本文選題：國際貨物買賣合同　切入點：信用證原則　出處：《蘭州大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：信用證是當前國際經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易中被廣泛應用的支付方式,信用證支付使銀行信用代替了商業(yè)信用,不僅增進了國際貿(mào)易中買賣雙方的互信,而且也為買賣雙方提供了融資便利,極大地促進了國際經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易的發(fā)展。但與此同時,信用證關(guān)系復雜會涉及到不同地域的各方當事人利益,買賣雙方之間容易出現(xiàn)權(quán)利、義務之爭。近年來,國際上的信用證糾紛案件逐年增加,其中與我國有關(guān)的案件也是越來越多,再加上信用證糾紛案件的審理具有技術(shù)性、專業(yè)性,而我國關(guān)于信用證制度方面的法律、法規(guī)還很不健全,所以當我國法官在審理有關(guān)信用證糾紛的案件時往往評判不一,標準各異。 本文以安徽國興集團訴普和公司信用證糾紛案為切入點,在全面分析梳理案件問題的基礎上,針對目前我國法院在審理信用證糾紛案件時常常遇到的問題提出自己的意見與建議,希望對我國的信用證糾紛案件的審判工作有所幫助。本文主體共分三部分： 第一部分：對案件以及審理情況進行介紹,總結(jié)出案件的主要爭議點。 第二部分：對總結(jié)出的案件主要爭議問題進行法律分析,主要包括： 1、關(guān)于本案中的信用證欺詐問題的法律分析 2、關(guān)于本案中的信用證欺詐例外問題的法律分析 第三部分：在總結(jié)案件審理過程、分析案件結(jié)論的基礎上對目前我國在審理信用證糾紛案件時經(jīng)常遇到的問題提出自己的思考和建議,希望對我國的信用證制度建設有所幫助。
[Abstract]:Letter of credit is a widely used payment method in current international economy and trade. It makes bank credit replace commercial credit. It not only enhances mutual trust between buyers and sellers in international trade, but also provides financing facilities for both parties.It has greatly promoted the development of international economy and trade.But at the same time, the complicated relationship of letters of credit will involve the interests of all parties in different regions, and the dispute of rights and obligations between buyers and sellers is easy.In recent years, the international dispute cases of letters of credit have been increasing year by year, among which there are more and more cases related to our country. In addition, the trial of the disputes of letters of credit is of a technical and professional nature, while the law of our country on the system of letters of credit,The laws and regulations are still not perfect, so judges in our country often judge different cases about letters of credit.This paper takes the case of Anhui Guoxing Group v. Puhe letter of Credit as the starting point, and on the basis of comprehensive analysis of the case,In view of the problems often encountered by Chinese courts in handling the dispute cases of letters of credit at present, the author puts forward his own opinions and suggestions, and hopes to be helpful to the trial work of the dispute cases of letters of credit in our country.The main body of this paper is divided into three parts:The first part: the case and the trial situation are introduced, summarizes the main dispute points of the case.The second part: the legal analysis of the main disputes in the cases, including:1. The legal analysis on the fraud of letter of credit in this case2. The legal analysis of the exception of fraud in the letter of credit in this caseThe third part: on the basis of summing up the trial process and analyzing the conclusion of the case, the author puts forward his own thoughts and suggestions on the problems often encountered in handling the dispute cases of letters of credit in our country, hoping to be helpful to the construction of the letter of credit system in our country.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.2;D922.28;F740.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張淑玲;;信用證欺詐界定及相關(guān)法律問題[J];法學雜志;2006年02期

2 賈慶紅;信用證欺詐及其防范與處理[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2003年05期

3 龍著華;;信用證欺詐的民事救濟——兼評最高人民法院《關(guān)于審理信用證糾紛案件若干問題的規(guī)定》[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2006年05期

4 張碧安;信用證欺詐的立法完善[J];華東交通大學學報;2004年03期

5 狄俊鋒;劉鳳蘭;;淺談信用證欺詐及其防范[J];金融經(jīng)濟;2008年16期

6 張寒陽;;也談信用證欺詐與風險防范[J];吉首大學學報(社會科學版);2006年04期

7 毛毅堅;龔保華;;對信用證欺詐若干法律問題的思考[J];江西社會科學;2007年05期

8 吳憶萍;;論信用證欺詐罪的界定[J];綿陽師范學院學報;2008年06期

9 牟凡;;淺議信用證欺詐及其救濟方式[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2008年22期

10 陳輝庭;;信用證欺詐及其例外原則[J];中共福建省委黨校學報;2009年10期

，

本文編號：1714190