后危機(jī)背景下對(duì)美國(guó)301條款的重新審視
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-20 07:02
本文選題:后危機(jī) 切入點(diǎn):條款 出處:《西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2012年03期 論文類(lèi)型:期刊論文
【摘要】:二戰(zhàn)后形成了全球經(jīng)濟(jì)依賴(lài)美國(guó)的局面,這種依賴(lài)性使美國(guó)具備了影響他國(guó)政治和立法的能力。為了保障其獲得最大利潤(rùn),美國(guó)通過(guò)制定301條款推行經(jīng)濟(jì)霸權(quán)。然而,301條款本身是違反國(guó)際法基本原則的。源于美國(guó)的次貸危機(jī)演變?yōu)槿蛐缘慕鹑谖C(jī),初步動(dòng)搖了原有的經(jīng)濟(jì)依賴(lài)關(guān)系,全球經(jīng)濟(jì)對(duì)美國(guó)依賴(lài)的不對(duì)稱(chēng)性減弱。在后危機(jī)背景下,其他國(guó)家應(yīng)該采取聯(lián)合行動(dòng),要求美國(guó)廢除301條款。
[Abstract]:After World War II, the global economy became dependent on the United States, which gave the United States the ability to influence other countries' politics and legislation. The United States promotes economic hegemony through the formulation of Section 301. However, Section 301 itself violates the basic principles of international law. The subprime mortgage crisis, which originated in the United States, has evolved into a global financial crisis, which has initially shaken the original economic dependence. The global economy's dependence on the United States has weakened. In the post-crisis context, other countries should take joint action to demand that the United States repeal Section 301.
【作者單位】: 重慶大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】:國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金資助項(xiàng)目(08XFX023)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D996.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 黃海洲;;全球經(jīng)濟(jì)格局轉(zhuǎn)變與中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2008年05期
2 歐陽(yáng)\,
本文編號(hào):1637997
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/1637997.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著