本文選題：引渡　切入點：引渡法　出處：《中央民族大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：死刑不引渡是保護人權(quán)的一個重要體現(xiàn),表明了對死刑的限制和反對、對被引渡人生命權(quán)的保護以及國際人道主義精神。死刑不引渡原則是現(xiàn)代引渡制度的產(chǎn)物,是隨著人權(quán)觀念的興起逐步形成和發(fā)展起來的。由于我國特殊的歷史原因和當前經(jīng)濟體制改革的特殊國情,目前還不可能廢除死刑。隨著我國外交政策的不斷完善、對外國際交流的不斷擴大,我國在國際上的大國地位在日益提高,給重刑犯、死刑犯引渡回我國受審帶來了中國與國際間法律合作的廣闊空間。但國際上被普遍認可的引渡制度中死刑不引渡原則往往又是阻礙國際間罪犯引渡順利實現(xiàn)的一個重要因素。因死刑刑種保留國及死刑廢除國之間思想認識、價值觀、人權(quán)觀的不同而更加引起國際法學(xué)界的深度關(guān)注,使之發(fā)展成為發(fā)揮作用較大的引渡原則之一。我國刑法中判處死刑的罪名較多,雖然修改后的我國《刑法》減少了部分罪名的死刑適用條款,并且由最高人民法院收回了死刑復(fù)核權(quán),其目的是降低死刑刑種的適用率,使死刑的適用更加嚴格,更加慎重。但在我國的司法實踐中,每年的死刑判決率仍在世界上居于高位。而我們必須看到,引渡是一種國際間刑事司法協(xié)助制度,它能清晰地反映我國的立法精神,反映我國在人權(quán)保護問題上的基本態(tài)度和國際形象,我國《引渡法》對于此項原則采取了回避的態(tài)度,立法上處于空白狀態(tài)。但為了我國的國際刑事司法協(xié)助順利開展,在我國的《引渡法》中明確規(guī)定“死刑不引渡原則”應(yīng)當是大勢所趨。引渡問題因為司法制度的不同,同時往往涉及到國家政治、經(jīng)濟、外交等方面,因而在一些個案引渡問題上困難重重,這已引起了國際社會的廣泛關(guān)注。在引渡問題上求同存異,加強合作,已成為國際社會的廣泛共識。因此,在實踐中如何運用死刑不引渡原則,更有效的使國內(nèi)法積極、現(xiàn)實的應(yīng)對國際普遍被認可的引渡方面的法律問題是一個值得研究的題目。本文從死刑不引渡原則的概念與產(chǎn)生背景出發(fā),分析了死刑不引渡原則的法理基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合我國引渡活動的立法和司法領(lǐng)域的實踐,探討死刑不引渡原則在我國面臨的困境及應(yīng)對思路。同時,從比較法的角度,考察了死刑不引渡原則的國內(nèi)外理論與實踐,分析了我國引渡制度在該原則上存在的問題,提出了探討建議,希望有利于我國引渡法的完善以及國際刑事司法合作的開展。
[Abstract]:The death penalty is an important manifestation of the protection of human rights, to indicate the limitation of death penalty and against extradition of life and rights protection and international humanitarian spirit. The principle of non extradition of death penalty is a product of modern extradition system, with the rise of the concept of human rights is gradually formed and developed. Because of the special conditions and historical reasons special in China and the current economic system reform, it is impossible to abolish the death penalty. As China's foreign policy of continuous improvement, foreign exchange continues to expand, China's status in the world is increasing, to felons, condemned and extradited to China's trial has brought a broad space for legal cooperation China and international. But the internationally recognized system of extradition in principle of non extradition of death penalty is an important factor in obstructing the international extradition smoothly due to death penalty. The abolition of the death penalty in between and keep thinking, values, concept of human rights is different and more depth in the fields of international law, to become one of the great principles of extradition. More charges in the criminal law of China sentenced to death, although our country criminal law "revised > reduces the death penalty charges the applicable provisions of the Supreme People's court, and withdraw the death penalty review power, its aim is to reduce the rate of death penalty for punishment, the death penalty is more strict, more careful. But in the judicial practice of our country, the annual death penalty rate is still in the world living high. And we must see that the extradition is a for the international criminal judicial assistance system, it can clearly reflect the spirit of the legislation of our country, reflects China's basic attitude in the protection of human rights issues and the international image of China" for the principle of Extradition Law adopted avoidance The attitude of the legislation is blank in our country. But in order to successfully carry out the international criminal judicial assistance, Extradition Law clearly stipulates that "the principle of non extradition of death penalty" should represent the general trend in our country. "The issue of extradition because the judicial system is different, and often involved in the country's political, economic, diplomatic and other aspects, so in some cases the issue of extradition difficulties, which has aroused widespread concern in the international community. In the issue of extradition on strengthening cooperation, seek common ground, has become the consensus of the international community. Therefore, how to use the principle of non extradition of death penalty in practice, more efficient to make domestic law actively cope with the international reality universally acknowledged the extradition of the legal issues is a subject worthy of our study. This article from the concept of the principle of the death penalty and the background of the analysis of the legal basis of the principle of the death penalty, with me In the practice of extradition legislation and judicial field, to explore the principle of non extradition of death penalty in our country is facing difficulties and countermeasures. At the same time, from the perspective of comparative law, reviewed the theory and practice of the principle of non extradition of death penalty, analyzes the extradition system of our country exists in the question of principle were discussed suggestions, hope is conducive to the improvement of the Extradition Law in China and the international criminal judicial cooperation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D924

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃風(fēng);;國際引渡合作規(guī)則的新發(fā)展[J];比較法研究;2006年03期

2 蔣麗麗;;中國適用死刑不引渡原則的立法探析[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年06期

3 舒洪水;付玉明;;略論我國引渡制度的現(xiàn)實困局與應(yīng)對出路[J];當代法學(xué);2008年05期

4 唐晨;;淺談中國簽訂國際引渡條約的障礙因素——由引渡外逃貪官想起的[J];法制與社會;2008年15期

5 陳煒楠;;關(guān)于死刑不引渡原則在我國實踐的國際法思考[J];法制與社會;2008年22期

6 吳畏;張煒;;淺議引渡司法審查中的證明標準[J];法制與社會;2011年30期

7 王峰;;淺析死刑不引渡原則[J];法制與社會;2013年08期

8 張茹茹;;淺談我國引渡制度的法律依據(jù)缺失問題與應(yīng)對之策[J];黑龍江科技信息;2011年05期

9 蔣中慧;;我國引渡制度發(fā)展中的一些問題及相關(guān)對策[J];經(jīng)濟視角(中旬);2011年08期

10 段瓊;;我國對“死刑不引渡原則”的運用與引渡立法的完善[J];南都學(xué)壇;2006年04期

，

本文編號：1718865