本文選題：補貼與反補貼措施協定 + 出口補貼　； 參考：《北京理工大學學報(社會科學版)》2010年06期

【摘要】：WTO《補貼與反補貼措施協定》第3.1(a)條規(guī)定,"事實上以預期的出口實績?yōu)闂l件"的出口補貼被列為禁止性補貼。它應滿足兩個要件,即政府補貼的授予"預期"了出口實績并且與出口實績"相掛鉤"。"預期"意味著將來可能有出口實績,但并不一定會發(fā)生。"相掛鉤"意味著如果沒有出口實績,政府就不授予補貼。美國訴歐盟及其成員國影響民用大型飛機貿易措施案中,專家組對此規(guī)則進行了非常寬泛的解釋。此解釋顯然不利于后起的WTO成員方促進民用飛機產業(yè)的發(fā)展。為此,中國應謹慎實施事實上刺激和鼓勵民用飛機的出口補貼,積極推動與完善民用飛機產業(yè)補貼的國際和國內立法。
[Abstract]:Under Article 3.1 ( a ) of the WTO Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures , " in fact , export subsidies that are conditional on the expected export performance " are classified as prohibitive subsidies . It should satisfy the two elements that the grant of government subsidies is " expected " and is linked to the performance of exports . " This means that if there is no export performance , the Group does not grant subsidies . " This interpretation is clearly not conducive to the development of civil aircraft industry by the following WTO Members . In this regard , China should carefully implement international and domestic legislation in effect to stimulate and encourage the export subsidies of civil aircraft , actively promote and improve industrial subsidies for civil aircraft .

【作者單位】： 北京理工大學法學院;
【分類號】：D996.1;D971.2

【共引文獻】

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 王庭東;政策引致性扭曲：開放效益的體制因素[D];上海社會科學院;2007年

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 馮s，

本文編號：1769437