本文選題：國(guó)際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓　切入點(diǎn)：回授條款　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：回授條款是技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中當(dāng)事人通過(guò)合同的形式對(duì)技術(shù)改進(jìn)所作出的一種協(xié)議安排。在轉(zhuǎn)讓技術(shù)時(shí),無(wú)論是哪一方對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)讓的技術(shù)作出了改進(jìn),都會(huì)使對(duì)方面臨一定的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓方往往會(huì)考慮通過(guò)回授的方式來(lái)化解這種風(fēng)險(xiǎn),與此同時(shí),轉(zhuǎn)讓方還會(huì)將回授條款作為維持技術(shù)優(yōu)勢(shì)、進(jìn)行技術(shù)壟斷、排擠競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手的進(jìn)攻型工具。因此,回授條款具有激發(fā)權(quán)利人轉(zhuǎn)讓技術(shù)的積極性、促進(jìn)資源優(yōu)化配置等積極作用的同時(shí),也會(huì)產(chǎn)生抑制技術(shù)受讓方的創(chuàng)新動(dòng)力、強(qiáng)化自身市場(chǎng)地位等消極作用。 我國(guó)企業(yè)由于自身實(shí)力的差距、自我保護(hù)意識(shí)淡薄,加上企業(yè)常出于局部利益等考慮,往往為了得到技術(shù)而輕易地接受不平等的回授條款,從而使自己的利益受損,有時(shí)還會(huì)使技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的目的落空,甚至可能對(duì)我國(guó)相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展造成較大的負(fù)面影響。 雖然我國(guó)現(xiàn)行關(guān)于回授條款的立法在一定程度上能夠促進(jìn)技術(shù)貿(mào)易的發(fā)展,維護(hù)我國(guó)企業(yè)在技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中的利益,但依然存在著立法不成體系、法律后果不明確、條文設(shè)計(jì)簡(jiǎn)單化缺乏科學(xué)界定和可操作性等問(wèn)題,這必然使得其在規(guī)制國(guó)際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中的回授條款時(shí)作用有限。針對(duì)目前我國(guó)在規(guī)制回授條款上存在的問(wèn)題,通過(guò)對(duì)美國(guó)、歐盟和日本等國(guó)家和地區(qū)對(duì)回授條款法律規(guī)制的比較分析,本文就我國(guó)如何規(guī)制回授條款提出了一些改進(jìn)建議,希望為維護(hù)國(guó)際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中我國(guó)當(dāng)事人權(quán)益并為構(gòu)建公平、合理的技術(shù)交易秩序作出一點(diǎn)貢獻(xiàn)。 回授條款是一個(gè)較為復(fù)雜的問(wèn)題,由于其既有促進(jìn)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、鼓勵(lì)創(chuàng)新的一面,又有阻礙競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、形成壟斷的一面,因此對(duì)待回授條款不能一概而論,應(yīng)根據(jù)實(shí)際情況,具體分析、區(qū)別對(duì)待。在國(guó)際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中,對(duì)回授條款的分析評(píng)價(jià)應(yīng)立足于我國(guó)國(guó)情,全面考慮其對(duì)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和資源配置等各種因素的影響程度,采取靈活策略,有效應(yīng)對(duì)并利用好該條款,做到于己有利、為我所用。
[Abstract]:A return clause is an agreed arrangement made by the parties to the transfer of technology in the form of a contract for the improvement of the technology. At the time of the transfer of the technology, no matter which party has improved the transferred technology, The technology transferor will often consider resolving this risk by means of a return grant. At the same time, the transferor will also use the terms of the return grant to maintain the technological advantage and to monopolize the technology. Therefore, while stimulating the enthusiasm of the obligee to transfer technology and promoting the optimal allocation of resources, it will also produce innovative power to restrain the technology transferee. Strengthen oneself market position wait for negative effect. Because of the disparity of their own strength, the weak consciousness of self-protection and the consideration of local interests, Chinese enterprises often accept unequal terms of return in order to obtain technology, thus making their own interests suffer. Sometimes the purpose of technology transfer will be disappointed, and even the development of related industries in China may be adversely affected. Although the current legislation on the return clause in our country can to some extent promote the development of technology trade and safeguard the interests of Chinese enterprises in technology transfer, there is still legislation that is not systematic and the legal consequences are not clear. The article design simplification lacks scientific definition and maneuverability, which inevitably makes it play a limited role in regulating the return clause in international technology transfer. The European Union and Japan and other countries and regions have made a comparative analysis of the legal regulation of the return clause. This paper puts forward some suggestions on how to regulate the return clause in order to safeguard the rights and interests of the Chinese parties in the international technology transfer and to build fairness. A reasonable order of technical transactions makes a little contribution. The return clause is a more complicated problem. Because it not only promotes competition, encourages innovation, but also hinders competition and forms monopoly, it cannot be generalized and should be analyzed according to the actual situation. In international technology transfer, the analysis and evaluation of the return clause should be based on the national conditions of our country, take into account the degree of influence on market competition, technological innovation and resource allocation, and adopt flexible strategies. Effectively deal with and make good use of this clause, to their own advantage, for my own use.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.5

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊建明;國(guó)際技術(shù)貿(mào)易中限制性條款研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2013年

2 劉锫;基于專(zhuān)利許可限制的專(zhuān)利添附研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1600845