本文選題：反傾銷 + “可獲得事實”規(guī)則　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以《反傾銷協(xié)定》第6.8條“可獲得事實”規(guī)則為研究對象,主要研究在反傾銷實踐中“可獲得事實”規(guī)則的不當(dāng)使用。通過對“可獲得事實”規(guī)則不當(dāng)使用的表現(xiàn)、后果及原因進(jìn)行分析,提出防止“可獲得事實”規(guī)則被不當(dāng)使用的對策。 全文共分三大部分。第一部分對“可獲得事實”規(guī)則的立法作用及效果進(jìn)行分析。主要介紹了“可獲得事實”規(guī)則的立法目的、“可獲得事實”規(guī)則在一些國家的實施情況、使用“可獲得事實”規(guī)則應(yīng)達(dá)到的效果及可能產(chǎn)生的問題。通過對“可獲得事實”規(guī)則立法目的的分析,我們了解到“可獲得事實”規(guī)則的立法目的應(yīng)為保證調(diào)查機(jī)關(guān)順利完成反傾銷調(diào)查。 第二部分對“可獲得事實”規(guī)則的不當(dāng)使用進(jìn)行分析。首先探討了應(yīng)以何種標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來確定“可獲得事實”規(guī)則是否存在不當(dāng)使用。之后從宏觀及微觀兩個方面對“可獲得事實”規(guī)則是否存在不當(dāng)使用進(jìn)行探討,得出“可獲得事實”規(guī)則存在不當(dāng)使用的結(jié)論。隨后對造成“可獲得事實”規(guī)則被不當(dāng)使用的原因進(jìn)行分析,并分析“可獲得事實”規(guī)則不當(dāng)使用可能造成的負(fù)面效果。 第三部分對“可獲得事實”規(guī)則的不當(dāng)使用從國際法層面及國內(nèi)法層面提出了對策。在國際法層面,具體提出了明確《反傾銷協(xié)定》第6.8條的個別關(guān)鍵用詞的含義。在國內(nèi)法層面,具體提出了增加反傾銷調(diào)查程序透明性及將公共利益原則引入以降低“可獲得事實”規(guī)則被不當(dāng)使用的可能性。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the "accessible facts" rule in Article 6.8 of the Anti-dumping Agreement, and mainly studies the improper use of the "available facts" rule in the practice of anti-dumping.Through the analysis of the expression, consequence and reason of the improper use of the rules of "available facts", the author puts forward some countermeasures to prevent the rules of "available facts" from being improperly used.The paper is divided into three parts.The first part analyzes the legislative function and effect of the "available facts" rule.This paper mainly introduces the legislative purpose of the rules of "available facts", the implementation of the rules of "available facts" in some countries, the effect of using the rules of "available facts" and the problems that may arise.Through the analysis of the legislative purpose of the "available facts" rule, we know that the legislative purpose of the "available facts" rule should be to ensure the smooth completion of the anti-dumping investigation by the investigating organ.The second part analyzes the improper use of the "available facts" rule.First of all, the paper discusses what criteria should be used to determine whether the "available facts" rule has been improperly used.After that, the author discusses whether there is improper use of the rules of "available facts" from the macro and micro aspects, and draws the conclusion that the rules of "available facts" are improperly used.Then it analyzes the causes of the improper use of the rules of "available facts", and analyzes the possible negative effects of the improper use of the rules of "available facts".In the third part, the author puts forward some countermeasures to the improper use of the rule of "available facts" from the aspects of international law and domestic law.At the level of international law, the meaning of individual key words in Article 6.8 of the ADA is specified.At the level of domestic law, it puts forward the possibility of increasing the transparency of anti-dumping investigation procedure and introducing the principle of public interest to reduce the possibility of improper use of the rule of "available facts".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 彭越林;;“可獲得的最佳信息”在反傾銷調(diào)查中的適用性分析[J];法制與社會;2009年05期

，

本文編號：1769576