本文選題：歐盟反傾銷　切入點：價值取向　出處：《浙江工商大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在當(dāng)前的國際環(huán)境下,國際貿(mào)易自由化不斷深化,各國的經(jīng)濟互補性、相互依存度和利益契合點不斷加強。尤其是受到西方文化洗禮的歐盟地區(qū),其對外開放速度更加迅速。與此同時,歐盟的反傾銷法律和實踐卻時常發(fā)出不和諧的聲音。文章重點運用法經(jīng)濟學(xué)研究方法,從法律供求、成本收益、均衡等方面對歐盟反傾銷法的價值取向進行深入分析。 首先,文章介紹了法經(jīng)濟學(xué)的研究方法,其運用微觀經(jīng)濟學(xué)理論和方法來對法律進行分析,把效益作為法律的基本價值目標(biāo)和評價標(biāo)準(zhǔn),試圖在法學(xué)“公平”、“正義”的價值取向基礎(chǔ)上,滲入“效益”、“成本”、“均衡”、“博弈”等經(jīng)濟學(xué)價值取向。最終指出在歐盟反傾銷實施過程中,應(yīng)發(fā)揮法經(jīng)濟學(xué)的方法論特點,為歐盟反傾銷法的立法和實踐提出合理且符合實際的指導(dǎo)建議。 其次,對傾銷、反傾銷和反傾銷法,以及反傾銷法價值取向等概念進行法經(jīng)濟學(xué)解釋,指出反傾銷法的價值取向是歐盟確定對外實施反傾銷的重要理論依據(jù)。在反傾銷問題上,各國既重視消除來自國外具有競爭優(yōu)勢產(chǎn)業(yè)的競爭行為,為國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)的健康發(fā)展創(chuàng)造環(huán)境,又有義務(wù)為本國／地區(qū)的消費者提供優(yōu)厚的社會福利,故包括歐盟在內(nèi)的反傾銷實施者必須在保障本國／地區(qū)工業(yè)發(fā)展,保護消費者(包括進口商、下游用戶等)利益之間做出權(quán)衡,使各個利益主體在一定時期內(nèi)能夠維持利益均衡。 再次,通過歐盟反傾銷法的供給需求分析,指出因傾銷行為增加交易成本,無法達到資源最優(yōu)配置的效果,故產(chǎn)生對反傾銷法律的需求。但因?qū)嵺`中傾銷行為卻缺少存在的社會基礎(chǔ),由此說明歐盟反傾銷法存在現(xiàn)實的供求偏差,得出歐盟反傾銷法“限制競爭”的本質(zhì)；另外,通過歐盟反傾銷法的成本收益分析,指出歐盟反傾銷法在實施過程中,難以證明其收益大于成本的結(jié)論,僅是歐盟為實現(xiàn)反傾銷涉及的各方主體間的利益均衡狀態(tài)。 然后,指出雖然歐盟反傾銷法無法實現(xiàn)立法的初衷,但其存在一定的合理性。故對歐盟反傾銷法實施的合理性進行重新定位,得出歐盟反傾銷法在滿足局部供求平衡、緩解競爭壓力、避免貿(mào)易沖突、促進貿(mào)易自由化等方面存在現(xiàn)實合理性。 最后,對歐盟反傾銷法的價值取向進行綜述,得出公平和效率均不是歐盟反傾銷的價值取向,均衡才是歐盟反傾銷法的真正價值取向所在。本文通過對歐盟反傾銷法價值取向的深入分析,可為今后各國反傾銷立法的確立和完善,以及客觀分析國際反傾銷法在實踐中的實際功效有借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:In the current international environment, the liberalization of international trade is deepening, the economies of various countries are complementary, the interdependence and the common points of interest are constantly strengthened. Especially in the EU region, which is baptized by Western culture, At the same time, the European Union's anti-dumping laws and practices often make a discordant sound. This article focuses on the use of legal and economic research methods, from the legal supply and demand, cost-benefit, The value orientation of EU anti-dumping law is deeply analyzed from the aspects of equilibrium and so on. First of all, the article introduces the research methods of law and economics. It uses microeconomics theory and method to analyze the law, and regards the benefit as the basic value goal and evaluation standard of law. On the basis of the value orientation of law "fairness" and "justice", this paper attempts to infiltrate the value orientation of economics such as "benefit", "cost", "equilibrium" and "game". Finally, it points out that the methodological features of law and economics should be brought into play in the process of EU anti-dumping implementation. This paper puts forward reasonable and practical guidance for the legislation and practice of EU anti-dumping law. Secondly, the concepts of dumping, anti-dumping and antidumping law, as well as the value orientation of antidumping law are explained by law and economics. It is pointed out that the value orientation of antidumping law is the important theoretical basis for the EU to determine the implementation of antidumping. In the case of anti-dumping, all countries attach importance to eliminating the competitive behavior of foreign industries with competitive advantages. Create an environment for the healthy development of