本文選題：貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查 + 法律制度��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查法律制度是指一國(guó)政府授權(quán)的對(duì)外貿(mào)易主管機(jī)關(guān)根據(jù)申請(qǐng)或者依職權(quán)主動(dòng)對(duì)外國(guó)(地區(qū))政府所實(shí)施的或者支持實(shí)施的構(gòu)成貿(mào)易壁壘的措施進(jìn)行調(diào)查,并根據(jù)調(diào)查結(jié)果采取相應(yīng)救濟(jì)性措施的各類行政法律規(guī)范的總和。它同時(shí)兼具單邊性與多邊性,進(jìn)攻性與防衛(wèi)性等特征。該制度最先起源于美國(guó),后在歐盟和我國(guó)都得到了發(fā)展。 然而,隨著新的一輪世界經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)的影響漸漸消退,世界進(jìn)入了一個(gè)被稱之為“后危機(jī)”的時(shí)代。新貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義抬頭,新型的貿(mào)易壁壘層出不窮,在這個(gè)新的時(shí)代背景下,貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查法律制度在世界范圍內(nèi)可以發(fā)揮新的作用。有鑒于此,我國(guó)面臨著貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查立法需要完善的現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況。但是在目前的立法狀況下,貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查法律制度并沒(méi)有比較統(tǒng)一的規(guī)定,因此,貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查立法修訂問(wèn)題的解決建立在對(duì)貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查法律制度發(fā)展趨勢(shì)的分析之上,只有了解了貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查立法的發(fā)展趨勢(shì),才能夠在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)我國(guó)的相關(guān)法律制度進(jìn)行完善和修改,以適應(yīng)不斷發(fā)展的時(shí)代的變化。 我國(guó)自建立貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查制度之初至今,其實(shí)際應(yīng)用的案例很少,其中一個(gè)重要的因素就是我國(guó)的貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查制度立法不夠健全和可操作性比較差。新的時(shí)代背景雖然帶來(lái)了很多挑戰(zhàn),但同時(shí)也蘊(yùn)含著變革的機(jī)遇,修改完善我國(guó)的貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查制度立法應(yīng)當(dāng)抓住這樣一個(gè)時(shí)機(jī)。本文通過(guò)對(duì)美歐貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查法律制度的比較,對(duì)貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查法律制度的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)進(jìn)行了分析,并在此基礎(chǔ)上,闡述了我國(guó)的貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查立法——《對(duì)外貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查規(guī)則》本身存在的法律障礙,同時(shí)立足本國(guó)實(shí)踐,提出了完善我國(guó)貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查制度的法律建議。
[Abstract]:The legal system for the investigation of trade barriers means that the competent foreign trade authority authorized by the government of a country conducts an investigation on the measures that constitute trade barriers implemented or supported by the foreign (regional) government according to its application or on its own initiative, And according to the results of the investigation to take corresponding relief measures of the sum of all kinds of administrative legal norms. It has the characteristics of unilateral and multilateral, offensive and defensive at the same time. The system originated in the United States, then developed in the European Union and China. However, as the impact of a new round of world economic crisis recedes, the world enters an era known as post-crisis. New trade protectionism rises and new trade barriers emerge in endlessly. Under this new background, the legal system of trade barrier investigation can play a new role in the world. In view of this, our country is faced with the reality that the legislation of trade barrier investigation needs to be perfected. However, under the current legislative situation, there is no uniform regulation in the legal system of trade barrier investigation. Therefore, the solution to the legislative revision of trade barrier investigation is based on the analysis of the development trend of the legal system of trade barrier investigation. Only by understanding the development trend of the legislation of trade barrier investigation can we perfect and modify the relevant legal system of our country on this basis in order to adapt to the changes of the developing times. Since the establishment of the trade barrier investigation system in China, there have been few cases of its practical application. One of the important factors is that the legislation of the trade barrier investigation system in China is not perfect and the operability is relatively poor. Although the new era background has brought many challenges, but also contains the opportunity of change, we should seize such an opportunity to amend and perfect the legislation of our country's trade barrier investigation system. This paper analyzes the development trend of the legal system of trade barrier investigation through the comparison of the legal system of trade barrier investigation between the United States and Europe, and on the basis of it, it analyzes the development trend of the legal system of trade barrier investigation. This paper expounds the legal obstacles existing in the legislation of Trade Barrier investigation in China-"rules of Foreign Trade Barrier investigation" itself, at the same time, based on the domestic practice, puts forward some legal suggestions to perfect the investigation system of China's Trade Barrier.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張琳;;論WTO非關(guān)稅壁壘下中國(guó)相關(guān)法律的整合[J];出國(guó)與就業(yè)(就業(yè)版);2012年04期

2 宋韶穎;;貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查制度性質(zhì)探析[J];研究生法學(xué);2006年01期

3 張曉東;孫一菡;;我國(guó)中藥出口及遭受貿(mào)易壁壘分析[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);2012年02期

4 張桂紅;DSU報(bào)復(fù)條款與美國(guó)301條款的關(guān)系探析——兼論中國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)301條款的對(duì)策[J];法律適用(國(guó)家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年04期

5 史曉麗;;我國(guó)對(duì)外貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查制度實(shí)體規(guī)則研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年07期

6 王粵;韓新毅;;“后危機(jī)時(shí)代”的技術(shù)性貿(mào)易壁壘及應(yīng)對(duì)[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2010年02期

7 韓景華;任維;;后危機(jī)時(shí)代貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義新趨勢(shì)及應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2011年02期

8 鐘慧中;美、歐貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查制度的比較及啟示[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2004年02期

9 汪家磨,蔡從燕;我國(guó)貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查立法:成就與不足[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2004年04期

10 程衛(wèi)東;限定自由裁量權(quán)——中國(guó)貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查程序規(guī)則評(píng)析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2003年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 金瀟磊;美國(guó)“337條款”調(diào)查與執(zhí)行的法律問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

2 白凱;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的發(fā)展與完善[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

3 鐘黎敏;中美貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查制度比較研究[D];中南大學(xué);2011年

4 徐嘉銘;WTO貿(mào)易報(bào)復(fù)機(jī)制研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2011年

5 劉寶童;WTO機(jī)制下的貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義法律問(wèn)題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年

6 胡敏;后危機(jī)時(shí)期歐盟對(duì)華貿(mào)易保護(hù)問(wèn)題研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2011年

7 高武;行政復(fù)議范圍的擴(kuò)充性研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2003年

8 許光磊;歐共體貿(mào)易壁壘規(guī)則（TBR）研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2004年

9 劉巍;美國(guó)貿(mào)易法“301條款”研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2005年

10 倪斐;對(duì)外貿(mào)易壁壘調(diào)查制度比較研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1782876