本文選題：自然人流動 + 自由化��； 參考：《華中科技大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：自然人流動是GATS框架的第四種服務貿易方式，烏拉圭回合貿易談判最終確立了其國際法規(guī)則，該規(guī)則的開放性設計在最大限度上取得成員國諒解的同時，也帶來了許多問題。自然人流動規(guī)則創(chuàng)設至今，其自由化水平仍然很低，其主要制約因素是自然人流動的制度缺陷、成員國間的貿易壁壘和成員國國內的政策障礙。 隨著全球一體化進程，自然人流動自由化蘊含的巨大潛在利益已為許多國家所認同，但從GATS談判來看，其自由化進程仍舉步維艱，發(fā)達國家在市場準入和國民待遇問題上普遍持保守態(tài)度，發(fā)展中國家也未能提出足以吸引發(fā)達國家妥協(xié)的談判籌碼，目前態(tài)勢下，GATS框架內的談判短期內不太可能出現(xiàn)樂觀景象。在GATS框架之外，東盟、亞太經(jīng)合組織等區(qū)域經(jīng)濟組織在各自框架內對自然人流動問題積極探索并達成了一些自由化成果；國際勞工組織、國際移民組織等國際組織在國際勞工標準和國際研討會議方面對自然人流動自由化做出了重要貢獻；國家間也通過更加靈活的雙邊協(xié)定方式對自然人流動自由化積極推進。這些探索為推動自然人流動自由化提供了一條更現(xiàn)實的進路。 我國的自然人輸出以勞務外派為主要方式，，輸出人員多是低技術水平服務提供者，集中在勞動密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)；自然人輸入則以高技術水平服務提供者為主，但整體規(guī)模較小。我國自然人流動自由化的主要制約因素為自然人流動的立法缺失、相關制度不完善和嚴格的貿易壁壘。推動我國自然人流動自由化的路徑是：在國際層面，積極參與GATS談判、與區(qū)域貿易組織積極合作、與其他國家積極開展雙邊合作；在國內法層面，完善自然人流動立法機制、優(yōu)化自然人流動管理機制、消除自然人流動壁壘。這兩方面的積極措施可以促進我國自然人流動自由化的深入發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The movement of natural persons is the fourth mode of trade in services in the framework of GATS. The Uruguay Round of trade negotiations has finally established its rules of international law.Up to now, the liberalization level of the rules of movement of natural persons is still very low. The main restrictive factors are the defects of the system of the movement of natural persons, the trade barriers among member countries and the domestic policy obstacles of member countries.With the process of global integration, the huge potential benefits of the liberalization of the movement of natural persons have been recognized by many countries, but from the perspective of GATS negotiations, the liberalization process is still difficult.The developed countries generally hold a conservative attitude on the issues of market access and national treatment, and the developing countries have failed to offer sufficient bargaining chips to attract the developed countries to compromise. Under the current situation, the negotiations within the framework of GATS are unlikely to be optimistic in the short term.Outside the GATS framework, regional economic organizations such as ASEAN and APEC have actively explored and achieved some liberalization results on the issue of the movement of natural persons within their respective frameworks.International organizations such as the International Organization for Migration (IOM) have made important contributions to the liberalization of the movement of natural persons in the field of international labour standards and international conferences, and the liberalization of the movement of natural persons has been actively promoted by means of more flexible bilateral agreements between countries.These explorations provide a more realistic way to liberalize the movement of natural persons.The export of natural persons in our country is mainly in the form of labor service assignment, and the export personnel are mostly low-skilled service providers, concentrated in labor-intensive industries, while the natural person imports are mainly high-tech service providers, but the overall scale is relatively small.The main restrictive factors of the liberalization of the movement of natural persons in China are the lack of legislation on the movement of natural persons, the imperfection of relevant systems and the strict trade barriers.The ways to promote the liberalization of the movement of natural persons in China are: at the international level, actively participate in the GATS negotiations, actively cooperate with the regional trade organizations, and actively carry out bilateral cooperation with other countries; at the level of domestic law, perfect the legislative mechanism of the movement of natural persons.Optimize the management mechanism of the movement of natural persons and eliminate barriers to the movement of natural persons.These two positive measures can promote the further development of the liberalization of the movement of natural persons in China.
【學位授予單位】：華中科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D998.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 汪金蘭;鮑瑋煒;;GATS框架下我國涉外勞務輸出法律制度的完善[J];安徽大學法律評論;2007年02期

2 李伍榮;羅啟發(fā);胡德寶;;GATS框架下自然人流動自由化:發(fā)展中國家觀點[J];安徽商貿職業(yè)技術學院學報(社會科學版);2006年01期

3 蒙英華;;服務貿易中的商業(yè)存在與自然人流動——促進作用還是抑制作用?[J];財貿研究;2009年06期

4 羅穎;;GATS下的自然人移動與我國勞務輸出體制的完善[J];研究生法學;2007年01期

5 李健男;;論中國與新加坡自由貿易協(xié)定對自然人流動制度的突破及其啟示[J];東南亞研究;2010年03期

6 許華蘭;;《服務貿易總協(xié)定》下自然人流動的福利效應分析[J];國際商務.對外經(jīng)濟貿易大學學報;2006年02期

7 馬勇;;外國出入境管理體制概況及啟示[J];法制與社會;2010年07期

8 錢爭鳴;鄧明;;文化距離、制度距離與自然人流動政策的溢出[J];國際貿易問題;2009年10期

9 王鐵山;馮宗憲;;服務貿易中發(fā)達國家對自然人流動的管制:動因、變革與啟示[J];國際貿易;2008年10期

10 何智慧;;我國自然人流動的法律現(xiàn)狀及走向[J];河北法學;2008年04期

本文編號：1762600