本文選題：鄰接權　切入點：網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下的鄰接權　出處：《鄭州大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：人們的生活因為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的發(fā)展而有所改變了,能夠帶給我們豐富的知識和信息,但在汲取信息時也可能會侵犯他人的權利。網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境的虛擬性、隱秘性等特點對現(xiàn)有的鄰接權保護法律制度是一項重大的挑戰(zhàn),從而引發(fā)了網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下鄰接權保護的問題,這就要求應隨著時代的發(fā)展來不斷完善相應的制度。最早規(guī)定鄰接權制度的國際公約是《羅馬公約》；而在《世界知識產(chǎn)權組織表演和錄音條約》中首次確立了網(wǎng)絡鄰接權享有的法律地位；而美國頒布的《跨世紀數(shù)字化版權法》則開始涉及對網(wǎng)絡鄰接權的內(nèi)容進行系統(tǒng)、完整的保護和對網(wǎng)絡技術的保護制度,并對侵權網(wǎng)絡鄰接權的行為加以責任限制。此外,該法還在原條文的基礎上調(diào)整了部分有關合理使用的內(nèi)容。由歐盟執(zhí)委會針對信息社會問題提出并通過的《調(diào)和信息社會中特定著作權及著作鄰接權指令》草案中則明確了發(fā)行權、復制權以及公開傳播權,并通過制定法律條文對復制裝置和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)管理信息等加以保護。綜合國際條約和相關國家關于網(wǎng)絡鄰接權法律制度的規(guī)定,針對當前我國網(wǎng)絡鄰接權法律制度設計過程中出現(xiàn)的問題,提出相應的解決措施,以期完善現(xiàn)有的網(wǎng)絡鄰接權制度。 本文一共分為四大部分進行論述。第一部分主要運用了文獻分析的研究方法,首先對鄰接權的進本內(nèi)容進行分析,進而探討引出網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下鄰接權的內(nèi)涵及特征。傳統(tǒng)的鄰接權制度相對是比較完善的,可是網(wǎng)絡的迅速發(fā)展,使得比較完備的鄰接權制度面臨了新的挑戰(zhàn),而如何能夠更好的適應網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境鄰接權制度面臨的新課題,需要明確權利的主體、客體及內(nèi)容,首先解決理論部分出現(xiàn)的問題。 第二部分以域外對網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下鄰接權的規(guī)定為研究重點,通過對國際公約、美國及歐盟等主要國家有關鄰接權的內(nèi)涵進行分析。根據(jù)當前立法和實踐狀況,為完善我國網(wǎng)絡鄰接權法律制度提供有益建議。 第三部分闡述了我國在網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下鄰接權法律制度建立過程中的立法實踐。對于目前我國網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下鄰接權制度的梳理,能夠更好的弄清楚問題所在。通過對現(xiàn)有制度的梳理,得出恰當結論,從而避免盲目借鑒國外制度。 第四部分以我國網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下鄰接權制度的相關法律保護為重點,本研究通過對網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下鄰接權的分析,以及國內(nèi)外立法現(xiàn)狀的分析,引出我國鄰接權制度有待完善的方面,提出相應的制度及策略,從而形成相對完備的鄰接權制度,適應社會發(fā)展的需要,為使我國網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下的鄰接權保護得到法律上的保障。
[Abstract]:People's lives have changed as a result of the development of the Internet, which can bring us rich knowledge and information, but it may also violate the rights of others in drawing information.The virtuality and secrecy of network environment are a great challenge to the existing legal system of neighborhood right protection, which leads to the problem of neighborhood right protection in network environment.This requires that with the development of the times to constantly improve the corresponding system.The earliest international convention regulating the system of neighboring rights is the Rome Convention, and the legal status of the right of network neighborhood is established for the first time in the performance and recording Treaty of the World intellectual property Organization (WIPO).The American Digital copyright Law, promulgated by the United States, begins to involve the systematic, complete protection and protection system of network technology, and limits the liability for infringement of network adjacent rights.In addition, the law also adjusts part of the content of reasonable use on the basis of the original provisions.The draft Directive on Harmonization of specific copyright and neighbouring Rights of works in the Information Society, proposed and adopted by the European Union Executive Committee in response to information society issues, specifies the right to distribution, the right to reproduction and the right to public dissemination.And through the formulation of legal provisions to copy devices and Internet management information to protect.In view of the problems in the design of the legal system of the network neighborhood right in our country, this paper puts forward the corresponding solutions in order to perfect the existing system of the network neighborhood right by synthesizing the international treaties and the regulations of the relevant countries on the legal system of the network neighboring right.This article is divided into four parts to discuss.The first part mainly uses the research method of literature analysis. Firstly, it analyzes the content of neighborhood right, and then discusses the connotation and characteristics of neighborhood right in network environment.The traditional neighborhood right system is relatively perfect, but with the rapid development of the network, the relatively complete neighboring right system is faced with new challenges, and how to better adapt to the new problem facing the network environment neighborhood right system.Need to clarify the subject, object and content of the right, first of all to solve the theoretical problems.The second part focuses on the extraterritorial provisions of neighboring rights in the network environment, through the analysis of the international conventions, the United States and the European Union and other major countries about the connotation of neighboring rights.According to the current situation of legislation and practice, some useful suggestions are provided for perfecting the legal system of network neighboring right in our country.The third part expounds the legislative practice in the process of establishing the legal system of neighboring right in the network environment.For the current network environment in our country neighborhood right system combing, can better understand where the problem lies.By combing the existing system, the appropriate conclusion can be drawn so as to avoid blindly drawing lessons from foreign institutions.The fourth part focuses on the related legal protection of the neighboring right system in the network environment of our country. Through the analysis of the neighboring right in the network environment and the analysis of the domestic and foreign legislative status, the author draws the conclusion that the neighboring right system of our country needs to be perfected.The corresponding system and strategy are put forward to form a relatively complete neighboring right system, to meet the needs of social development, and to ensure the legal protection of the neighboring right in our country's network environment.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.1;D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張漁;西方版權交易中的鄰接權[J];出版參考;2004年13期

2 楊曉鳴;試論信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2002年08期

3 趙杰;謝波;;試論我國出版者權的法律保護[J];出版科學;2007年06期

4 劉蔚文;論著作權中的出租權[J];當代法學;2003年10期

5 馬曉剛,肖群;網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下錄音制作者權同樣受法律保護──一起網(wǎng)絡訴訟案的代理回顧[J];中國司法;2001年01期

6 杜蕙林;;談談著作鄰接權國際公約[J];國際商務(對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學學報);1995年01期

7 高文藝;錄音錄像制作者權利及其保護[J];國際貿(mào)易;1997年05期

8 林燁;表演者權片論——關于表演、表演者、表演作品相關的幾個特殊問題[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2004年05期

9 曹明睿;加入WTO與中國的版權保護[J];石家莊經(jīng)濟學院學報;2005年01期

10 羅靜;;論Trips協(xié)議下我國報刊社之版權及有關權[J];湖南大學學報(社會科學版);2007年03期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 吳鵬;[N];人民法院報;2006年

，

本文編號：1704625