本文選題：用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)　切入點(diǎn)：華盛頓公約　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則是一項(xiàng)古老的國(guó)際習(xí)慣法規(guī)則。它的發(fā)展過(guò)程不是一帆風(fēng)順的,而是一波三折的。如揭示客觀事物發(fā)展的規(guī)律性,往往表現(xiàn)在其萌發(fā)、產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展、興盛、衰微、替代、悄然重現(xiàn)的過(guò)程。在國(guó)際投資發(fā)展之初,國(guó)際實(shí)踐普遍遵循用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則,廣大國(guó)際法學(xué)家也予以贊同。但隨著國(guó)際投資的蓬勃發(fā)展,以兩次歷史事件為分割線,用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則受到了極大的挑戰(zhàn)。隨著1965年國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端解決中心的建立以及《華盛頓公約》的通過(guò),用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則作為可選擇項(xiàng)被大為削弱。雖然根據(jù)公約用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)與國(guó)際仲裁可以并存且作為國(guó)際仲裁的前置條件,但是之后各國(guó)實(shí)踐表明,東道國(guó)和投資者很少選擇用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)作為爭(zhēng)議解決方式。十九世紀(jì)八十年代雙邊投資條約的興起,國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端解決中心的管轄權(quán)不再源自東道國(guó)與投資者的合同約定,而是源自于東道國(guó)和投資者簽訂的雙邊投資條約。國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端解決中心管轄權(quán)的國(guó)際地位因雙邊投資條約的廣泛實(shí)踐而固定。用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則被進(jìn)一步裁汰。我國(guó)改革開(kāi)放實(shí)踐三十年來(lái),成功的由資本缺乏的貿(mào)易弱國(guó)轉(zhuǎn)型為資本過(guò)剩的貿(mào)易大國(guó),從請(qǐng)進(jìn)來(lái)到與國(guó)際接軌到走出去的無(wú)縫對(duì)接使得我國(guó)從資本輸入大國(guó)變?yōu)橘Y本輸出大國(guó)。走出去不只是國(guó)家的導(dǎo)向政策,從根本上說(shuō)是以經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展規(guī)律為基礎(chǔ)的必然選擇。身兼資本輸入和資本輸出兩種身份,在引進(jìn)來(lái)和走出去雙向縱深開(kāi)放的新格局中,如何對(duì)待用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則成為關(guān)鍵的新課題。在資本輸入環(huán)節(jié)中,來(lái)華的投資主體主要是發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家。雖然我國(guó)正處于從貿(mào)易大國(guó)向貿(mào)易強(qiáng)國(guó)的轉(zhuǎn)換過(guò)程中,但本質(zhì)上還是一個(gè)發(fā)展中國(guó)家。因此對(duì)于引進(jìn)來(lái)我國(guó)仍須采取務(wù)實(shí)的態(tài)度堅(jiān)持用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)。在資本輸出的環(huán)節(jié)中,我國(guó)的對(duì)外投資流向地有發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家也有發(fā)展中國(guó)家。隨著一帶一路的行穩(wěn)致遠(yuǎn)地推進(jìn),將會(huì)有越來(lái)越多的發(fā)展中國(guó)家成為中國(guó)的合作對(duì)象。因此在對(duì)外投資的過(guò)程中,中國(guó)對(duì)用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則應(yīng)當(dāng)有所取舍,一味堅(jiān)持用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則既不符合我國(guó)對(duì)外投資者的利益,也不利于走出的戰(zhàn)略。
[Abstract]:The principle of exhaustion of local remedies is an ancient rule of customary international law. Its development process is not smooth, but a series of twists and turns. If it reveals the regularity of the development of objective things, it is often manifested in its germination, production, development and prosperity. At the beginning of the development of international investment, international practice generally followed the principle of exhaustion of local remedies, and so did the vast number of international jurists. But with the vigorous development of international investment, The principle of exhaustion of local remedies was greatly challenged by the separation of two historical events. With the establishment of the International Centre for settlement of Investment disputes in 1965 and the adoption of the Washington Convention, The principle of exhaustion of local remedies as an optional item is considerably weakened... while exhaustion of local remedies and international arbitration may coexist and are pre-conditions for international arbitration under the Convention, subsequent State practice has shown that. Host countries and investors rarely choose to exhaust local remedies as a means of dispute settlement. With the emergence of bilateral investment treaties in the 1880s, the jurisdiction of the International Centre for settlement of Investment disputes (ICSID) no longer derives from contractual agreements between host countries and investors, The international status of the International Centre for settlement of Investment disputes (ICSID) is fixed by the extensive practice of bits. The principle of exhaustion of local remedies is further reduced. Over the past 30 years of reform and opening up, A successful transition from a weak, capital-starved trading country to a large trading country with excess capital, The seamless docking from invitation to international integration to the outside world has transformed our country from a large capital importing country to a large capital exporting country. Going out is not just a country's guiding policy. Fundamentally speaking, it is an inevitable choice based on the laws of economic development. How to deal with the principle of exhaustion of local remedies has become a key new issue. In the process of capital input, the main investors coming to China are mainly developed countries. Although China is in the process of transforming from a big trading country to a powerful trading country, But it is still a developing country in essence. Therefore, we still have to adopt a pragmatic attitude towards bringing in our country and insist on exhausting local remedies. China's foreign investment flows to both developed and developing countries. With Belt and Road's steady progress, more and more developing countries will become the object of China's cooperation. Therefore, in the process of outward investment, China should choose and choose from the principle of exhaustion of local remedies and blindly adhere to the principle of exhaustion of local remedies is neither in the interests of our foreign investors nor conducive to the strategy of going out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D996.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐樹(shù);;國(guó)際投資條約“雙軌”執(zhí)行機(jī)制的沖突及協(xié)調(diào)[J];法商研究;2017年02期

2 陳正健;;投資者與國(guó)家爭(zhēng)端解決中的國(guó)家反訴[J];法商研究;2017年01期

3 王露陽(yáng);;ISDS中投資者與東道國(guó)權(quán)益平衡性探究——美國(guó)路徑轉(zhuǎn)變及對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];河北法學(xué);2016年12期

4 雋薪;;將人權(quán)納入投資規(guī)則:國(guó)際投資體制改革中的機(jī)遇與挑戰(zhàn)[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2016年05期

5 馬冉;;國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端中涉文化爭(zhēng)端的法律問(wèn)題研究——以公平公正待遇與征收條款的適用為視角[J];上海對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年05期

6 黃世席;;歐盟國(guó)際投資仲裁法庭制度的緣起與因應(yīng)[J];法商研究;2016年04期

7 曾華群;;論雙邊投資條約范本的演進(jìn)與中國(guó)的對(duì)策[J];國(guó)際法研究;2016年04期

8 張慶麟;;歐盟投資者-國(guó)家爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制改革實(shí)踐評(píng)析[J];法商研究;2016年03期

9 安曉明;;我國(guó)“一帶一路”研究脈絡(luò)與進(jìn)展[J];區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2016年02期

10 殷敏;;用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則在區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定中的適用[J];上海對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 殷敏;外交保護(hù)法律制度及其發(fā)展勢(shì)態(tài)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王帥;用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

2 鄭佳;論用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

3 唐伯軍;論歐洲人權(quán)司法機(jī)制下的用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)規(guī)則[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：1662380