domestic industries and have an obligation to provide favourable social welfare for consumers in the country / region. Therefore, anti-dumping practitioners, including the European Union, must safeguard the industrial development of their own countries / regions. Protect the interests of consumers (including importers, downstream users, etc.) to make a balance between the interests of various stakeholders in a certain period of time. Thirdly, through the analysis of supply and demand of EU anti-dumping law, it is pointed out that the optimal allocation of resources can not be achieved because of the increase of transaction cost due to dumping. Therefore, there is a demand for antidumping law. However, there is no social foundation for dumping in practice, which shows that there is a realistic deviation between supply and demand in EU anti-dumping law, and the essence of EU antidumping law is "restricting competition". Based on the cost-benefit analysis of EU anti-dumping law, it is pointed out that it is difficult to prove that the benefit of EU anti-dumping law is greater than that of cost in the course of its implementation, and it is only a state of interest equilibrium between the parties involved in EU anti-dumping. Then, it points out that although the EU anti-dumping law cannot realize the original intention of legislation, it has certain rationality. Therefore, the rationality of EU anti-dumping law is reoriented, and the EU anti-dumping law meets the balance of local supply and demand. It is reasonable to relieve competition pressure, avoid trade conflict and promote trade liberalization. Finally, the value orientation of EU anti-dumping law is summarized, and it is concluded that fairness and efficiency are not the value orientation of EU anti-dumping. The balance is the true value orientation of EU anti-dumping law. Through the in-depth analysis of the value orientation of EU antidumping law, this paper can establish and perfect the antidumping legislation of various countries in the future. And objective analysis of international anti-dumping law in practice of the actual effect of reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁磊,顏延,蔣群英;論反傾銷法的歷史局限性[J];財經(jīng)研究;2003年03期

2 羅亞萍;鄧霓;;論反傾銷法的政治經(jīng)濟功能[J];國際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期

3 覃紅;潘毅華;;反傾銷制度的法律經(jīng)濟分析[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2006年03期

4 李楊;;多邊貿(mào)易體制的博弈機制[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2008年05期

5 崔新有;;反傾銷異化:一個國際貿(mào)易問題的倫理分析[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2010年03期

6 谷祖莎;反傾銷中的價格承諾問題研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟;2005年04期

7 楊伏英;王麗萍;;從法律價值取向分析反傾銷制度中公共利益原則[J];南京財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年01期

8 楊悅;劉學(xué)東;常明;;歐盟反傾銷政策特征及涉案企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略行為分析[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟與管理研究;2010年01期

9 陳凌;歐盟反傾銷法探析[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2004年01期

10 孫曉光,楊秀翰;對反傾銷法存在合理性的再思考[J];山東行政學(xué)院山東省經(jīng)濟管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉超;歐盟反傾銷的“適當(dāng)論”觀照[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

2 都亳;WTO貿(mào)易救濟制度的法經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1627715