本文選題：解決投資爭端國際中心 + 仲裁裁決　； 參考：《外交學(xué)院》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：國際投資是當(dāng)代世界各國經(jīng)濟(jì)交往的常見形式,但在實(shí)踐過程中也產(chǎn)生了大量的投資爭議。為了解決外國投資者和東道國之間的投資爭議,“解決投資爭端國際中心”(以下簡稱“ICSID”或“中心”)機(jī)制應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行是ICSID機(jī)制有效性的重要保障,而國家豁免是橫亙在裁決執(zhí)行過程中的最大阻礙。事實(shí)上,實(shí)踐中已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了主權(quán)國家援引國家豁免拒絕執(zhí)行ICSID裁決的案例,但《解決國家和他國國民間投資爭端公約》(以下簡稱《華盛頓公約》或《公約》)現(xiàn)有框架下的解決辦法卻不盡如人意。因此,本文的研究目的即是對ICSID裁決的執(zhí)行機(jī)制進(jìn)行研究,論述私人投資者在面對主權(quán)國家援引國家豁免拒絕執(zhí)行ICSID裁決時該如何保護(hù)自己的權(quán)益。同時,鑒于我國與ICSID的聯(lián)系日益密切,ICSID裁決如何在我國承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行也是本文重點(diǎn)研究的內(nèi)容。通過以上研究,筆者認(rèn)為:國家豁免的存在的確對ICSID裁決的執(zhí)行構(gòu)成了一定的威脅。但從現(xiàn)實(shí)層面上講,對ICSID執(zhí)行制度進(jìn)行完善具有很大的難度,私人投資者在與主權(quán)國家進(jìn)行談判時又多處于劣勢地位,所以在國家層面上保護(hù)本國投資者和海外財產(chǎn)就顯得尤為重要。因此,我國不宜一再堅(jiān)持絕對豁免立場,應(yīng)該加強(qiáng)對限制豁免的研究并積極立法,主動成為推動國際法發(fā)展的先驅(qū),而不是一味被動地應(yīng)對國際社會中的各種挑戰(zhàn)。
[Abstract]:International investment is a common form of economic exchanges in the contemporary world, but a large number of investment disputes arise in the process of practice. In order to solve the investment disputes between foreign investors and host countries, the "International Center for the settlement of Investment disputes" (hereinafter referred to as "ICSID" or "Center") came into being. The recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards is an important guarantee for the effectiveness of the ICSID mechanism, and the state immunity is the biggest obstacle in the enforcement of the award. In fact, in practice, there have been cases in which sovereign states have invoked State immunity to refuse to enforce ICSID rulings. However, the existing framework of the Convention on the settlement of Private Investment disputes between States and other countries (hereinafter referred to as the Washington Convention or the Convention) is not satisfactory. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to study the enforcement mechanism of ICSID adjudication, and to discuss how private investors should protect their rights and interests when the sovereign state invokes the immunity of the state to refuse to execute the ICSID award. At the same time, in view of the increasingly close relationship between China and ICSID, how to recognize and enforce the ICSID decision in China is also the focus of this paper. Through the above research, the author thinks that the existence of state immunity does pose a certain threat to the enforcement of ICSID ruling. However, from a practical point of view, it is very difficult to improve the implementation system of ICSID, and private investors are often at a disadvantage when negotiating with sovereign states. So it is particularly important to protect domestic investors and overseas property at the national level. Therefore, our country should not insist on the absolute immunity position again and again, should strengthen the research on the restricted immunity and actively legislate, and become the pioneer of promoting the development of international law, instead of passively facing all kinds of challenges in the international community.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D997.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 萬思怡;楊衛(wèi)東;;淺議ICSID裁決執(zhí)行與國家財產(chǎn)豁免及我國之適用[J];湖北工程學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年04期

2 王佳;;論國家豁免原則對國際投資仲裁裁決執(zhí)行的影響[J];嶺南學(xué)刊;2014年02期

3 楊玲;;國際商事仲裁中的國家豁免[J];法學(xué);2013年02期

4 黃世席;;國際投資仲裁裁決執(zhí)行中的國家豁免問題[J];清華法學(xué);2012年06期

5 喬慧娟;;試析中國簽訂BIT中的東道國與投資者爭端解決條款[J];商業(yè)時代;2012年05期

6 肖芳;;國際投資仲裁裁決在中國的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[J];法學(xué)家;2011年06期

7 楊玲;;歐洲的國家豁免立法與實(shí)踐——兼及對中國相關(guān)立場與實(shí)踐的反思[J];歐洲研究;2011年05期

8 陳輝萍;;ICSID仲裁裁決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行機(jī)制的實(shí)踐檢視及其對中國的啟示[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2011年02期

9 張瀟劍;;論ICSID仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

10 夏康森;;國際經(jīng)濟(jì)制裁與國際法[J];法學(xué)雜志;1984年05期

，

本文編號：1797740