parallel imports will inevitably result in more stubborn non-tariff barriers to trade and delay the time for international trade to liberalize. With the acceleration of the process of free trade and global integration, countries are gradually reducing the amount of customs tax on intellectual property goods in accordance with the relevant regulations of the WTO, and the practice of relying solely on tariffs to prevent parallel imports has been criticized. Therefore, allowing parallel imports is consistent with the purpose of promoting the free flow of goods across national borders. Allowing copyright parallel imports will inevitably be the common voice of the people of all countries. This paper is divided into four parts. Firstly, this paper analyzes the changes and impacts of parallel import of copyright under the new trading system and trading environment. In the second part, on the basis of analyzing the theory of parallel import, the author probes into the legality of parallel import, especially answers whether the import behavior of parallel importer is improper competition. In the third part, the author chooses Hong Kong, China, the United States and relevant international treaties as the object of analysis, and explores and analyzes the path choices generally adopted in the international community. The fourth part, as the focus of this paper, introduces the legislative practice of our country, and puts forward relevant legislative and judicial suggestions. The author thinks that our country should insist on the common regulation of many relevant laws and avoid the phenomenon of different norms and conflicts. While regulating the scope of rights enjoyed by copyright owners by copyright law and contract law, the use of anti-improper competition law should be used to weigh the specific interests involved in the sale of copyright goods by the holder or importer, To determine the legality or reasonableness of parallel import and sale, and to consider the conflict of value between parallel import and other relevant laws under the premise of upholding the freedom of contract.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陸幸生;袁學(xué)術(shù);顧翔;;《南通家紡市場(chǎng)版權(quán)保護(hù)情況調(diào)研報(bào)告》內(nèi)容概要[J];中國(guó)版權(quán);2010年02期

2 肖虹;;南通經(jīng)驗(yàn) 世界共享——南通家紡產(chǎn)業(yè)版權(quán)保護(hù)調(diào)研報(bào)告在京發(fā)布[J];中國(guó)版權(quán);2010年04期

3 鄒雅菁;;演出產(chǎn)業(yè)中的音樂(lè)版權(quán)保護(hù)[J];藝海;2011年06期

4 鄭曉紅;;楊紅櫻:我的版權(quán)誰(shuí)做主?[J];中國(guó)版權(quán);2010年02期

5 李壽榮;李明山;;《大清著作權(quán)律》出臺(tái)的前前后后[J];中國(guó)版權(quán);2010年05期

6 張麗;;試論平行進(jìn)口的相關(guān)理論及其對(duì)緩解公共健康危機(jī)所起的作用[J];長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

7 沈麗紅;;學(xué)位論文的法律屬性及其利用[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

8 姚頡靖;彭輝;;版權(quán)保護(hù)與軟件業(yè)盜版關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究——基于51個(gè)國(guó)家的數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2011年06期

9 言恭達(dá);;關(guān)于版權(quán)保護(hù)當(dāng)前的形勢(shì)和建議[J];中國(guó)版權(quán);2010年04期

10 彭翊;李方麗;;銀行版權(quán)質(zhì)押風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制探析[J];中國(guó)版權(quán);2010年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 唐麗;;論科學(xué)作品的版權(quán)保護(hù)[A];2002年全國(guó)自然辯證法學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展年會(huì)論文集[C];2002年

2 田震;陳高興;李改肖;王斌;;中國(guó)數(shù)字海圖生產(chǎn)與版權(quán)保護(hù)[A];全國(guó)地圖學(xué)與GIS學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2004年

3 宋玉杰;劉瑞禎;譚鐵牛;;一種用于印刷品防偽的數(shù)字水印技術(shù)[A];中國(guó)圖象圖形學(xué)會(huì)第十屆全國(guó)圖像圖形學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議（CIG’2001）和第一屆全國(guó)虛擬現(xiàn)實(shí)技術(shù)研討會(huì)（CVR’2001）論文集[C];2001年

4 周曉唯;白蕓;;國(guó)際貿(mào)易中版權(quán)平行進(jìn)口的立法取向研究[A];2010年度（第八屆）中國(guó)法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)論壇論文集（下冊(cè)）[C];2010年

5 方英;;科技期刊與版權(quán)保護(hù)[A];科技期刊編輯研究文集（第三集）[C];1994年

6 劉e，

本文編號(hào)：1836334